From b490bdd630cc43a5725e76c7c23f8a7e55551145 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Magnani Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:48:40 -0500 Subject: udf: Fix 64-bit sign extension issues affecting blocks > 0x7FFFFFFF Large (> 1 TiB) UDF filesystems appear subject to several problems when mounted on 64-bit systems: * readdir() can fail on a directory containing File Identifiers residing above 0x7FFFFFFF. This manifests as a 'ls' command failing with EIO. * FIBMAP on a file block located above 0x7FFFFFFF can return a negative value. The low 32 bits are correct, but applications that don't mask the high 32 bits of the result can perform incorrectly. Per suggestion by Jan Kara, introduce a udf_pblk_t type for representation of UDF block addresses. Ultimately, all driver functions that manipulate UDF block addresses should use this type; for now, deployment is limited to functions with actual or potential sign extension issues. Changes to udf_readdir() and udf_block_map() address the issues noted above; other changes address potential similar issues uncovered during audit of the driver code. Signed-off-by: Steven J. Magnani Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/udf/dir.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/udf/dir.c') diff --git a/fs/udf/dir.c b/fs/udf/dir.c index 2d0e028067eb..c19dba45aa20 100644 --- a/fs/udf/dir.c +++ b/fs/udf/dir.c @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static int udf_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) struct udf_fileident_bh fibh = { .sbh = NULL, .ebh = NULL}; struct fileIdentDesc *fi = NULL; struct fileIdentDesc cfi; - int block, iblock; + udf_pblk_t block, iblock; loff_t nf_pos; int flen; unsigned char *fname = NULL, *copy_name = NULL; -- cgit