summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-02-28locking/lockdep: Update two outdated commentsBart Van Assche
synchronize_sched() has been removed recently. Update the comments that refer to synchronize_sched(). Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Fixes: 51959d85f32d ("lockdep: Replace synchronize_sched() with synchronize_rcu()") # v5.0-rc1 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-11-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-28locking/lockdep: Make it easy to detect whether or not inside a selftestBart Van Assche
The patch that frees unused lock classes will modify the behavior of lockdep_free_key_range() and lockdep_reset_lock() depending on whether or not these functions are called from the context of the lockdep selftests. Hence make it easy to detect whether or not lockdep code is called from the context of a lockdep selftest. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-10-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-28locking/lockdep: Split lockdep_free_key_range() and lockdep_reset_lock()Bart Van Assche
This patch does not change the behavior of these functions but makes the patch that frees unused lock classes easier to read. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-9-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-28locking/lockdep: Initialize the locks_before and locks_after lists earlierBart Van Assche
This patch does not change any functionality. A later patch will reuse lock classes that have been freed. In combination with that patch this patch wil have the effect of initializing lock class order lists once instead of every time a lock class structure is reinitialized. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-8-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-28locking/lockdep: Make zap_class() remove all matching lock order entriesBart Van Assche
Make sure that all lock order entries that refer to a class are removed from the list_entries[] array when a kernel module is unloaded. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-7-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-28locking/lockdep: Avoid that add_chain_cache() adds an invalid chain to the cacheBart Van Assche
Make sure that add_chain_cache() returns 0 and does not modify the chain hash if nr_chain_hlocks == MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS before this function is called. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-5-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-28locking/lockdep: Fix reported required memory size (2/2)Bart Van Assche
Lock chains are only tracked with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y. Do not report the memory required for the lock chain array if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=n. See also commit: ca58abcb4a6d ("lockdep: sanitise CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") Include the size of the chain_hlocks[] array. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-4-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-28locking/lockdep: Fix reported required memory size (1/2)Bart Van Assche
Change the sizeof(array element time) * (array size) expressions into sizeof(array). This fixes the size computations of the classhash_table[] and chainhash_table[] arrays. The reason is that commit: a63f38cc4ccf ("locking/lockdep: Convert hash tables to hlists") changed the type of the elements of that array from 'struct list_head' into 'struct hlist_head'. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-3-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-28locking/lockdep: Fix two 32-bit compiler warningsBart Van Assche
Use %zu to format size_t instead of %lu to avoid that the compiler complains about a mismatch between format specifier and argument on 32-bit systems. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190214230058.196511-2-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-13kprobes: Prohibit probing on lockdep functionsMasami Hiramatsu
Some lockdep functions can be involved in breakpoint handling and probing on those functions can cause a breakpoint recursion. Prohibit probing on those functions by blacklist. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/154998810578.31052.1680977921449292812.stgit@devbox Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-02-04locking/lockdep: Add debug_locks check in __lock_downgrade()Waiman Long
Tetsuo Handa had reported he saw an incorrect "downgrading a read lock" warning right after a previous lockdep warning. It is likely that the previous warning turned off lock debugging causing the lockdep to have inconsistency states leading to the lock downgrade warning. Fix that by add a check for debug_locks at the beginning of __lock_downgrade(). Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Reported-by: syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547093005-26085-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-01-21locking/lockdep: Provide enum lock_usage_bit mask namesFrederic Weisbecker
It makes the code more self-explanatory and tells throughout the code what magic number refers to: - state (Hardirq/Softirq) - direction (used in or enabled above state) - read or write We can even remove some comments that were compensating for the lack of those constant names. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1545973321-24422-3-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-01-21locking/lockdep: Simplify mark_held_locks()Frederic Weisbecker
