From 2055da97389a605c8a00d163d40903afbe413921 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:06:46 +0200 Subject: sched/wait: Disambiguate wq_entry->task_list and wq_head->task_list naming So I've noticed a number of instances where it was not obvious from the code whether ->task_list was for a wait-queue head or a wait-queue entry. Furthermore, there's a number of wait-queue users where the lists are not for 'tasks' but other entities (poll tables, etc.), in which case the 'task_list' name is actively confusing. To clear this all up, name the wait-queue head and entry list structure fields unambiguously: struct wait_queue_head::task_list => ::head struct wait_queue_entry::task_list => ::entry For example, this code: rqw->wait.task_list.next != &wait->task_list ... is was pretty unclear (to me) what it's doing, while now it's written this way: rqw->wait.head.next != &wait->entry ... which makes it pretty clear that we are iterating a list until we see the head. Other examples are: list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->task_list, task_list) { list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.task_list, task_list) { ... where it's unclear (to me) what we are iterating, and during review it's hard to tell whether it's trying to walk a wait-queue entry (which would be a bug), while now it's written as: list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->head, entry) { list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.head, entry) { Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/nilfs2') diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c index 775304e7f96f..70ded52dc1dd 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c @@ -2206,8 +2206,7 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_wakeup(struct nilfs_sc_info *sci, int err) unsigned long flags; spin_lock_irqsave(&sci->sc_wait_request.lock, flags); - list_for_each_entry_safe(wrq, n, &sci->sc_wait_request.task_list, - wq.task_list) { + list_for_each_entry_safe(wrq, n, &sci->sc_wait_request.head, wq.entry) { if (!atomic_read(&wrq->done) && nilfs_cnt32_ge(sci->sc_seq_done, wrq->seq)) { wrq->err = err; -- cgit