From f83ee19be4272564ad592ef90145db7295229490 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:55:56 +0200 Subject: kthread: Simplify kthread_park() completion Oleg explains the reason we could hit park+park is that smpboot_update_cpumask_percpu_thread()'s for_each_cpu_and(cpu, &tmp, cpu_online_mask) smpboot_park_kthread(); turns into: for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask, (void)and) smpboot_park_kthread(); on UP, ignoring the mask. But since we just completely removed that function, this is no longer relevant. So revert commit: b1f5b378e126 ("kthread: Allow kthread_park() on a parked kthread") Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/kthread.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/kthread.c') diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c index 750cb8082694..11b591ee51ab 100644 --- a/kernel/kthread.c +++ b/kernel/kthread.c @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void __kthread_parkme(struct kthread *self) if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &self->flags)) break; - complete_all(&self->parked); + complete(&self->parked); schedule(); } __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); @@ -465,7 +465,6 @@ void kthread_unpark(struct task_struct *k) if (test_bit(KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU, &kthread->flags)) __kthread_bind(k, kthread->cpu, TASK_PARKED); - reinit_completion(&kthread->parked); clear_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags); /* * __kthread_parkme() will either see !SHOULD_PARK or get the wakeup. @@ -493,6 +492,9 @@ int kthread_park(struct task_struct *k) if (WARN_ON(k->flags & PF_EXITING)) return -ENOSYS; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags))) + return -EBUSY; + set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK, &kthread->flags); if (k != current) { wake_up_process(k); -- cgit