From 2a6f0892bda954dc2688b002060093ee0fe38528 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kuninori Morimoto Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:16:29 +0900 Subject: ASoC: soc-core: call snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at soc_cleanup_card_resources() It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. snd_soc_bind_card() is calling snd_soc_dapm_init() for both card and component. Let's call paired snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at paired soc_cleanup_card_resources(). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r22c4lub.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- sound/soc/soc-core.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'sound/soc') diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index 92260a9569a2..216000ae3e20 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -1953,6 +1953,8 @@ static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card) card->snd_card = NULL; } + snd_soc_dapm_shutdown(card); + /* remove and free each DAI */ soc_remove_link_dais(card); @@ -2389,7 +2391,6 @@ static void snd_soc_unbind_card(struct snd_soc_card *card, bool unregister) { if (card->instantiated) { card->instantiated = false; - snd_soc_dapm_shutdown(card); snd_soc_flush_all_delayed_work(card); soc_cleanup_card_resources(card); -- cgit