From eed9de3b4f47114f440980203ca27c5fab70f529 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nikolay Borisov Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:31:40 +0200 Subject: ima: Use inode_is_open_for_write Use the aptly named function rather than open coding the check. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'security/integrity') diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index df0b2ee49fa2..bd9bd5f88206 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void ima_rdwr_violation_check(struct file *file, } else { if (must_measure) set_bit(IMA_MUST_MEASURE, &iint->atomic_flags); - if ((atomic_read(&inode->i_writecount) > 0) && must_measure) + if (inode_is_open_for_write(inode) && must_measure) send_writers = true; } -- cgit