| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It is not possible for cached_resolved_idx to be invalid here as the
cpufreq core always sets index to a positive value.
Change its type to unsigned int and fix qcom usage a bit.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
Add support for CPU frequency scaling on Tegra194. The frequency
of each core can be adjusted by writing a clock divisor value to
a MSR on the core. The range of valid divisors is queried from
the BPMP.
Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
When probing cpufreq for iMX6 the values in the efuse needs to be
read which requires NVMEM_IMX_OCOTP. If this option is not enabled,
the probe will be deferred forever and cpufreq won't be available.
This patch forces the selection of the required configuration option.
Signed-off-by: Walter Lozano <walter.lozano@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
Kerneldoc format for attribute descriptions should be '@.*: '.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/sti-cpufreq.c:49: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct sti_cpufreq_ddata '
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
Cc: Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
We always put the reference to BPMP device on exit of the Tegra186
CPUFREQ driver and so there is no need to have separate exit paths
for success and failure. Therefore, simplify the probe return path
in the Tegra186 CPUFREQ driver by combining the success and failure
paths.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
The 'caps' variable has been defined in cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf() and
cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz() routines, so there is no need to get
'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', we can use
'caps->highest_perf' instead.
Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
[ Viresh: Updated commit log ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
The Armada 8K cpufreq driver needs the Armada AP CPU CLK
to work. This dependency is currently not satisfied and
the ARMADA_AP_CPU_CLK can not be selected independently.
Add it to the cpufreq Armada8k driver.
Fixes: f525a670533d ("cpufreq: ap806: add cpufreq driver for Armada 8K")
Signed-off-by: Sven Auhagen <sven.auhagen@voleatech.de>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
With the current approach we have an extra check in the
cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() callback, which checks if hisilicon's get rate
implementation should be used instead. While it works fine, the approach
isn't very straight forward, over that we have an extra check in the
routine.
Rearrange code and update the cpufreq driver's get() callback pointer
directly for the hisilicon case. This gets the extra variable is removed
and the extra check isn't required anymore as well.
Tested-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
Commit 0c868627e617e43a295d8 (cpufreq: dt: Allow platform specific
intermediate callbacks) added two function pointers to the
struct cpufreq_dt_platform_data. However, armada37xx_cpufreq_driver_init()
has this struct (pdata) located on the stack and uses only "suspend"
and "resume" fields. So these newly added "get_intermediate" and
"target_intermediate" pointers are uninitialized and contain arbitrary
non-null values, causing all kinds of trouble.
For instance, here is an oops on espressobin after an attempt to change
the cpefreq governor:
[ 29.174554] Unable to handle kernel execute from non-executable memory at virtual address ffff00003f87bdc0
...
[ 29.269373] pc : 0xffff00003f87bdc0
[ 29.272957] lr : __cpufreq_driver_target+0x138/0x580
...
Fixed by zeroing out pdata before use.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.7+
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
On suspend we send AVS_CMD_S2_ENTER and on resume AVS_CMD_S2_EXIT.
These are best effort calls, so we don't check the return code or take
any action if either of the calls fails.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
In case the interrupt towards the host is never raised, yet the AVS
firmware responds correctly within the alloted time, allow supporting a
polling mode.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
We are changing how parameters are passed to __issue_avs_command(), so we
can pass input *and* output arguments with the same command, rather than
just one or the other.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
Disable fast switch when the opp-tables required for scaling DDR/L3
are populated.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
Add support to parse optional OPP table attached to the cpu node when
the OPP bandwidth values are populated. This allows for scaling of
DDR/L3 bandwidth levels with frequency change.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
|
|
Although there are processors supporting hardware-managed P-states
(HWP) without the energy-performance preference (EPP) feature, they
are not expected to be run with HWP enabled (the BIOS should disable
HWP on those systems). Missing EPP support generally indicates an
incomplete HWP implementation and so it is better to avoid using
HWP on those systems in production.
However, intel_pstate currently enables HWP on such systems, which
is questionable, so prevent it from doing that by making it check
EPP support before enabling HWP and avoid enabling it if EPP is not
supported by the processor at hand.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The kerneldoc description of the aperf_mperf_shift field in
struct global_params is unclear and there is a typo in it, so
simplify it and clean it up.
