From b2c4618162ec615a15883a804cce7e27afecfa58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jussi Maki Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 13:47:36 -0700 Subject: bpf, sockmap: sk_skb data_end access incorrect when src_reg = dst_reg The current conversion of skb->data_end reads like this: ; data_end = (void*)(long)skb->data_end; 559: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 +200) ; r1 = skb->data 560: (61) r11 = *(u32 *)(r2 +112) ; r11 = skb->len 561: (0f) r1 += r11 562: (61) r11 = *(u32 *)(r2 +116) 563: (1f) r1 -= r11 But similar to the case in 84f44df664e9 ("bpf: sock_ops sk access may stomp registers when dst_reg = src_reg"), the code will read an incorrect skb->len when src == dst. In this case we end up generating this xlated code: ; data_end = (void*)(long)skb->data_end; 559: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +200) ; r1 = skb->data 560: (61) r11 = *(u32 *)(r1 +112) ; r11 = (skb->data)->len 561: (0f) r1 += r11 562: (61) r11 = *(u32 *)(r1 +116) 563: (1f) r1 -= r11 ... where line 560 is the reading 4B of (skb->data + 112) instead of the intended skb->len Here the skb pointer in r1 gets set to skb->data and the later deref for skb->len ends up following skb->data instead of skb. This fixes the issue similarly to the patch mentioned above by creating an additional temporary variable and using to store the register when dst_reg = src_reg. We name the variable bpf_temp_reg and place it in the cb context for sk_skb. Then we restore from the temp to ensure nothing is lost. Fixes: 16137b09a66f2 ("bpf: Compute data_end dynamically with JIT code") Signed-off-by: Jussi Maki Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103204736.248403-6-john.fastabend@gmail.com --- net/core/filter.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'net') diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index c3936d0724b8..e471c9b09670 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -9756,22 +9756,46 @@ static u32 sock_ops_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, static struct bpf_insn *bpf_convert_data_end_access(const struct bpf_insn *si, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - /* si->dst_reg = skb->data */ + int reg; + int temp_reg_off = offsetof(struct sk_buff, cb) + + offsetof(struct sk_skb_cb, temp_reg); + + if (si->src_reg == si->dst_reg) { + /* We need an extra register, choose and save a register. */ + reg = BPF_REG_9; + if (si->src_reg == reg || si->dst_reg == reg) + reg--; + if (si->src_reg == reg || si->dst_reg == reg) + reg--; + *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, si->src_reg, reg, temp_reg_off); + } else { + reg = si->dst_reg; + } + + /* reg = skb->data */ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, data), - si->dst_reg, si->src_reg, + reg, si->src_reg, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data)); /* AX = skb->len */ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, len), BPF_REG_AX, si->src_reg, offsetof(struct sk_buff, len)); - /* si->dst_reg = skb->data + skb->len */ - *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, si->dst_reg, BPF_REG_AX); + /* reg = skb->data + skb->len */ + *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, reg, BPF_REG_AX); /* AX = skb->data_len */ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(struct sk_buff, data_len), BPF_REG_AX, si->src_reg, offsetof(struct sk_buff, data_len)); - /* si->dst_reg = skb->data + skb->len - skb->data_len */ - *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, si->dst_reg, BPF_REG_AX); + + /* reg = skb->data + skb->len - skb->data_len */ + *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, reg, BPF_REG_AX); + + if (si->src_reg == si->dst_reg) { + /* Restore the saved register */ + *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_AX, si->src_reg); + *insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(si->dst_reg, reg); + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, reg, BPF_REG_AX, temp_reg_off); + } return insn; } -- cgit