The enum mark_type appears a bit artificial here. We can directly pass the base enum lock_usage_bit value to mark_held_locks(). All we need then is to add the read index for each lock if necessary. It makes the code clearer. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1545973321-24422-2-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-01-21locking/lockdep: Add debug_locks check in __lock_downgrade()Waiman Long
Tetsuo Handa had reported he saw an incorrect "downgrading a read lock" warning right after a previous lockdep warning. It is likely that the previous warning turned off lock debugging causing the lockdep to have inconsistency states leading to the lock downgrade warning. Fix that by add a check for debug_locks at the beginning of __lock_downgrade(). Debugged-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Reported-by: syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547093005-26085-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-26Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main change in this cycle are initial preparatory bits of dynamic lockdep keys support from Bart Van Assche. There are also misc changes, a comment cleanup and a data structure cleanup" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: sched/fair: Clean up comment in nohz_idle_balance() locking/lockdep: Stop using RCU primitives to access 'all_lock_classes' locking/lockdep: Make concurrent lockdep_reset_lock() calls safe locking/lockdep: Remove a superfluous INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement locking/lockdep: Introduce lock_class_cache_is_registered() locking/lockdep: Inline __lockdep_init_map() locking/lockdep: Declare local symbols static tools/lib/lockdep/tests: Test the lockdep_reset_lock() implementation tools/lib/lockdep: Add dummy print_irqtrace_events() implementation tools/lib/lockdep: Rename "trywlock" into "trywrlock" tools/lib/lockdep/tests: Run lockdep tests a second time under Valgrind tools/lib/lockdep/tests: Improve testing accuracy tools/lib/lockdep/tests: Fix shellcheck warnings tools/lib/lockdep/tests: Display compiler warning and error messages locking/lockdep: Remove ::version from lock_class structure
2018-12-11locking/lockdep: Stop using RCU primitives to access 'all_lock_classes'Bart Van Assche
Due to the previous patch all code that accesses the 'all_lock_classes' list holds the graph lock. Hence use regular list primitives instead of their RCU variants to access this list. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181207011148.251812-14-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11locking/lockdep: Make concurrent lockdep_reset_lock() calls safeBart Van Assche
Since zap_class() removes items from the all_lock_classes list and the classhash_table, protect all zap_class() calls against concurrent data structure modifications with the graph lock. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181207011148.251812-13-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11locking/lockdep: Remove a superfluous INIT_LIST_HEAD() statementBart Van Assche
Initializing a list entry just before it is passed to list_add_tail_rcu() is not necessary because list_add_tail_rcu() overwrites the next and prev pointers anyway. Hence remove the INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181207011148.251812-12-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11locking/lockdep: Introduce lock_class_cache_is_registered()Bart Van Assche
This patch does not change any functionality but makes the lockdep_reset_lock() function easier to read. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181207011148.251812-11-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11locking/lockdep: Inline __lockdep_init_map()Bart Van Assche
Since the function __lockdep_init_map() only has one caller, inline it into its caller. This patch does not change any functionality. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181207011148.251812-10-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-12-11locking/lockdep: Declare local symbols staticBart Van Assche
This patch avoids that sparse complains about a missing declaration for the lock_classes array when building with CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=n. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181207011148.251812-9-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-11-27lockdep: Replace synchronize_sched() with synchronize_rcu()Paul E. McKenney
Now that synchronize_rcu() waits for preempt-disable regions of code as well as RCU read-side critical sections, synchronize_sched() can be replaced by synchronize_rcu(). This commit therefore makes this change. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2018-10-19locking/lockdep: Fix debug_locks off performance problemWaiman Long
It was found that when debug_locks was turned off because of a problem found by the lockdep code, the system performance could drop quite significantly when the lock_stat code was also configured into the kernel. For instance, parallel kernel build time on a 4-socket x86-64 server nearly doubled. Further analysis into the cause of the slowdown traced back to the frequent call to debug_locks_off() from the __lock_acquired() function probably due to some inconsistent lockdep states with debug_locks off. The debug_locks_off() function did an unconditional atomic xchg to write a 0 value into debug_locks which had already been set to 0. This led to severe cacheline contention in the cacheline that held debug_locks. As debug_locks is being referenced in quite a few different places in the kernel, this greatly slow down the system performance. To prevent that trashing of debug_locks cacheline, lock_acquired() and lock_contended() now checks the state of debug_locks before proceeding. The debug_locks_off() function is also modified to check debug_locks before calling __debug_locks_off(). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1539913518-15598-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-10-16Merge branch 'x86/build' into locking/core, to pick up dependent patches and ↵Ingo Molnar