Reported-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
|
|
The sparse tool complains as follows:
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:88:1: warning:
symbol 'pstate_revmap' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:383:18: warning:
symbol 'cpufreq_freq_attr_cpuinfo_nominal_freq' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:669:6: warning:
symbol 'gpstate_timer_handler' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:902:6: warning:
symbol 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn' was not declared. Should it be static?
Those symbols are not used outside of this file, so mark
them static.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
ot used when MODULE is not defined.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c:147:32: warning: ‘amd_freq_sensitivity_ids’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
147 | static const struct x86_cpu_id amd_freq_sensitivity_ids[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
get_aperf_mperf_shift()
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:293: warning: Function parameter or member 'get_aperf_mperf_shift' not described in 'pstate_funcs'
Suggested-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Remove line break ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Not used when MODULE is not defined.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c:619:36: warning: ‘processor_device_ids’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
619 | static const struct acpi_device_id processor_device_ids[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
if we fail to use a variable, even a dummy ones, then the compiler
complains that it is set but not used. We know this is fine, so we
set them as __always_unused here to let the compiler know.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: In function ‘pending_bit_stuck’:
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:89:10: warning: variable ‘hi’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
89 | u32 lo, hi;
| ^~
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: In function ‘core_voltage_pre_transition’:
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:285:14: warning: variable ‘lo’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
285 | u32 maxvid, lo, rvomult = 1;
| ^~
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Not used when MODULE is not defined.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:1004:36: warning: ‘processor_device_ids’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
997 | static const struct x86_cpu_id acpi_cpufreq_ids[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:997:32: warning: ‘acpi_cpufreq_ids’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
619 | static const struct acpi_device_id processor_device_ids[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
If we fail to use a variable, even a 'dummy' one, then the compiler
complains that it is set but not used. We know this is fine, so we
set it as __always_unused to let the compiler know.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: In function ‘cpu_freq_read_intel’:
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:247:11: warning: variable ‘dummy’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: In function ‘cpu_freq_read_amd’:
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:265:11: warning: variable ‘dummy’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Repair problems with formatting and missing attributes/parameters, and
demote header comments which do not meet the required standards
applicable to kerneldoc.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:84: warning: Function parameter or member 'last_lpstate_idx' not described in 'global_pstate_info'
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:84: warning: Function parameter or member 'last_gpstate_idx' not described in 'global_pstate_info'
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:84: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'global_pstate_info'
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:182: warning: Function parameter or member 'i' not described in 'idx_to_pstate'
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:201: warning: Function parameter or member 'pstate' not described in 'pstate_to_idx'
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:670: warning: Function parameter or member 't' not described in 'gpstate_timer_handler'
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:670: warning: Excess function parameter 'data' description in 'gpstate_timer_handler'
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
If function callers and providers do not share the same prototypes the
compiler complains of missing prototypes. Fix this by including the
correct platforms header file.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:109:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘check_astate’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
109 | int check_astate(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c:114:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘restore_astate’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
114 | void restore_astate(int cpu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggested-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
comment block
There is no need for this to be denoted as kerneldoc.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'attr_set' not described in 'store_sampling_rate'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'store_sampling_rate'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'count' not described in 'store_sampling_rate'
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Also provide missing function parameter description for 'cpu' and 'policy'.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:60: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct cpufreq_driver *cpufreq_driver; '
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:90: warning: Function parameter or member 'cpufreq_policy_notifier_list' not described in 'BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:312: warning: Function parameter or member 'val' not described in 'adjust_jiffies'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:312: warning: Function parameter or member 'ci' not described in 'adjust_jiffies'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:538: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:686: warning: Function parameter or member 'file_name' not described in 'show_one'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:686: warning: Function parameter or member 'object' not described in 'show_one'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:731: warning: Function parameter or member 'file_name' not described in 'store_one'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:731: warning: Function parameter or member 'object' not described in 'store_one'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:741: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'show_cpuinfo_cur_freq'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:741: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'show_cpuinfo_cur_freq'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:754: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'show_scaling_governor'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:754: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'show_scaling_governor'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:770: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'store_scaling_governor'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:770: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'store_scaling_governor'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:770: warning: Function parameter or member 'count' not described in 'store_scaling_governor'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:806: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'show_scaling_driver'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:806: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'show_scaling_driver'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:815: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'show_scaling_available_governors'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:815: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'show_scaling_available_governors'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:859: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'show_related_cpus'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:859: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'show_related_cpus'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:867: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'show_affected_cpus'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:867: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'show_affected_cpus'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:901: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'show_bios_limit'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:901: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'show_bios_limit'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1625: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'cpufreq_remove_dev'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1625: warning: Function parameter or member 'sif' not described in 'cpufreq_remove_dev'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2380: warning: Function parameter or member 'cpu' not described in 'cpufreq_get_policy'
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:2771: warning: Function parameter or member 'driver' not described in 'cpufreq_unregister_driver'
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
blocks
No attempt has been made to document any of the demoted functions here.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'show_available_freqs'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'show_available_freqs'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:229: warning: Function parameter or member 'show_boost' not described in 'show_available_freqs'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:269: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'scaling_available_frequencies_show'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:269: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'scaling_available_frequencies_show'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:281: warning: Function parameter or member 'policy' not described in 'scaling_boost_frequencies_show'
drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c:281: warning: Function parameter or member 'buf' not described in 'scaling_boost_frequencies_show'
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
If intel_pstate starts in the passive mode by default (that happens
when the processor in the system doesn't support HWP), passing
intel_pstate=active in the kernel command line doesn't work, so
fix that.
