From 7adfc6c9b315e174cf8743b21b7b691c8766791b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 00:05:59 -0700 Subject: bpf: Add bpf_get_attach_cookie() BPF helper to access bpf_cookie value Add new BPF helper, bpf_get_attach_cookie(), which can be used by BPF programs to get access to a user-provided bpf_cookie value, specified during BPF program attachment (BPF link creation) time. Naming is hard, though. With the concept being named "BPF cookie", I've considered calling the helper: - bpf_get_cookie() -- seems too unspecific and easily mistaken with socket cookie; - bpf_get_bpf_cookie() -- too much tautology; - bpf_get_link_cookie() -- would be ok, but while we create a BPF link to attach BPF program to BPF hook, it's still an "attachment" and the bpf_cookie is associated with BPF program attachment to a hook, not a BPF link itself. Technically, we could support bpf_cookie with old-style cgroup programs.So I ultimately rejected it in favor of bpf_get_attach_cookie(). Currently all perf_event-backed BPF program types support bpf_get_attach_cookie() helper. Follow-up patches will add support for fentry/fexit programs as well. While at it, mark bpf_tracing_func_proto() as static to make it obvious that it's only used from within the kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815070609.987780-7-andrii@kernel.org --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/trace') diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 57879d28f824..cbc73c08c4a4 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -975,7 +975,34 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_func_ip_proto_kprobe = { .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, }; -const struct bpf_func_proto * +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_get_attach_cookie_trace, void *, ctx) +{ + struct bpf_trace_run_ctx *run_ctx; + + run_ctx = container_of(current->bpf_ctx, struct bpf_trace_run_ctx, run_ctx); + return run_ctx->bpf_cookie; +} + +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_trace = { + .func = bpf_get_attach_cookie_trace, + .gpl_only = false, + .ret_type = RET_INTEGER, + .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, +}; + +BPF_CALL_1(bpf_get_attach_cookie_pe, struct bpf_perf_event_data_kern *, ctx) +{ + return ctx->event->bpf_cookie; +} + +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_pe = { + .func = bpf_get_attach_cookie_pe, + .gpl_only = false, + .ret_type = RET_INTEGER, + .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, +}; + +static const struct bpf_func_proto * bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) { switch (func_id) { @@ -1109,6 +1136,8 @@ kprobe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) #endif case BPF_FUNC_get_func_ip: return &bpf_get_func_ip_proto_kprobe; + case BPF_FUNC_get_attach_cookie: + return &bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_trace; default: return bpf_tracing_func_proto(func_id, prog); } @@ -1219,6 +1248,8 @@ tp_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) return &bpf_get_stackid_proto_tp; case BPF_FUNC_get_stack: return &bpf_get_stack_proto_tp; + case BPF_FUNC_get_attach_cookie: + return &bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_trace; default: return bpf_tracing_func_proto(func_id, prog); } @@ -1326,6 +1357,8 @@ pe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog) return &bpf_perf_prog_read_value_proto; case BPF_FUNC_read_branch_records: return &bpf_read_branch_records_proto; + case BPF_FUNC_get_attach_cookie: + return &bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_pe; default: return bpf_tracing_func_proto(func_id, prog); } -- cgit