From 7364e86547bc52a555c9317b32cc4e81c4d4fd7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wang Long Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:11:13 +0000 Subject: ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong param in module_param The {producer|consumer}_{nice|fifo} parameters are integer type, we should use 'int' as the second param in module_param. For example(consumer_fifo): the default value of consumer_fifo is -1. Without this patch: # cat /sys/module/ring_buffer_benchmark/parameters/consumer_fifo 4294967295 With this patch: # cat /sys/module/ring_buffer_benchmark/parameters/consumer_fifo -1 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923873-67712-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Wang Long Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/trace') diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c index 13d945c0d03f..cdff7d3df902 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c @@ -46,16 +46,16 @@ static int consumer_nice = MAX_NICE; static int producer_fifo = -1; static int consumer_fifo = -1; -module_param(producer_nice, uint, 0644); +module_param(producer_nice, int, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(producer_nice, "nice prio for producer"); -module_param(consumer_nice, uint, 0644); +module_param(consumer_nice, int, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(consumer_nice, "nice prio for consumer"); -module_param(producer_fifo, uint, 0644); +module_param(producer_fifo, int, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(producer_fifo, "fifo prio for producer"); -module_param(consumer_fifo, uint, 0644); +module_param(consumer_fifo, int, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(consumer_fifo, "fifo prio for consumer"); static int read_events; -- cgit