Fixes: 33aa46f252c7 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use passive mode by default without HWP")
Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
|
|
Rationale:
Reduces attack surface on kernel devs opening the links for MITM
as HTTPS traffic is much harder to manipulate.
Deterministic algorithm:
For each file:
If not .svg:
For each line:
If doesn't contain `\bxmlns\b`:
For each link, `\bhttp://[^# \t\r\n]*(?:\w|/)`:
If neither `\bgnu\.org/license`, nor `\bmozilla\.org/MPL\b`:
If both the HTTP and HTTPS versions
return 200 OK and serve the same content:
Replace HTTP with HTTPS.
Signed-off-by: Alexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Fix warning for:
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:731 store_energy_performance_preference()
error: uninitialized symbol 'epp'.
This warning is for a case, when energy_performance_preference attribute
matches pre defined strings. In this case the value of raw epp will not
be used to set EPP bits in MSR_HWP_REQUEST. So initializing with any
value is fine.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The default cpufreq governor is chosen with the help of a "choice"
option in the Kconfig which will always end up selecting one of
the governors and so the weakly defined definition of
cpufreq_default_governor() will never get called.
Moreover, this makes us skip the checking of the return value of
that routine as it will always be non NULL.
If the Kconfig option changes in future, then we will start getting
a link error instead (and it won't go unnoticed as in the case of the
weak definition).
Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Currently, the only way to specify the default CPUfreq governor is
via Kconfig options, which suits users who can build the kernel
themselves perfectly.
However, for those who use a distro-like kernel (such as Android,
with the Generic Kernel Image project), the only way to use a
non-default governor is to boot to userspace, and to then switch
using the sysfs interface. Being able to specify the default governor
on the command line, like is the case for cpuidle, would allow those
users to specify their governor of choice earlier on, and to simplify
the userspace boot procedure slighlty.
To support this use-case, add a kernel command line parameter
allowing the default governor for CPUfreq to be specified, which
takes precedence over the built-in default.
This implementation has one notable limitation: the default governor
must be registered before the driver. This is solved for builtin
governors and drivers using appropriate *_initcall() functions. And
in the modular case, this must be reflected as a constraint on the
module loading order.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
[ Viresh: Converted 'default_governor' to a string and parsing it only
at initcall level, and several updates to
cpufreq_init_policy(). ]
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Currently, most CPUFreq governors are registered at the core_initcall
time when the given governor is the default one, and the module_init
time otherwise.
In preparation for letting users specify the default governor on the
kernel command line, change all of them to be registered at the
core_initcall unconditionally, as it is already the case for the
schedutil and performance governors. This will allow us to assume
that builtin governors have been registered before the built-in
CPUFreq drivers probe.
And since all governors have similar init/exit patterns now, introduce
two new macros, cpufreq_governor_{init,exit}(), to factorize the code.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The locking around governors handling isn't adequate currently.
The list of governors should never be traversed without the locking
in place. Also governor modules must not be removed while the code
in them is still in use.
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Currently using attribute "energy_performance_preference", user space can
write one of the four per-defined preference string. These preference
strings gets mapped to a hard-coded Energy-Performance Preference (EPP) or
Energy-Performance Bias (EPB) knob.
