From 72f6fe1fe5a386225cdc30f025681830a63a117e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Norton.Zhu" Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:44:28 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: optimize error handling in dlm_request_join Currently error handling in dlm_request_join is a little obscure, so optimize it to promote readability. If packet.code is invalid, reset it to JOIN_DISALLOW to keep it meaningful. It only influences the log printing. Signed-off-by: Norton.Zhu Cc: Srinivas Eeda Reviewed-by: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/ocfs2/dlm') diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c index 019459b20aeb..6918f30d02cd 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c @@ -1465,39 +1465,46 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, if (status == -ENOPROTOOPT) { status = 0; *response = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP; - } else if (packet.code == JOIN_DISALLOW || - packet.code == JOIN_OK_NO_MAP) { - *response = packet.code; - } else if (packet.code == JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH) { - mlog(ML_NOTICE, - "This node requested DLM locking protocol %u.%u and " - "filesystem locking protocol %u.%u. At least one of " - "the protocol versions on node %d is not compatible, " - "disconnecting\n", - dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major, - dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor, - dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_major, - dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor, - node); - status = -EPROTO; - *response = packet.code; - } else if (packet.code == JOIN_OK) { - *response = packet.code; - /* Use the same locking protocol as the remote node */ - dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.dlm_minor; - dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.fs_minor; - mlog(0, - "Node %d responds JOIN_OK with DLM locking protocol " - "%u.%u and fs locking protocol %u.%u\n", - node, - dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major, - dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor, - dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_major, - dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor); } else { - status = -EINVAL; - mlog(ML_ERROR, "invalid response %d from node %u\n", - packet.code, node); + *response = packet.code; + switch (packet.code) { + case JOIN_DISALLOW: + case JOIN_OK_NO_MAP: + break; + case JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH: + mlog(ML_NOTICE, + "This node requested DLM locking protocol %u.%u and " + "filesystem locking protocol %u.%u. At least one of " + "the protocol versions on node %d is not compatible, " + "disconnecting\n", + dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major, + dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor, + dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_major, + dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor, + node); + status = -EPROTO; + break; + case JOIN_OK: + /* Use the same locking protocol as the remote node */ + dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.dlm_minor; + dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.fs_minor; + mlog(0, + "Node %d responds JOIN_OK with DLM locking protocol " + "%u.%u and fs locking protocol %u.%u\n", + node, + dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_major, + dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor, + dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_major, + dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor); + break; + default: + status = -EINVAL; + mlog(ML_ERROR, "invalid response %d from node %u\n", + packet.code, node); + /* Reset response to JOIN_DISALLOW */ + *response = JOIN_DISALLOW; + break; + } } mlog(0, "status %d, node %d response is %d\n", status, node, -- cgit