From 94ffac5d847cfd790bb37b7cef1cad803743985e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 09:04:07 +0200 Subject: futex: Fix small (and harmless looking) inconsistencies During (post-commit) review Darren spotted a few minor things. One (harmless AFAICT) type inconsistency and a comment that wasn't as clear as hoped. Reported-by: Darren Hart (VMWare) Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/futex.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/futex.c') diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 7ac167683c9f..ede2f1ef8511 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -1025,7 +1025,8 @@ static int attach_to_pi_state(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state **ps) { pid_t pid = uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK; - int ret, uval2; + u32 uval2; + int ret; /* * Userspace might have messed up non-PI and PI futexes [3] @@ -1441,6 +1442,11 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_ if (ret) goto out_unlock; + /* + * This is a point of no return; once we modify the uval there is no + * going back and subsequent operations must not fail. + */ + raw_spin_lock(&pi_state->owner->pi_lock); WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list)); list_del_init(&pi_state->list); @@ -1452,9 +1458,6 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_pi_state *pi_ pi_state->owner = new_owner; raw_spin_unlock(&new_owner->pi_lock); - /* - * We've updated the uservalue, this unlock cannot fail. - */ postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q); out_unlock: -- cgit