From 54f93336d000229f72c26d8a3f69dd256b744528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ziyang Xuan Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:08:19 +0800 Subject: can: raw: raw_setsockopt(): fix raw_rcv panic for sock UAF We get a bug during ltp can_filter test as following. =========================================== [60919.264984] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 [60919.265223] PGD 8000003dda726067 P4D 8000003dda726067 PUD 3dda727067 PMD 0 [60919.265443] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [60919.265550] CPU: 30 PID: 3638365 Comm: can_filter Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.19.90+ #1 [60919.266068] RIP: 0010:selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x3e/0x200 [60919.293289] RSP: 0018:ffff8d53bfc03cf8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [60919.307140] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000001d RCX: 0000000000000007 [60919.320756] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff8d5104a8ed00 RDI: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.334319] RBP: ffff8d9338056800 R08: ffff8d53bfc29d80 R09: 0000000000000001 [60919.347969] R10: ffff8d53bfc03ec0 R11: ffffb8526ef47c98 R12: ffff8d53bfc03d30 [60919.350320] perf: interrupt took too long (3063 > 2500), lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 65000 [60919.361148] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8d53bcf90000 R15: 0000000000000000 [60919.361151] FS: 00007fb78b6b3600(0000) GS:ffff8d53bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [60919.400812] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [60919.413730] CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000003e3f784006 CR4: 00000000007606e0 [60919.426479] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [60919.439339] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [60919.451608] PKRU: 55555554 [60919.463622] Call Trace: [60919.475617] [60919.487122] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.498478] ? update_load_avg+0x89/0x5d0 [60919.509822] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0 [60919.520709] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x2a/0x40 [60919.531413] sk_filter_trim_cap+0x47/0x1b0 [60919.542178] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x38/0x1b0 [60919.552444] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x17/0x30 [60919.562477] raw_rcv+0x110/0x190 [can_raw] [60919.572539] can_rcv_filter+0xbc/0x1b0 [can] [60919.582173] can_receive+0x6b/0xb0 [can] [60919.591595] can_rcv+0x31/0x70 [can] [60919.600783] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x5a/0x80 [60919.609864] process_backlog+0x9b/0x150 [60919.618691] net_rx_action+0x156/0x400 [60919.627310] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xa0 [60919.635714] __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e9 [60919.644161] do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40 [60919.652154] [60919.659899] do_softirq.part.17+0x4f/0x60 [60919.667475] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x60/0x70 [60919.675089] __dev_queue_xmit+0x539/0x920 [60919.682267] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.689218] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 [60919.695886] ? sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x211/0x230 [60919.702395] ? can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.708882] can_send+0xe5/0x1f0 [can] [60919.715037] raw_sendmsg+0x16d/0x268 [can_raw] It's because raw_setsockopt() concurrently with unregister_netdevice_many(). Concurrent scenario as following. cpu0 cpu1 raw_bind raw_setsockopt unregister_netdevice_many unlist_netdevice dev_get_by_index raw_notifier raw_enable_filters ...... can_rx_register can_rcv_list_find(..., net->can.rx_alldev_list) ...... sock_close raw_release(sock_a) ...... can_receive can_rcv_filter(net->can.rx_alldev_list, ...) raw_rcv(skb, sock_a) BUG After unlist_netdevice(), dev_get_by_index() return NULL in raw_setsockopt(). Function raw_enable_filters() will add sock and can_filter to net->can.rx_alldev_list. Then the sock is closed. Followed by, we sock_sendmsg() to a new vcan device use the same can_filter. Protocol stack match the old receiver whose sock has been released on net->can.rx_alldev_list in can_rcv_filter(). Function raw_rcv() uses the freed sock. UAF BUG is triggered. We can find that the key issue is that net_device has not been protected in raw_setsockopt(). Use rtnl_lock to protect net_device in raw_setsockopt(). Fixes: c18ce101f2e4 ("[CAN]: Add raw protocol") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210722070819.1048263-1-william.xuanziyang@huawei.com Cc: linux-stable Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- net/can/raw.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/can') diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c index ed4fcb7ab0c3..cd5a49380116 100644 --- a/net/can/raw.c +++ b/net/can/raw.c @@ -546,10 +546,18 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, return -EFAULT; } + rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk); - if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) + if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); + if (!dev) { + if (count > 1) + kfree(filter); + err = -ENODEV; + goto out_fil; + } + } if (ro->bound) { /* (try to) register the new filters */ @@ -588,6 +596,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev); release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock(); break; @@ -600,10 +609,16 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, err_mask &= CAN_ERR_MASK; + rtnl_lock(); lock_sock(sk); - if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) + if (ro->bound && ro->ifindex) { dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), ro->ifindex); + if (!dev) { + err = -ENODEV; + goto out_err; + } + } /* remove current error mask */ if (ro->bound) { @@ -627,6 +642,7 @@ static int raw_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, dev_put(dev); release_sock(sk); + rtnl_unlock(); break; -- cgit From 0c71437dd50dd687c15d8ca80b3b68f10bb21d63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleksij Rempel Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:16:02 +0200 Subject: can: j1939: j1939_session_deactivate(): clarify lifetime of session object The j1939_session_deactivate() is decrementing the session ref-count and potentially can free() the session. This would cause use-after-free situation. However, the code calling j1939_session_deactivate() does always hold another reference to the session, so that it would not be free()ed in this code path. This patch adds a comment to make this clear and a WARN_ON, to ensure that future changes will not violate this requirement. Further this patch avoids dereferencing the session pointer as a precaution to avoid use-after-free if the session is actually free()ed. Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210714111602.24021-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de Reported-by: Xiaochen Zou Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- net/can/j1939/transport.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/can') diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c index c3946c355882..bb1092c3e7e3 100644 --- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c +++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c @@ -1075,11 +1075,16 @@ static bool j1939_session_deactivate_locked(struct j1939_session *session) static bool j1939_session_deactivate(struct j1939_session *session) { + struct j1939_priv *priv = session->priv; bool active; - j1939_session_list_lock(session->priv); + j1939_session_list_lock(priv); + /* This function should be called with a session ref-count of at + * least 2. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(kref_read(&session->kref) < 2); active = j1939_session_deactivate_locked(session); - j1939_session_list_unlock(session->priv); + j1939_session_list_unlock(priv); return active; } -- cgit From c6eea1c8bda56737752465a298dc6ce07d6b8ce3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhang Changzhong Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 19:00:08 +0800 Subject: can: j1939: j1939_xtp_rx_dat_one(): fix rxtimer value between consecutive TP.DT to 750ms For receive side, the max time interval between two consecutive TP.DT should be 750ms. Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1625569210-47506-1-git-send-email-zhangchangzhong@huawei.com Cc: linux-stable Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde --- net/can/j1939/transport.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/can') diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c index bb1092c3e7e3..bdc95bd7a851 100644 --- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c +++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c @@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ static void j1939_xtp_rx_dat_one(struct j1939_session *session, if (!session->transmission) j1939_tp_schedule_txtimer(session, 0); } else { - j1939_tp_set_rxtimeout(session, 250); + j1939_tp_set_rxtimeout(session, 750); } session->last_cmd = 0xff; consume_skb(se_skb); -- cgit