From fe420d87bbc234015b4195dd239b7d3052b140ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Siewior Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 19:24:00 +0200 Subject: net/core: remove explicit do_softirq() from busy_poll_stop() Since commit 217f69743681 ("net: busy-poll: allow preemption in sk_busy_loop()") there is an explicit do_softirq() invocation after local_bh_enable() has been invoked. I don't understand why we need this because local_bh_enable() will invoke do_softirq() once the softirq counter reached zero and we have softirq-related work pending. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/dev.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'net') diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 6d60149287a1..7243421c9783 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -5206,8 +5206,6 @@ static void busy_poll_stop(struct napi_struct *napi, void *have_poll_lock) if (rc == BUSY_POLL_BUDGET) __napi_schedule(napi); local_bh_enable(); - if (local_softirq_pending()) - do_softirq(); } void napi_busy_loop(unsigned int napi_id, -- cgit