These four values are supposed to cover broad spectrum of use cases, but
are not uniformly distributed in the range. There are number of cases,
where this is not enough. For example:
Suppose user wants more performance when connected to AC. Instead of using
default "balance performance", the "performance" setting can be used. This
changes EPP value from 0x80 to 0x00. But setting EPP to 0, results in
electrical and thermal issues on some platforms. This results in
aggressive throttling, which causes a drop in performance. But some value
between 0x80 and 0x00 results in better performance. But that value can't
be fixed as the power curve is not linear. In some cases just changing EPP
from 0x80 to 0x75 is enough to get significant performance gain.
Similarly on battery the default "balance_performance" mode can be
aggressive in power consumption. But picking up the next choice
"balance power" results in too much loss of performance, which results in
bad user experience in use cases like "Google Hangout". It was observed
that some value between these two EPP is optimal.
This change allows fine grain EPP tuning for platform like Chromebook or
for users who wants to fine tune power and performance.
Here based on the product and use cases, different EPP values can be set.
This change is similar to the change done for:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/power/energy_perf_bias
where user has choice to write a predefined string or raw value.
The change itself is trivial. When user preference doesn't match
predefined string preferences and value is an unsigned integer and in
range, use that value for EPP. When the EPP feature is not present
writing raw value is not supported.
Suggested-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
By default intel_pstate the driver disables energy efficiency by setting
MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL bit 19 for Kaby Lake desktop CPU model in HWP mode.
This CPU model is also shared by Coffee Lake desktop CPUs. This allows
these systems to reach maximum possible frequency. But this adds power
penalty, which some customers don't want. They want some way to enable/
disable dynamically.
So, add an additional attribute "energy_efficiency" under
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/ for these CPU models. This allows
to read and write bit 19 ("Disable Energy Efficiency Optimization") in
the MSR IA32_POWER_CTL.
This attribute is present in both HWP and non-HWP mode as this has an
effect in both modes. Refer to Intel Software Developer's manual for
details.
The scope of this bit is package wide. Also these systems are single
package systems. So read/write MSR on the current CPU is enough.
The energy efficiency (EE) bit setting needs to be preserved during
suspend/resume and CPU offline/online operation. To do this:
- Restoring the EE setting from the cpufreq resume() callback, if there
is change from the system default.
- By default, don't disable EE from cpufreq init() callback for matching
CPU models. Since the scope is package wide and is a single package
system, move the disable EE calls from init() callback to
intel_pstate_init() function, which is called only once.
Suggested-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The unicore32 port is removed from the kernel.
There is no point to keep stale cpufreq driver for this architecture.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
|
|
Currently the fast_switch_possible flag is set unconditionally to true.
Based on this, schedutil does not create a thread for frequency
switching and would always use the fast switch path.
However, if the platform does not support SCMI fast channel, we use
polling mode for SCMI message transfer. This may be possible only if
there is dedicated channel for DVFS and all operations are in polling
mode.
Update this by retrieving the fast_switch capability based on the
presence of fast channels in SCMI platform firmware.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200617094332.8391-2-nicola.mazzucato@arm.com
Suggested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
The Energy Model framework supports not only CPU devices. Drop the CPU
specific interface with cpumask and add struct device. Add also a return
value, user might use it. This new interface provides easy way to create
a simple Energy Model, which then might be used by e.g. thermal subsystem.
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The Energy Model framework is going to support devices other that CPUs. In
order to make this happen change the callback function and add pointer to
a device as an argument.
Update the related users to use new function and new callback from the
Energy Model.
Acked-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Add one more bit for OOB (Out Of Band) enabling of P-states.
If OOB handling of P-states is enabled, intel_pstate shouldn't load.
Currently, only "BIT(8) == 1" of the MSR MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT is
considered as OOB, but "BIT(18) == 1" needs to be taken into
consideration as OOB condition too.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Add an empty code line, edit subject and changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Add SC7180 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blacklist since the actual scaling is
handled by the 'qcom-cpufreq-hw' driver.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
Add SDM845 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blacklist since the actual scaling is
handled by the 'qcom-cpufreq-hw' driver.
Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
|
|
Since commit 84af7a6194e4 ("checkpatch: kconfig: prefer 'help' over
'---help---'"), the number of '---help---' has been gradually
decreasing, but there are still more than 2400 instances.
This commit finishes the conversion. While I touched the lines,
I also fixed the indentation.