unify jump-label work Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-10-16locking/lockdep: Remove duplicated 'lock_class_ops' percpu arrayWaiman Long
Remove the duplicated 'lock_class_ops' percpu array that is not used anywhere. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Fixes: 8ca2b56cd7da ("locking/lockdep: Make class->ops a percpu counter and move it under CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1539380547-16726-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-10-09locking/lockdep: Make class->ops a percpu counter and move it under ↵Waiman Long
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y A sizable portion of the CPU cycles spent on the __lock_acquire() is used up by the atomic increment of the class->ops stat counter. By taking it out from the lock_class structure and changing it to a per-cpu per-lock-class counter, we can reduce the amount of cacheline contention on the class structure when multiple CPUs are trying to acquire locks of the same class simultaneously. To limit the increase in memory consumption because of the percpu nature of that counter, it is now put back under the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP config option. So the memory consumption increase will only occur if CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP is defined. The lock_class structure, however, is reduced in size by 16 bytes on 64-bit archs after ops removal and a minor restructuring of the fields. This patch also fixes a bug in the increment code as the counter is of the 'unsigned long' type, but atomic_inc() was used to increment it. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d66681f3-8781-9793-1dcf-2436a284550b@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-10-03locking/lockdep: Add a faster path in __lock_release()Waiman Long
When __lock_release() is called, the most likely unlock scenario is on the innermost lock in the chain. In this case, we can skip some of the checks and provide a faster path to completion. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1538511560-10090-4-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-10-03locking/lockdep: Eliminate redundant IRQs check in __lock_acquire()Waiman Long
The static __lock_acquire() function has only two callers: 1) lock_acquire() 2) reacquire_held_locks() In lock_acquire(), raw_local_irq_save() is called beforehand. So IRQs must have been disabled. So the check: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()) is kind of redundant in this case. So move the above check to reacquire_held_locks() to eliminate redundant code in the lock_acquire() path. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1538511560-10090-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-10-03locking/lockdep: Remove add_chain_cache_classes()Waiman Long
The inline function add_chain_cache_classes() is defined, but has no caller. Just remove it. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1538511560-10090-2-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-09-10locking/lockdep: Delete unnecessary #includeBen Hutchings
Commit: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") added the inclusion of <trace/events/preemptirq.h>. liblockdep doesn't have a stub version of that header so now fails to build. However, commit: bff1b208a5d1 ("tracing: Partial revert of "tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage"") removed the use of functions declared in that header. So delete the #include. Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Fixes: bff1b208a5d1 ("tracing: Partial revert of "tracing: Centralize ...") Fixes: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints ...") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180828203315.GD18030@decadent.org.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-08-10tracing: Partial revert of "tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and ↵Steven Rostedt (VMware)
unify their usage" Joel Fernandes created a nice patch that cleaned up the duplicate hooks used by lockdep and irqsoff latency tracer. It made both use tracepoints. But it caused lockdep to trigger several false positives. We have not figured out why yet, but removing lockdep from using the trace event hooks and just call its helper functions directly (like it use to), makes the problem go away. This is a partial revert of the clean up patch c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") that adds direct calls for lockdep, but also keeps most of the clean up done to get rid of the horrible preprocessor if statements. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180806155058.5ee875f4@gandalf.local.home Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Fixes: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-07-31tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usageJoel Fernandes (Google)
