From 38c93587375053c5b9ef093f4a5ea754538cba32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:31:51 +0100 Subject: static_call: Fix static_call_update() sanity check Sites that match init_section_contains() get marked as INIT. For built-in code init_sections contains both __init and __exit text. OTOH kernel_text_address() only explicitly includes __init text (and there are no __exit text markers). Match what jump_label already does and ignore the warning for INIT sites. Also see the excellent changelog for commit: 8f35eaa5f2de ("jump_label: Don't warn on __exit jump entries") Fixes: 9183c3f9ed710 ("static_call: Add inline static call infrastructure") Reported-by: Sumit Garg Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Tested-by: Sumit Garg Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210318113610.739542434@infradead.org --- kernel/jump_label.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) (limited to 'kernel/jump_label.c') diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c index c6a39d662935..ba39fbb1f8e7 100644 --- a/kernel/jump_label.c +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c @@ -407,6 +407,14 @@ static bool jump_label_can_update(struct jump_entry *entry, bool init) return false; if (!kernel_text_address(jump_entry_code(entry))) { + /* + * This skips patching built-in __exit, which + * is part of init_section_contains() but is + * not part of kernel_text_address(). + * + * Skipping built-in __exit is fine since it + * will never be executed. + */ WARN_ONCE(!jump_entry_is_init(entry), "can't patch jump_label at %pS", (void *)jump_entry_code(entry)); -- cgit