From 3930198dc9a0720a2b6561c67e55859ec51b73f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Leoshkevich Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 03:08:27 +0200 Subject: libbpf: Use __BYTE_ORDER__ Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined __BYTE_ORDER for consistency. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211026010831.748682-3-iii@linux.ibm.com --- tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/lib/bpf/btf.c') diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c index ef924fc2c911..0c628c33e23b 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c @@ -538,9 +538,9 @@ int btf__set_pointer_size(struct btf *btf, size_t ptr_sz) static bool is_host_big_endian(void) { -#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ return false; -#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN +#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ return true; #else # error "Unrecognized __BYTE_ORDER__" -- cgit