From e92888c72fbdc6f9d07b3b0604c012e81d7c0da7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonghong Song Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 22:32:05 -0700 Subject: bpf: Enforce returning 0 for fentry/fexit progs Currently, tracing/fentry and tracing/fexit prog return values are not enforced. In trampoline codes, the fentry/fexit prog return values are ignored. Let us enforce it to be 0 to avoid confusion and allows potential future extension. This patch also explicitly added return value checking for tracing/raw_tp, tracing/fmod_ret, and freplace programs such that these program return values can be anything. The purpose are two folds: 1. to make it explicit about return value expectations for these programs in verifier. 2. for tracing prog_type, if a future attach type is added, the default is -ENOTSUPP which will enforce to specify return value ranges explicitly. Fixes: fec56f5890d9 ("bpf: Introduce BPF trampoline") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200514053206.1298415-1-yhs@fb.com --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index fa1d8245b925..a44ba6672688 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -7059,6 +7059,23 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return 0; range = tnum_const(0); break; + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING: + switch (env->prog->expected_attach_type) { + case BPF_TRACE_FENTRY: + case BPF_TRACE_FEXIT: + range = tnum_const(0); + break; + case BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP: + case BPF_MODIFY_RETURN: + return 0; + default: + return -ENOTSUPP; + } + break; + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT: + /* freplace program can return anything as its return value + * depends on the to-be-replaced kernel func or bpf program. + */ default: return 0; } -- cgit From 47cc0ed574abcbbde0cf143ddb21a0baed1aa2df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:11:17 +0200 Subject: bpf: Add bpf_probe_read_{user, kernel}_str() to do_refine_retval_range Given bpf_probe_read{,str}() BPF helpers are now only available under CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE, we need to add the drop-in replacements of bpf_probe_read_{kernel,user}_str() to do_refine_retval_range() as well to avoid hitting the same issue as in 849fa50662fbc ("bpf/verifier: refine retval R0 state for bpf_get_stack helper"). Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200515101118.6508-3-daniel@iogearbox.net --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index a44ba6672688..8d7ee40e2748 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -4340,7 +4340,9 @@ static void do_refine_retval_range(struct bpf_reg_state *regs, int ret_type, if (ret_type != RET_INTEGER || (func_id != BPF_FUNC_get_stack && - func_id != BPF_FUNC_probe_read_str)) + func_id != BPF_FUNC_probe_read_str && + func_id != BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel_str && + func_id != BPF_FUNC_probe_read_user_str)) return; ret_reg->smax_value = meta->msize_max_value; -- cgit