From a0c4acd2c220376b4e9690e75782d0c0afdaab9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:44:34 +0300
Subject: locking/rwsem-spinlock: Fix EINTR branch in __down_write_common()

If a writer could been woken up, the above branch

	if (sem->count == 0)
		break;

would have moved us to taking the sem. So, it's
not the time to wake a writer now, and only readers
are allowed now. Thus, 0 must be passed to __rwsem_do_wake().

Next, __rwsem_do_wake() wakes readers unconditionally.
But we mustn't do that if the sem is owned by writer
in the moment. Otherwise, writer and reader own the sem
the same time, which leads to memory corruption in
callers.

rwsem-xadd.c does not need that, as:

  1) the similar check is made lockless there,
  2) in __rwsem_mark_wake::try_reader_grant we test,

that sem is not owned by writer.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 17fcbd590d0c "locking/rwsem: Fix down_write_killable() for CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK=y"
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/149762063282.19811.9129615532201147826.stgit@localhost.localdomain
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'kernel/locking')

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
index c65f7989f850..20819df98125 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
@@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
 
 out_nolock:
 	list_del(&waiter.list);
-	if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
-		__rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1);
+	if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list) && sem->count >= 0)
+		__rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
 
 	return -EINTR;
-- 
cgit 


From 5671360f29c68d9079914438f6a0109ef62f82a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 04:56:58 +0900
Subject: locking/qspinlock: Explicitly include asm/prefetch.h

In architectures that use qspinlock, like x86, prefetch is loaded
indirectly via the asm/qspinlock.h include.  On other architectures, like
OpenRISC, which may want to use asm-generic/qspinlock.h the built will
fail without the asm/prefetch.h include.

Fix this by including directly.

Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170707195658.23840-1-shorne@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

(limited to 'kernel/locking')

diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index b2caec7315af..fd24153e8a48 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/prefetch.h>
 #include <asm/byteorder.h>
 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
 
-- 
cgit