From 907dc16d7e23ec81a126c9585435494fa1b3a4b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Byungchul Park Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:00:52 +0900 Subject: locking/lockdep: Fix the rollback and overwrite detection logic in crossrelease As Boqun Feng pointed out, current->hist_id should be aligned with the latest valid xhlock->hist_id so that hist_id_save[] storing current->hist_id can be comparable with xhlock->hist_id. Fix it. Additionally, the condition for overwrite-detection should be the opposite. Fix the code and the comments as well. <- direction to visit hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh (h: history) ^^ ^ || start from here |previous entry current entry Reported-by: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: kirill@shutemov.name Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: npiggin@gmail.com Cc: walken@google.com Cc: willy@infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502694052-16085-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com [ Improve the comments some more. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/locking') diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 257931e2fbbe..66011c9f5df3 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -4853,7 +4853,7 @@ static void add_xhlock(struct held_lock *hlock) /* Initialize hist_lock's members */ xhlock->hlock = *hlock; - xhlock->hist_id = current->hist_id++; + xhlock->hist_id = ++current->hist_id; xhlock->trace.nr_entries = 0; xhlock->trace.max_entries = MAX_XHLOCK_TRACE_ENTRIES; @@ -5029,12 +5029,12 @@ static void commit_xhlocks(struct cross_lock *xlock) break; /* - * Filter out the cases that the ring buffer was - * overwritten and the previous entry has a bigger - * hist_id than the following one, which is impossible - * otherwise. + * Filter out the cases where the ring buffer was + * overwritten and the current entry has a bigger + * hist_id than the previous one, which is impossible + * otherwise: */ - if (unlikely(before(xhlock->hist_id, prev_hist_id))) + if (unlikely(before(prev_hist_id, xhlock->hist_id))) break; prev_hist_id = xhlock->hist_id; -- cgit