From 7c32ae35fbf9cffb7aa3736f44dec10c944ca18e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Takashi Iwai Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:37:19 +0200 Subject: ALSA: seq: Cover unsubscribe_port() in list_mutex The call of unsubscribe_port() which manages the group count and module refcount from delete_and_unsubscribe_port() looks racy; it's not covered by the group list lock, and it's likely a cause of the reported unbalance at port deletion. Let's move the call inside the group list_mutex to plug the hole. Reported-by: syzbot+e4c8abb920efa77bace9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai --- sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'sound/core/seq') diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c index d964d728681e..ac7556ab531c 100644 --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c @@ -547,10 +547,10 @@ static void delete_and_unsubscribe_port(struct snd_seq_client *client, list_del_init(list); grp->exclusive = 0; write_unlock_irq(&grp->list_lock); - up_write(&grp->list_mutex); if (!empty) unsubscribe_port(client, port, grp, &subs->info, ack); + up_write(&grp->list_mutex); } /* connect two ports */ -- cgit