From 1b02cd6a2d7f3e2a6a5262887d2cb2912083e42f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: luca abeni Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:15:30 +0100 Subject: sched/deadline: Correctly handle active 0-lag timers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit syzbot reported the following warning: [ ] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 17089 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:255 task_non_contending+0xae0/0x1950 line 255 of deadline.c is: WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)); in task_non_contending(). Unfortunately, in some cases (for example, a deadline task continuosly blocking and waking immediately) it can happen that a task blocks (and task_non_contending() is called) while the 0-lag timer is still active. In this case, the safest thing to do is to immediately decrease the running bandwidth of the task, without trying to re-arm the 0-lag timer. Signed-off-by: luca abeni Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: chengjian (D) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190325131530.34706-1-luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/deadline.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index 6a73e41a2016..43901fa3f269 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct task_struct *p) if (dl_entity_is_special(dl_se)) return; - WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)); WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_non_contending); zerolag_time = dl_se->deadline - @@ -269,7 +268,7 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct task_struct *p) * If the "0-lag time" already passed, decrease the active * utilization now, instead of starting a timer */ - if (zerolag_time < 0) { + if ((zerolag_time < 0) || hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)) { if (dl_task(p)) sub_running_bw(dl_se, dl_rq); if (!dl_task(p) || p->state == TASK_DEAD) { -- cgit