From 4f6563677ae833baad8003e14353241bc25da4fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Coddington Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:38:14 -0400 Subject: Move locks API users to locks_lock_inode_wait() Instead of having users check for FL_POSIX or FL_FLOCK to call the correct locks API function, use the check within locks_lock_inode_wait(). This allows for some later cleanup. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 13 +------------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c') diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 693b903b48bd..ce64a45ab648 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -5472,18 +5472,7 @@ static int nfs4_proc_getlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock * static int do_vfs_lock(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *fl) { - int res = 0; - switch (fl->fl_flags & (FL_POSIX|FL_FLOCK)) { - case FL_POSIX: - res = posix_lock_inode_wait(inode, fl); - break; - case FL_FLOCK: - res = flock_lock_inode_wait(inode, fl); - break; - default: - BUG(); - } - return res; + return locks_lock_inode_wait(inode, fl); } struct nfs4_unlockdata { -- cgit