From 8b33485128ad932f807f4535e0b440733d8b5808 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yunsheng Lin Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 13:01:07 +0800 Subject: net: skbuff: update comment about pfmemalloc propagating __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc() is not doing any pfmemalloc propagating, and yet it has a comment about that, commit 84ce071e38a6 ("net: introduce __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc") may have accidentally moved it to __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(), so move it back to __skb_fill_page_desc() which is supposed to be doing pfmemalloc propagating. Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin CC: Pavel Begunkov Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515050107.46397-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni --- include/linux/skbuff.h | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/skbuff.h') diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h index 00e8c435fa1a..4b8d55247198 100644 --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h @@ -2426,11 +2426,6 @@ static inline void __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(struct skb_shared_info *shinfo, { skb_frag_t *frag = &shinfo->frags[i]; - /* - * Propagate page pfmemalloc to the skb if we can. The problem is - * that not all callers have unique ownership of the page but rely - * on page_is_pfmemalloc doing the right thing(tm). - */ skb_frag_fill_page_desc(frag, page, off, size); } @@ -2463,6 +2458,11 @@ static inline void __skb_fill_page_desc(struct sk_buff *skb, int i, struct page *page, int off, int size) { __skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(skb_shinfo(skb), i, page, off, size); + + /* Propagate page pfmemalloc to the skb if we can. The problem is + * that not all callers have unique ownership of the page but rely + * on page_is_pfmemalloc doing the right thing(tm). + */ page = compound_head(page); if (page_is_pfmemalloc(page)) skb->pfmemalloc = true; -- cgit