From ee72b9fddb41a2087b4a7aa74791ef1700f3f6cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:58:06 +0000 Subject: rxrpc: Use ACCESS_ONCE() when accessing circular buffer pointers Use ACCESS_ONCE() when accessing the other-end pointer into a circular buffer as it's possible the other-end pointer might change whilst we're doing this, and if we access it twice, we might get some weird things happening. Signed-off-by: David Howells --- net/rxrpc/ar-output.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/rxrpc') diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-output.c b/net/rxrpc/ar-output.c index 353f5c9141ea..14c8df6b7f41 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/ar-output.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-output.c @@ -401,7 +401,8 @@ static int rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, int ret; _enter(",{%d},%ld", - CIRC_SPACE(call->acks_head, call->acks_tail, call->acks_winsz), + CIRC_SPACE(call->acks_head, ACCESS_ONCE(call->acks_tail), + call->acks_winsz), *timeo); add_wait_queue(&call->tx_waitq, &myself); @@ -409,7 +410,7 @@ static int rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, for (;;) { set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); ret = 0; - if (CIRC_SPACE(call->acks_head, call->acks_tail, + if (CIRC_SPACE(call->acks_head, ACCESS_ONCE(call->acks_tail), call->acks_winsz) > 0) break; if (signal_pending(current)) { @@ -570,7 +571,8 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, _debug("alloc"); - if (CIRC_SPACE(call->acks_head, call->acks_tail, + if (CIRC_SPACE(call->acks_head, + ACCESS_ONCE(call->acks_tail), call->acks_winsz) <= 0) { ret = -EAGAIN; if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT) @@ -686,7 +688,8 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, sp->hdr.flags = conn->out_clientflag; if (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more) sp->hdr.flags |= RXRPC_LAST_PACKET; - else if (CIRC_SPACE(call->acks_head, call->acks_tail, + else if (CIRC_SPACE(call->acks_head, + ACCESS_ONCE(call->acks_tail), call->acks_winsz) > 1) sp->hdr.flags |= RXRPC_MORE_PACKETS; if (more && seq & 1) -- cgit