From 56ff5efad96182f4d3cb3dc6b07396762c658f16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:34:39 -0500 Subject: zero i_uid/i_gid on inode allocation ... and don't bother in callers. Don't bother with zeroing i_blocks, while we are at it - it's already been zeroed. i_mode is not worth the effort; it has no common default value. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/romfs/inode.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/romfs') diff --git a/fs/romfs/inode.c b/fs/romfs/inode.c index 60d2f822e87b..c97d4c931715 100644 --- a/fs/romfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/romfs/inode.c @@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ romfs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino) i->i_size = be32_to_cpu(ri.size); i->i_mtime.tv_sec = i->i_atime.tv_sec = i->i_ctime.tv_sec = 0; i->i_mtime.tv_nsec = i->i_atime.tv_nsec = i->i_ctime.tv_nsec = 0; - i->i_uid = i->i_gid = 0; /* Precalculate the data offset */ ino = romfs_strnlen(i, ino+ROMFH_SIZE, ROMFS_MAXFN); -- cgit