From e117cb52bdb4d376b711bee34af6434c9e314b3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juri Lelli Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 09:29:48 +0200 Subject: sched/deadline: Fix switched_from_dl() warning Mark noticed that syzkaller is able to reliably trigger the following warning: dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 153 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:124 switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 1 PID: 153 Comm: syz-executor253 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc3+ #29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x458 show_stack+0x20/0x30 dump_stack+0x180/0x250 panic+0x2dc/0x4ec __warn_printk+0x0/0x150 report_bug+0x228/0x2d8 bug_handler+0xa0/0x1a0 brk_handler+0x2f0/0x568 do_debug_exception+0x1bc/0x5d0 el1_dbg+0x18/0x78 switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608 __sched_setscheduler+0x8cc/0x2018 sys_sched_setattr+0x340/0x758 el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34 syzkaller reproducer runs a bunch of threads that constantly switch between DEADLINE and NORMAL classes while interacting through futexes. The splat above is caused by the fact that if a DEADLINE task is setattr back to NORMAL while in non_contending state (blocked on a futex - inactive timer armed), its contribution to running_bw is not removed before sub_rq_bw() gets called (!task_on_rq_queued() branch) and the latter sees running_bw > this_bw. Fix it by removing a task contribution from running_bw if the task is not queued and in non_contending state while switched to a different class. Reported-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180711072948.27061-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/sched/deadline.c') diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index fbfc3f1d368a..10c7b51c0d1f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -2290,8 +2290,17 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && p->dl.dl_runtime) task_non_contending(p); - if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) { + /* + * Inactive timer is armed. However, p is leaving DEADLINE and + * might migrate away from this rq while continuing to run on + * some other class. We need to remove its contribution from + * this rq running_bw now, or sub_rq_bw (below) will complain. + */ + if (p->dl.dl_non_contending) + sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl); sub_rq_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl); + } /* * We cannot use inactive_task_timer() to invoke sub_running_bw() -- cgit From 840d719604b0925ca23dde95f1767e4528668369 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 11:16:30 +0200 Subject: sched/deadline: Update rq_clock of later_rq when pushing a task Daniel Casini got this warn while running a DL task here at RetisLab: [ 461.137582] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 461.137583] rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP [ 461.137599] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2354 at kernel/sched/sched.h:967 assert_clock_updated.isra.32.part.33+0x17/0x20 [a ton of modules] [ 461.137646] CPU: 4 PID: 2354 Comm: label_image Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #3 [ 461.137647] Hardware name: ASUS All Series/Z87-K, BIOS 0801 09/02/2013 [ 461.137649] RIP: 0010:assert_clock_updated.isra.32.part.33+0x17/0x20 [ 461.137649] Code: ff 48 89 83 08 09 00 00 eb c6 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 c7 c7 98 7a 6c a5 c6 05 bc 0d 54 01 01 48 89 e5 e8 a9 84 fb ff <0f> 0b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 7e 60 01 74 0a 48 3b [ 461.137673] RSP: 0018:ffffa77e08cafc68 EFLAGS: 00010082 [ 461.137674] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8b3fc1702d80 RCX: 0000000000000006 [ 461.137674] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000096 RDI: ffff8b3fded164b0 [ 461.137675] RBP: ffffa77e08cafc68 R08: 0000000000000026 R09: 0000000000000339 [ 461.137676] R10: ffff8b3fd060d410 R11: 0000000000000026 R12: ffffffffa4e14e20 [ 461.137677] R13: ffff8b3fdec22940 R14: ffff8b3fc1702da0 R15: ffff8b3fdec22940 [ 461.137678] FS: 00007efe43ee5700(0000) GS:ffff8b3fded00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 461.137679] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 461.137680] CR2: 00007efe30000010 CR3: 0000000301744003 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 461.137680] Call Trace: [ 461.137684] push_dl_task.part.46+0x3bc/0x460 [ 461.137686] task_woken_dl+0x60/0x80 [ 461.137689] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x4f/0x150 [ 461.137690] ttwu_do_activate+0x77/0x80 [ 461.137692] try_to_wake_up+0x1d6/0x4c0 [ 461.137693] wake_up_q+0x32/0x70 [ 461.137696] do_futex+0x7e7/0xb50 [ 461.137698] __x64_sys_futex+0x8b/0x180 [ 461.137701] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 461.137703] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 461.137705] RIP: 0033:0x7efe4918ca26 [ 461.137705] Code: 00 00 00 74 17 49 8b 48 20 44 8b 59 10 41 83 e3 30 41 83 fb 20 74 1e be 85 00 00 00 41 ba 01 00 00 00 41 b9 01 00 00 04 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 1f 31 c0 c3 be 8c 00 00 00 49 89 c8 4d 31 d2 [ 461.137738] RSP: 002b:00007efe43ee4928 EFLAGS: 00000283 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca [ 461.137739] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000005094df0 RCX: 00007efe4918ca26 [ 461.137740] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000085 RDI: 0000000005094e24 [ 461.137741] RBP: 00007efe43ee49c0 R08: 0000000005094e20 R09: 0000000004000001 [ 461.137741] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000283 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 461.137742] R13: 0000000005094df8 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000448a10 [ 461.137743] ---[ end trace 187df4cad2bf7649 ]--- This warning happened in the push_dl_task(), because __add_running_bw()->cpufreq_update_util() is getting the rq_clock of the later_rq before its update, which takes place at activate_task(). The fix then is to update the rq_clock before calling add_running_bw(). To avoid double rq_clock_update() call, we set ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK flag to activate_task(). Reported-by: Daniel Casini Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Juri Lelli Cc: Clark Williams Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Luca Abeni Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta Fixes: e0367b12674b sched/deadline: Move CPU frequency selection triggering points Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ca31d073a4788acf0684a8b255f14fea775ccf20.1532077269.git.bristot@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/sched/deadline.c') diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 10c7b51c0d1f..b5fbdde6afa9 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -2090,8 +2090,14 @@ retry: sub_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl); set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu); add_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl); + + /* + * Update the later_rq clock here, because the clock is used + * by the cpufreq_update_util() inside __add_running_bw(). + */ + update_rq_clock(later_rq); add_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl); - activate_task(later_rq, next_task, 0); + activate_task(later_rq, next_task, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK); ret = 1; resched_curr(later_rq); -- cgit