This patch detaches the preemptirq tracepoints from the tracers and keeps it separate. Advantages: * Lockdep and irqsoff event can now run in parallel since they no longer have their own calls. * This unifies the usecase of adding hooks to an irqsoff and irqson event, and a preemptoff and preempton event. 3 users of the events exist: - Lockdep - irqsoff and preemptoff tracers - irqs and preempt trace events The unification cleans up several ifdefs and makes the code in preempt tracer and irqsoff tracers simpler. It gets rid of all the horrific ifdeferry around PROVE_LOCKING and makes configuration of the different users of the tracepoints more easy and understandable. It also gets rid of the time_* function calls from the lockdep hooks used to call into the preemptirq tracer which is not needed anymore. The negative delta in lines of code in this patch is quite large too. In the patch we introduce a new CONFIG option PREEMPTIRQ_TRACEPOINTS as a single point for registering probes onto the tracepoints. With this, the web of config options for preempt/irq toggle tracepoints and its users becomes: PREEMPT_TRACER PREEMPTIRQ_EVENTS IRQSOFF_TRACER PROVE_LOCKING | | \ | | \ (selects) / \ \ (selects) / TRACE_PREEMPT_TOGGLE ----> TRACE_IRQFLAGS \ / \ (depends on) / PREEMPTIRQ_TRACEPOINTS Other than the performance tests mentioned in the previous patch, I also ran the locking API test suite. I verified that all tests cases are passing. I also injected issues by not registering lockdep probes onto the tracepoints and I see failures to confirm that the probes are indeed working. This series + lockdep probes not registered (just to inject errors): [ 0.000000] hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | With this series + lockdep probes registered, all locking tests pass: [ 0.000000] hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180730222423.196630-4-joel@joelfernandes.org Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-07-30lockdep: Use this_cpu_ptr instead of get_cpu_var statsJoel Fernandes (Google)
get_cpu_var disables preemption which has the potential to call into the preemption disable trace points causing some complications. There's also no need to disable preemption in uses of get_lock_stats anyway since preempt is already disabled. So lets simplify the code. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180730222423.196630-2-joel@joelfernandes.org Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2018-06-21locking/lockdep: Do not record IRQ state within lockdep codeSteven Rostedt (VMware)
While debugging where things were going wrong with mapping enabling/disabling interrupts with the lockdep state and actual real enabling and disabling interrupts, I had to silent the IRQ disabling/enabling in debug_check_no_locks_freed() because it was always showing up as it was called before the splat was. Use raw_local_irq_save/restore() for not only debug_check_no_locks_freed() but for all internal lockdep functions, as they hide useful information about where interrupts were used incorrectly last. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/20180404140630.3f4f4c7a@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-05-14locking/lockdep: Move sanity check to inside lockdep_print_held_locks()Tetsuo Handa
Calling lockdep_print_held_locks() on a running thread is considered unsafe. Since all callers should follow that rule and the sanity check is not heavy, this patch moves the sanity check to inside lockdep_print_held_locks(). As a side effect of this patch, the number of locks held by running threads will be printed as well. This change will be preferable when we want to know which threads might be relevant to a problem but are unable to print any clues because that thread is running. Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1523011279-8206-2-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-05-14locking/lockdep: Use for_each_process_thread() for debug_show_all_locks()Tetsuo Handa
debug_show_all_locks() tries to grab the tasklist_lock for two seconds, but calling while_each_thread() without tasklist_lock held is not safe. See the following commit for more information: 4449a51a7c281602 ("vm_is_stack: use for_each_thread() rather then buggy while_each_thread()") Change debug_show_all_locks() from "do_each_thread()/while_each_thread() with possibility of missing tasklist_lock" to "for_each_process_thread() with RCU", and add a call to touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs() like show_state_filter() does. Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1523011279-8206-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-03-29lockdep: Make the lock debug output more usefulTetsuo Handa
The lock debug output in print_lock() has a few shortcomings: - It prints the hlock->acquire_ip field in %px and %pS format. That's redundant information. - It lacks information about the lock object itself. The lock class is not helpful to identify a particular instance of a lock. Change the output so it prints: - hlock->instance to allow identification of a particular lock instance. - only the %pS format of hlock->ip_acquire which is sufficient to decode the actual code line with faddr2line. The resulting output is: 3 locks held by a.out/31106: #0: 00000000b0f753ba (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: copy_process.part.41+0x10d5/0x1fe0 #1: 00000000ef64d539 (&mm->mmap_sem/1){+.+.}, at: copy_process.part.41+0x10fe/0x1fe0 #2: 00000000b41a282e (&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem){++++}, at: copy_process.part.41+0x12f2/0x1fe0 [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/201803271941.GBE57310.tVSOJLQOFFOHFM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
2018-02-28locking/lockdep: Show unadorned pointersBorislav Petkov
