diff options
| author | Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com> | 2024-11-18 21:29:33 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com> | 2024-11-18 21:29:33 +0100 |
| commit | f33e46a0c6bddd341d0989484a2546bba7ac4a3c (patch) | |
| tree | 4918985ab00890205c8d77d0553472e12e01cd55 /tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | |
| parent | 66ef47faa90d838cda131fe1f7776456cc3b59f2 (diff) | |
| parent | a025b0dbd83f85cf81ff447431cfd8b2d3cacb0a (diff) | |
Merge branch 'for-6.13/wacom' into for-linus
- Sanitization of BTN_TOOL_RUBBER handling (Jason Gerecke)
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h index 305c62817dd3..80bc0242e8dc 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ extern void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __weak __ksym; * I.e., it looks almost like high-level for each loop in other languages, * supports continue/break, and is verifiable by BPF verifier. * - * For iterating integers, the difference betwen bpf_for_each(num, i, N, M) + * For iterating integers, the difference between bpf_for_each(num, i, N, M) * and bpf_for(i, N, M) is in that bpf_for() provides additional proof to * verifier that i is in [N, M) range, and in bpf_for_each() case i is `int * *`, not just `int`. So for integers bpf_for() is more convenient. |