From 0933840acf7b65d6d30a5b6089d882afea57aca3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:10:11 +0200 Subject: perf/core: Protect PMU device removal with a 'pmu_bus_running' check, to fix CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE=y kernel panic CAI Qian reported a crash in the PMU uncore device removal code, enabled by the CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE=y option: https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147688837328451 The reason for the crash is that perf_pmu_unregister() tries to remove a PMU device which is not added at this point. We add PMU devices only after pmu_bus is registered, which happens in the perf_event_sysfs_init() call and sets the 'pmu_bus_running' flag. The fix is to get the 'pmu_bus_running' flag state at the point the PMU is taken out of the PMU list and remove the device later only if it's set. Reported-by: CAI Qian Tested-by: CAI Qian Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kan Liang Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161020111011.GA13361@krava Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/events/core.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index c6e47e97b33f..a5d2e62faf7e 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -8855,7 +8855,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_register); void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu) { + int remove_device; + mutex_lock(&pmus_lock); + remove_device = pmu_bus_running; list_del_rcu(&pmu->entry); mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock); @@ -8869,10 +8872,12 @@ void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu) free_percpu(pmu->pmu_disable_count); if (pmu->type >= PERF_TYPE_MAX) idr_remove(&pmu_idr, pmu->type); - if (pmu->nr_addr_filters) - device_remove_file(pmu->dev, &dev_attr_nr_addr_filters); - device_del(pmu->dev); - put_device(pmu->dev); + if (remove_device) { + if (pmu->nr_addr_filters) + device_remove_file(pmu->dev, &dev_attr_nr_addr_filters); + device_del(pmu->dev); + put_device(pmu->dev); + } free_pmu_context(pmu); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_unregister); -- cgit From 5aab90ce1ec449912a2ebc4d45e0c85dac29e9dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:48:24 +0200 Subject: perf/powerpc: Don't call perf_event_disable() from atomic context The trinity syscall fuzzer triggered following WARN() on powerpc: WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 2998 at arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:278 ... NIP [c00000000093aedc] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x28c/0x2b0 LR [c00000000093aed8] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x288/0x2b0 Call Trace: [c0000002f7933580] [c00000000093aed8] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x288/0x2b0 (unreliable) [c0000002f7933630] [c0000000000f671c] .notifier_call_chain+0x7c/0xf0 [c0000002f79336d0] [c0000000000f6abc] .__atomic_notifier_call_chain+0xbc/0x1c0 [c0000002f7933780] [c0000000000f6c40] .notify_die+0x70/0xd0 [c0000002f7933820] [c00000000001a74c] .do_break+0x4c/0x100 [c0000002f7933920] [c0000000000089fc] handle_dabr_fault+0x14/0x48 Followed by a lockdep warning: =============================== [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] 4.8.0-rc5+ #7 Tainted: G W ------------------------------- ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:556 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0 2 locks held by ls/2998: #0: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [] .__atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0x1c0 #1: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x0/0x2b0 stack backtrace: CPU: 9 PID: 2998 Comm: ls Tainted: G W 4.8.0-rc5+ #7 Call Trace: [c0000002f7933150] [c00000000094b1f8] .dump_stack+0xe0/0x14c (unreliable) [c0000002f79331e0] [c00000000013c468] .lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x138/0x180 [c0000002f7933270] [c0000000001005d8] .___might_sleep+0x278/0x2e0 [c0000002f7933300] [c000000000935584] .mutex_lock_nested+0x64/0x5a0 [c0000002f7933410] [c00000000023084c] .perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0x16c/0x380 [c0000002f7933500] [c000000000230a80] .perf_event_disable+0x20/0x60 [c0000002f7933580] [c00000000093aeec] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x29c/0x2b0 [c0000002f7933630] [c0000000000f671c] .notifier_call_chain+0x7c/0xf0 [c0000002f79336d0] [c0000000000f6abc] .__atomic_notifier_call_chain+0xbc/0x1c0 [c0000002f7933780] [c0000000000f6c40] .notify_die+0x70/0xd0 [c0000002f7933820] [c00000000001a74c] .do_break+0x4c/0x100 [c0000002f7933920] [c0000000000089fc] handle_dabr_fault+0x14/0x48 While it looks like the first WARN() is probably valid, the other one is triggered by disabling event via perf_event_disable() from atomic context. The event is disabled here in case we were not able to emulate the instruction that hit the breakpoint. By disabling the event we unschedule the event and make sure it's not scheduled back. But we can't call perf_event_disable() from atomic context, instead we need to use the event's pending_disable irq_work method to disable it. Reported-by: Jan Stancek Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Huang Ying Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Neuling Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161026094824.GA21397@krava Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/events/core.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index a5d2e62faf7e..0e292132efac 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -1960,6 +1960,12 @@ void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_disable); +void perf_event_disable_inatomic(struct perf_event *event) +{ + event->pending_disable = 1; + irq_work_queue(&event->pending); +} + static void perf_set_shadow_time(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx, u64 tstamp) @@ -7075,8 +7081,8 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event, if (events && atomic_dec_and_test(&event->event_limit)) { ret = 1; event->pending_kill = POLL_HUP; - event->pending_disable = 1; - irq_work_queue(&event->pending); + + perf_event_disable_inatomic(event); } READ_ONCE(event->overflow_handler)(event, data, regs); -- cgit