Show unadorned pointers in lockdep reports - lockdep is a debugging facility and hashing pointers there doesn't make a whole lotta sense. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180226134926.23069-1-bp@alien8.de
2018-01-30Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes relate to making lock_is_held() et al (and external wrappers of them) work on const data types - this requires const propagation through the depths of lockdep. This removes a number of ugly type hacks the external helpers used" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: lockdep: Convert some users to const lockdep: Make lockdep checking constant lockdep: Assign lock keys on registration
2018-01-24locking/lockdep: Avoid triggering hardlockup from debug_show_all_locks()Tejun Heo
debug_show_all_locks() iterates all tasks and print held locks whole holding tasklist_lock. This can take a while on a slow console device and may end up triggering NMI hardlockup detector if someone else ends up waiting for tasklist_lock. Touch the NMI watchdog while printing the held locks to avoid spuriously triggering the hardlockup detector. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: kernel-team@fb.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180122220055.GB1771050@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-01-18lockdep: Make lockdep checking constantMatthew Wilcox
There are several places in the kernel which would like to pass a const pointer to lockdep_is_held(). Constify the entire path so nobody has to trick the compiler. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180117151414.23686-3-willy@infradead.org
2018-01-18lockdep: Assign lock keys on registrationMatthew Wilcox
Lockdep is assigning lock keys when a lock was looked up. This is unnecessary; if the lock has never been registered then it is known that it is not locked. It also complicates the calling convention. Switch to assigning the lock key in register_lock_class(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180117151414.23686-2-willy@infradead.org
2017-12-12locking/lockdep: Remove the cross-release locking checksIngo Molnar
This code (CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE=y and CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS=y), while it found a number of old bugs initially, was also causing too many false positives that caused people to disable lockdep - which is arguably a worse overall outcome. If we disable cross-release by default but keep the code upstream then in practice the most likely outcome is that we'll allow the situation to degrade gradually, by allowing entropy to introduce more and more false positives, until it overwhelms maintenance capacity. Another bad side effect was that people were trying to work around the false positives by uglifying/complicating unrelated code. There's a marked difference between annotating locking operations and uglifying good code just due to bad lock debugging code ... This gradual decrease in quality happened to a number of debugging facilities in the kernel, and lockdep is pretty complex already, so we cannot risk this outcome. Either cross-release checking can be done right with no false positives, or it should not be included in the upstream kernel. ( Note that it might make sense to maintain it out of tree and go through the false positives every now and then and see whether new bugs were introduced. ) Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-12-06locking/lockdep: Fix possible NULL derefPeter Zijlstra
We can't invalidate xhlocks when we've not yet allocated any. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f52be5708076 ("locking/lockdep: Untangle xhlock history save/restore from task independence") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-15kmemcheck: remove annotationsLevin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)
Patch series "kmemcheck: kill kmemcheck", v2. As discussed at LSF/MM, kill kmemcheck. KASan is a replacement that is able to work without the limitation of kmemcheck (single CPU, slow). KASan is already upstream. We are also not aware of any users of kmemcheck (or users who don't consider KASan as a suitable replacement). The only objection was that since KASAN wasn't supported by all GCC versions provided by distros at that time we should hold off for 2 years, and try again. Now that 2 years have passed, and all distros provide gcc that supports KASAN, kill kmemcheck again for the very same reasons. This patch (of 4): Remove kmemcheck annotations, and calls to kmemcheck from the kernel. [alexander.levin@verizon.com: correctly remove kmemcheck call from dma_map_sg_attrs] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171012192151.26531-1-alexander.levin@verizon.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171007030159.22241-2-alexander.levin@verizon.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tim Hansen <devtimhansen@gmail.com> Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-10-25locking/lockdep: Introduce CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE_FULLSTACK=yByungchul Park
Add a Kconfig knob that enables the lockdep "crossrelease_fullstack" boot parameter. Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: amir73il@gmail.com Cc: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: darrick.wong@oracle.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: hch@infradead.org Cc: idryomov@gmail.com Cc: johan@kernel.org Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508921765-15396-7-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-25locking/lockdep: Add a boot parameter allowing unwind in cross-release and ↵Byungchul Park
