From 1119d3c06f64a7123d774c363440987952c522ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: piaojun <piaojun@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 16:18:33 -0700
Subject: ocfs2: use 'osb' instead of 'OCFS2_SB()'

We could use 'osb' instead of 'OCFS2_SB()' to make code more elegant.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5A702111.7090907@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'fs/ocfs2/xattr.c')

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
index c261c1dfd374..3a24ce3deb01 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -3564,7 +3564,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
 		.not_found = -ENODATA,
 	};
 
-	if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb)))
+	if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(osb))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	/*
-- 
cgit