From d1a6edecc1fddfb6ef92c8f720631d2c02bf2744 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stanislav Fomichev Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 10:50:00 -0700 Subject: bpf: Check attach_func_proto more carefully in check_return_code Syzkaller reports the following crash: RIP: 0010:check_return_code kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10575 [inline] RIP: 0010:do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:12346 [inline] RIP: 0010:do_check_common+0xb3d2/0xd250 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:14610 With the following reproducer: bpf$PROG_LOAD_XDP(0x5, &(0x7f00000004c0)={0xd, 0x3, &(0x7f0000000000)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB="1800000000000019000000000000000095"], &(0x7f0000000300)='GPL\x00', 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, '\x00', 0x0, 0x2b, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0}, 0x80) Because we don't enforce expected_attach_type for XDP programs, we end up in hitting 'if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP' part in check_return_code and follow up with testing `prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type`, but `prog->aux->attach_func_proto` is NULL. Add explicit prog_type check for the "Note, BPF_LSM_CGROUP that attach ..." condition. Also, don't skip return code check for LSM/STRUCT_OPS. The above actually brings an issue with existing selftest which tries to return EPERM from void inet_csk_clone. Fix the test (and move called_socket_clone to make sure it's not incremented in case of an error) and add a new one to explicitly verify this condition. Fixes: 69fd337a975c ("bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor") Reported-by: syzbot+5cc0730bd4b4d2c5f152@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220708175000.2603078-1-sdf@google.com --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/bpf') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index df3ec6b05f05..e3cf6194c24f 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -10444,11 +10444,21 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) const bool is_subprog = frame->subprogno; /* LSM and struct_ops func-ptr's return type could be "void" */ - if (!is_subprog && - (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS || - prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) && - !prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type) - return 0; + if (!is_subprog) { + switch (prog_type) { + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM: + if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) + /* See below, can be 0 or 0-1 depending on hook. */ + break; + fallthrough; + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS: + if (!prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type) + return 0; + break; + default: + break; + } + } /* eBPF calling convention is such that R0 is used * to return the value from eBPF program. @@ -10572,6 +10582,7 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (!tnum_in(range, reg->var_off)) { verbose_invalid_scalar(env, reg, &range, "program exit", "R0"); if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP && + prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM && !prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type) verbose(env, "Note, BPF_LSM_CGROUP that attach to void LSM hooks can't modify return value!\n"); return -EINVAL; -- cgit