From 8b39adbee805c539a461dbf208b125b096152b1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bart Van Assche Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:05:38 -0700 Subject: locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again If lockdep_register_key() and lockdep_unregister_key() are called with debug_locks == false then the following warning is reported: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 15145 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4920 lockdep_unregister_key+0x1ad/0x240 That warning is reported because lockdep_unregister_key() ignores the value of 'debug_locks' and because the behavior of lockdep_register_key() depends on whether or not 'debug_locks' is set. Fix this inconsistency by making lockdep_unregister_key() take 'debug_locks' again into account. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Will Deacon Cc: shenghui Fixes: 90c1cba2b3b3 ("locking/lockdep: Zap lock classes even with lock debugging disabled") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190415170538.23491-1-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index e16766ff184b..e221be724fe8 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -4907,8 +4907,9 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key) return; raw_local_irq_save(flags); - arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock); - current->lockdep_recursion = 1; + if (!graph_lock()) + goto out_irq; + pf = get_pending_free(); hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(k, hash_head, hash_entry) { if (k == key) { @@ -4920,8 +4921,8 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key) WARN_ON_ONCE(!found); __lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1); call_rcu_zapped(pf); - current->lockdep_recursion = 0; - arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock); + graph_unlock(); +out_irq: raw_local_irq_restore(flags); /* Wait until is_dynamic_key() has finished accessing k->hash_entry. */ -- cgit