From 6b8be6df7f971919622d152d144c8798ad7fd160 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Reiser Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:33:13 +0100 Subject: x86: add ENDPROC() markers The ENDPROCs() were not used everywhere. Some code used just END() instead, while other code used nothing. um/sys-i386/checksum.S didn't #include . I also got confused because gcc puts the .type near the ENTRY, while ENDPROC puts it on the opposite end. Signed off by: John Reiser Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- include/linux/linkage.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'include/linux/linkage.h') diff --git a/include/linux/linkage.h b/include/linux/linkage.h index ceeeb5ea5b15..3faf599ea58e 100644 --- a/include/linux/linkage.h +++ b/include/linux/linkage.h @@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ .size name, .-name #endif +/* If symbol 'name' is treated as a subroutine (gets called, and returns) + * then please use ENDPROC to mark 'name' as STT_FUNC for the benefit of + * static analysis tools such as stack depth analyzer. + */ #ifndef ENDPROC #define ENDPROC(name) \ .type name, @function; \ -- cgit