summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-06-05riscv: Add support for ZicbopAlexandre Ghiti
Zicbop introduces cache blocks prefetching instructions, add the necessary support for the kernel to use it in the coming commits. Co-developed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Tested-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250421142441.395849-3-alexghiti@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
2024-07-12riscv: Add Zawrs support for spinlocksChristoph Müllner
RISC-V code uses the generic ticket lock implementation, which calls the macros smp_cond_load_relaxed() and smp_cond_load_acquire(). Introduce a RISC-V specific implementation of smp_cond_load_relaxed() which applies WRS.NTO of the Zawrs extension in order to reduce power consumption while waiting and allows hypervisors to enable guests to trap while waiting. smp_cond_load_acquire() doesn't need a RISC-V specific implementation as the generic implementation is based on smp_cond_load_relaxed() and smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep() sufficiently provides the acquire semantics. This implementation is heavily based on Arm's approach which is the approach Andrea Parri also suggested. The Zawrs specification can be found here: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-zawrs/blob/main/zawrs.adoc Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu> Co-developed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240426100820.14762-11-ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-03-19riscv/barrier: Add missing space after ','Eric Chan
The past form of RISCV_FENCE would cause checkpatch.pl to issue error messages, the example is as follows: ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV) 26: FILE: arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h:27: +#define __smp_mb() RISCV_FENCE(rw,rw) ^ fix the remaining of RISCV_FENCE. Signed-off-by: Eric Chan <ericchancf@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240217131328.3669364-1-ericchancf@google.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-03-19riscv/barrier: Consolidate fence definitionsEric Chan
Disparate fence implementations are consolidated into fence.h. Also introduce RISCV_FENCE_ASM to make fence macro more reusable. Signed-off-by: Eric Chan <ericchancf@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240217131316.3668927-1-ericchancf@google.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-03-19riscv/barrier: Define __{mb,rmb,wmb}Eric Chan
Introduce __{mb,rmb,wmb}, and rely on the generic definitions for {mb,rmb,wmb}. Although KCSAN is not supported yet, the definitions can be made more consistent with generic instrumentation. Also add a space to make the changes pass check by checkpatch.pl. Without the space, the error message is as below: ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV) 26: FILE: arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h:23: +#define __mb() RISCV_FENCE(iorw,iorw) ^ Signed-off-by: Eric Chan <ericchancf@google.com> Reviewed-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240217131249.3668103-1-ericchancf@google.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-07-21riscv: introduce nops and __nops macros for NOP sequencesHeiko Stuebner
NOP sequences tend to get used for padding out alternative sections This change adds macros for generating these sequences as both inline asm blocks, but also as strings suitable for embedding in other asm blocks directly. It essentially mimics similar functionality from arm64 introduced by Wil Deacon in commit f99a250cb6a3 ("arm64: barriers: introduce nops and __nops macros for NOP sequences"). Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607143059.1054074-2-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2020-07-17RISC-V: Upgrade smp_mb__after_spinlock() to iorw,iorwPalmer Dabbelt
While digging through the recent mmiowb preemption issue it came up that we aren't actually preventing IO from crossing a scheduling boundary. While it's a bit ugly to overload smp_mb__after_spinlock() with this behavior, it's what PowerPC is doing so there's some precedent. Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
2019-06-19treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 234Thomas Gleixner
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as published by the free software foundation this program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program if not see http www gnu org licenses extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 503 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190602204653.811534538@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-04-02riscv/barrier: Define __smp_{store_release,load_acquire}Andrea Parri
Introduce __smp_{store_release,load_acquire}, and rely on the generic definitions for smp_{store_release,load_acquire}. This avoids the use of full ("rw,rw") fences on SMP. Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2018-02-26riscv/barrier: Define __smp_{mb,rmb,wmb}Andrea Parri
Introduce __smp_{mb,rmb,wmb}, and rely on the generic definitions for smp_{mb,rmb,wmb}. A first consequence is that smp_{mb,rmb,wmb} map to a compiler barrier on !SMP (while their definition remains unchanged on SMP). As a further consequence, smp_load_acquire and smp_store_release have "fence rw,rw" instead of "fence iorw,iorw". Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2017-12-11RISC-V: Resurrect smp_mb__after_spinlock()Palmer Dabbelt
I removed this last week because of an incorrect comment: smp_mb__after_spinlock() is actually still used, and is necessary on RISC-V. It's been resurrected, with a comment that describes what it actually does this time. Thanks to Andrea for finding the bug! Fixes: 3343eb6806f3 ("RISC-V: Remove smb_mb__{before,after}_spinlock()") CC: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2017-11-28RISC-V: Remove smb_mb__{before,after}_spinlock()Palmer Dabbelt
These are obselete. Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2017-11-28RISC-V: Remove __smp_bp__{before,after}_atomicPalmer Dabbelt
These duplicate the asm-generic definitions are therefor aren't useful. Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
2017-09-26RISC-V: Atomic and Locking CodePalmer Dabbelt
This contains all the code that directly interfaces with the RISC-V memory model. While this code corforms to the current RISC-V ISA specifications (user 2.2 and priv 1.10), the memory model is somewhat underspecified in those documents. There is a working group that hopes to produce a formal memory model by the end of the year, but my understanding is that the basic definitions we're relying on here won't change significantly. Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>