disable it by default Johan Hovold reported a heavy performance regression caused by lockdep cross-release: > Boot time (from "Linux version" to login prompt) had in fact doubled > since 4.13 where it took 17 seconds (with my current config) compared to > the 35 seconds I now see with 4.14-rc4. > > I quick bisect pointed to lockdep and specifically the following commit: > > 28a903f63ec0 ("locking/lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition > of a crosslock") > > which I've verified is the commit which doubled the boot time (compared > to 28a903f63ec0^) (added by lockdep crossrelease series [1]). Currently cross-release performs unwind on every acquisition, but that is very expensive. This patch makes unwind optional and disables it by default and only records acquire_ip. Full stack traces are sometimes required for full analysis, in which case a boot paramter, crossrelease_fullstack, can be specified. On my qemu Ubuntu machine (x86_64, 4 cores, 512M), the regression was fixed. We measure boot times with 'perf stat --null --repeat 10 $QEMU', where $QEMU launches a kernel with init=/bin/true: 1. No lockdep enabled: Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs): 2.756558155 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.09% ) 2. Lockdep enabled: Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs): 2.968710420 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.12% ) 3. Lockdep enabled + cross-release enabled: Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs): 3.153839636 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.31% ) 4. Lockdep enabled + cross-release enabled + this patch applied: Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs): 2.963669551 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.11% ) I.e. lockdep cross-release performance is now indistinguishable from vanilla lockdep. Bisected-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Analyzed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: amir73il@gmail.com Cc: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: darrick.wong@oracle.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: hch@infradead.org Cc: idryomov@gmail.com Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508921765-15396-5-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-10locking/lockdep: Fix stacktrace messPeter Zijlstra
There is some complication between check_prevs_add() and check_prev_add() wrt. saving stack traces. The problem is that we want to be frugal with saving stack traces, since it consumes static resources. We'll only know in check_prev_add() if we need the trace, but we can call into it multiple times. So we want to do on-demand and re-use. A further complication is that check_prev_add() can drop graph_lock and mess with our static resources. In any case, the current state; after commit: ce07a9415f26 ("locking/lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace") is that we'll assume the trace contains valid data once check_prev_add() returns '2'. However, as noted by Josh, this is false, check_prev_add() can return '2' before having saved a trace, this then result in the possibility of using uninitialized data. Testing, as reported by Wu, shows a NULL deref. So simplify. Since the graph_lock() thing is a debug path that hasn't really been used in a long while, take it out back and avoid the head-ache. Further initialize the stack_trace to a known 'empty' state; as long as nr_entries == 0, nothing should deref entries. We can then use the 'entries == NULL' test for a valid trace / on-demand saving. Analyzed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: ce07a9415f26 ("locking/lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-08-29locking/lockdep: Untangle xhlock history save/restore from task independencePeter Zijlstra
Where XHLOCK_{SOFT,HARD} are save/restore points in the xhlocks[] to ensure the temporal IRQ events don't interact with task state, the XHLOCK_PROC is a fundament different beast that just happens to share the interface. The purpose of XHLOCK_PROC is to annotate independent execution inside one task. For example workqueues, each work should appear to run in its own 'pristine' 'task'. Remove XHLOCK_PROC in favour of its own interface to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170829085939.ggmb6xiohw67micb@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-08-25locking/lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotationPeter Zijlstra
The new completion/crossrelease annotations interact unfavourable with the extant flush_work()/flush_workqueue() annotations. The problem is that when a single work class does: wait_for_completion(&C) and complete(&C) in different executions, we'll build dependencies like: lock_map_acquire(W) complete_acquire(C) and lock_map_acquire(W) complete_release(C) which results in the dependency chain: W->C->W, which lockdep thinks spells deadlock, even though there is no deadlock potential since works are ran concurrently. One possibility would be to change the work 'lock' to recursive-read, but that would mean hitting a lockdep limitation on recursive locks. Also, unconditinoally switching to recursive-read here would fail to detect the actual deadlock on single-threaded workqueues, which do have a problem with this. For now, forcefully disregard these locks for crossrelease. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: byungchul.park@lge.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: oleg@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>