There are a variety of indentation styles found.
a) 4 spaces + '---help---'
b) 7 spaces + '---help---'
c) 8 spaces + '---help---'
d) 1 space + 1 tab + '---help---'
e) 1 tab + '---help---' (correct indentation)
f) 1 tab + 1 space + '---help---'
g) 1 tab + 2 spaces + '---help---'
In order to convert all of them to 1 tab + 'help', I ran the
following commend:
$ find . -name 'Kconfig*' | xargs sed -i 's/^[[:space:]]*---help---/\thelp/'
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
Pull more power management updates from Rafael Wysocki:
"These are operating performance points (OPP) framework updates mostly,
including support for interconnect bandwidth in the OPP core, plus a
few cpufreq changes, including boost support in the CPPC cpufreq
driver, an ACPI device power management fix and a hibernation code
cleanup.
Specifics:
- Add support for interconnect bandwidth to the OPP core (Georgi
Djakov, Saravana Kannan, Sibi Sankar, Viresh Kumar).
- Add support for regulator enable/disable to the OPP core (Kamil
Konieczny).
- Add boost support to the CPPC cpufreq driver (Xiongfeng Wang).
- Make the tegra186 cpufreq driver set the
CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flag (Mian Yousaf Kaukab).
- Prevent the ACPI power management from using power resources with
devices where the list of power resources for power state D0 (full
power) is missing (Rafael Wysocki).
- Annotate a hibernation-related function with __init (Christophe
JAILLET)"
* tag 'pm-5.8-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
ACPI: PM: Avoid using power resources if there are none for D0
cpufreq: CPPC: add SW BOOST support
cpufreq: change '.set_boost' to act on one policy
PM: hibernate: Add __init annotation to swsusp_header_init()
opp: Don't parse icc paths unnecessarily
opp: Remove bandwidth votes when target_freq is zero
opp: core: add regulators enable and disable
opp: Reorder the code for !target_freq case
opp: Expose bandwidth information via debugfs
cpufreq: dt: Add support for interconnect bandwidth scaling
opp: Update the bandwidth on OPP frequency changes
opp: Add sanity checks in _read_opp_key()
opp: Add support for parsing interconnect bandwidth
cpufreq: tegra186: add CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flag
OPP: Add helpers for reading the binding properties
dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-peak-kBps and opp-avg-kBps bindings
|
|
* pm-cpufreq:
cpufreq: CPPC: add SW BOOST support
cpufreq: change '.set_boost' to act on one policy
cpufreq: tegra186: add CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flag
* pm-acpi:
ACPI: PM: Avoid using power resources if there are none for D0
|
|
* pm-opp:
opp: Don't parse icc paths unnecessarily
opp: Remove bandwidth votes when target_freq is zero
opp: core: add regulators enable and disable
opp: Reorder the code for !target_freq case
opp: Expose bandwidth information via debugfs
cpufreq: dt: Add support for interconnect bandwidth scaling
opp: Update the bandwidth on OPP frequency changes
opp: Add sanity checks in _read_opp_key()
opp: Add support for parsing interconnect bandwidth
interconnect: Remove unused module exit code from core
interconnect: Disallow interconnect core to be built as a module
interconnect: Add of_icc_get_by_index() helper function
OPP: Add helpers for reading the binding properties
dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-peak-kBps and opp-avg-kBps bindings
|
|
To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we need to get the max frequency of
boost mode and non-boost mode. ACPI spec 6.2 section 8.4.7.1 describes
the following two CPC registers.
"Highest performance is the absolute maximum performance an individual
processor may reach, assuming ideal conditions. This performance level
may not be sustainable for long durations, and may only be achievable if
other platform components are in a specific state; for example, it may
require other processors be in an idle state.
Nominal Performance is the maximum sustained performance level of the
processor, assuming ideal operating conditions. In absence of an
external constraint (power, thermal, etc.) this is the performance level
the platform is expected to be able to maintain continuously. All
processors are expected to be able to sustain their nominal performance
state simultaneously."
To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we can use Highest Performance as the
max performance in boost mode and Nominal Performance as the max
performance in non-boost mode. If the Highest Performance is greater
than the Nominal Performance, we assume SW BOOST is supported.
The current CPPC driver does not support SW BOOST and use 'Highest
Performance' as the max performance the CPU can achieve. 'Nominal
Performance' is used to convert 'performance' to 'frequency'. That
means, if firmware enable boost and provide a value for Highest
Performance which is greater than Nominal Performance, boost feature is
enabled by default.
Because SW BOOST is disabled by default, so, after this patch, boost
feature is disabled by default even if boost is enabled by firmware.
Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
