From 7065eefb38f16c91e9ace36fb7c873e4c9857c27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:09:20 -0800 Subject: bpf: rename MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE into __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE for consistency To stay consistent with the naming pattern used for similar cases in BPF UAPI (__MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE, etc), rename MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE into __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE. Also similar to MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE and MAX_BPF_REG, add: #define MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE Not all __MAX_xxx enums have such #define, so I'm not sure if we should add it or not, but I figured I'll start with a completely backwards compatible way, and we can drop that, if necessary. Also adjust a selftest that used MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE enum. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206190920.1651226-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 4df2d025c784..e0545201b55f 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -1108,9 +1108,11 @@ enum bpf_link_type { BPF_LINK_TYPE_TCX = 11, BPF_LINK_TYPE_UPROBE_MULTI = 12, BPF_LINK_TYPE_NETKIT = 13, - MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE, + __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE, }; +#define MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE __MAX_BPF_LINK_TYPE + enum bpf_perf_event_type { BPF_PERF_EVENT_UNSPEC = 0, BPF_PERF_EVENT_UPROBE = 1, -- cgit