From 90caccdd8cc0215705f18b92771b449b01e2474a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 15:37:20 -0700 Subject: bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT - bpf prog_array just like all other types of bpf array accepts 32-bit index. Clarify that in the comment. - fix x64 JIT of bpf_tail_call which was incorrectly loading 8 instead of 4 bytes - tighten corresponding check in the interpreter to stay consistent The JIT bug can be triggered after introduction of BPF_F_NUMA_NODE flag in commit 96eabe7a40aa in 4.14. Before that the map_flags would stay zero and though JIT code is wrong it will check bounds correctly. Hence two fixes tags. All other JITs don't have this problem. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Fixes: 96eabe7a40aa ("bpf: Allow selecting numa node during map creation") Fixes: b52f00e6a715 ("x86: bpf_jit: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/uapi') diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 43ab5c402f98..f90860d1f897 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ union bpf_attr { * jump into another BPF program * @ctx: context pointer passed to next program * @prog_array_map: pointer to map which type is BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY - * @index: index inside array that selects specific program to run + * @index: 32-bit index inside array that selects specific program to run * Return: 0 on success or negative error * * int bpf_clone_redirect(skb, ifindex, flags) -- cgit