diff options
author | Raphael Pinsonneault-Thibeault <rpthibeault@gmail.com> | 2025-08-18 14:19:34 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> | 2025-08-21 12:49:01 -0600 |
commit | 41ecad8b233bf480a1f39b76462dcb2c2d3cdfed (patch) | |
tree | d8d04c7fd57b7d289b02136addf5c282afa49582 | |
parent | 4cc7dce79725689d8dd229e13c857aeb97b1c7cf (diff) |
docs: fix trailing whitespace error and remove repeated words in propagate_umount.txt
in Documentation/filesystems/propagate_umount.txt:
line 289: remove whitespace on blank line
line 315: remove duplicate "that"
line 364: remove duplicate "in"
Signed-off-by: Raphael Pinsonneault-Thibeault <rpthibeault@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250818181934.55491-2-rpthibeault@gmail.com
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/propagate_umount.txt | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/propagate_umount.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/propagate_umount.txt index c90349e5b889..9a7eb96df300 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/propagate_umount.txt +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/propagate_umount.txt @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ Trim_one(m) strip the "seen by Trim_ancestors" mark from m remove m from the Candidates list return - + remove_this = false found = false for each n in children(m) @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ Trim_ancestors(m) } Terminating condition in the loop in Trim_ancestors() is correct, -since that that loop will never run into p belonging to U - p is always +since that loop will never run into p belonging to U - p is always an ancestor of argument of Trim_one() and since U is closed, the argument of Trim_one() would also have to belong to U. But Trim_one() is never called for elements of U. In other words, p belongs to S if and only @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ such removals. Proof: suppose S was non-shifting, x is a locked element of S, parent of x is not in S and S - {x} is not non-shifting. Then there is an element m in S - {x} and a subtree mounted strictly inside m, such that m contains -an element not in in S - {x}. Since S is non-shifting, everything in +an element not in S - {x}. Since S is non-shifting, everything in that subtree must belong to S. But that means that this subtree must contain x somewhere *and* that parent of x either belongs that subtree or is equal to m. Either way it must belong to S. Contradiction. |