| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Recent net-next fails to initialize ports with:
realtek-smi switch: phy mode gmii is unsupported on port 0
realtek-smi switch lan5 (uninitialized): validation of gmii with
support 0000000,00000000,000062ef and advertisement
0000000,00000000,000062ef failed: -22
realtek-smi switch lan5 (uninitialized): failed to connect to PHY:
-EINVAL
realtek-smi switch lan5 (uninitialized): error -22 setting up PHY
for tree 1, switch 0, port 0
Current net branch(3dd7d40b43663f58d11ee7a3d3798813b26a48f1) is not
affected.
I also noticed the same issue before with older versions but using
a MDIO interface driver, not realtek-smi.
Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
A contact at Realtek has clarified what exactly the units of RGMII RX
delay are. The answer is that the unit of RX delay is "about 0.3 ns".
Take this into account when parsing rx-internal-delay-ps by
approximating the closest step value. Delays of more than 2.1 ns are
rejected.
This obviously contradicts the previous assumption in the driver that a
step value of 4 was "about 2 ns", but Realtek also points out that it is
easy to find more than one RX delay step value which makes RGMII work.
Fixes: 4af2950c50c8 ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: add rtl8365mb subdriver for RTL8365MB-VC")
Cc: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Acked-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Fixes: 4af2950c50c8 ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: add rtl8365mb subdriver for RTL8365MB-VC")
Signed-off-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This switch family can have up to 8 UTP ports {0..7}. However,
INDIRECT_ACCESS_ADDRESS_PHYNUM_MASK was using 2 bits instead of 3,
dropping the most significant bit during indirect register reads and
writes. Reading or writing ports 4, 5, 6, and 7 registers was actually
manipulating, respectively, ports 0, 1, 2, and 3 registers.
This is not sufficient but necessary to support any variant with more
than 4 UTP ports, like RTL8367S.
rtl8365mb_phy_{read,write} will now returns -EINVAL if phy is greater
than 7.
Fixes: 4af2950c50c8 ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: add rtl8365mb subdriver for RTL8365MB-VC")
Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This patch adds a realtek-smi subdriver for the RTL8365MB-VC 4+1 port
10/100/1000M switch controller. The driver has been developed based on a
GPL-licensed OS-agnostic Realtek vendor driver known as rtl8367c found
in the OpenWrt source tree.
Despite the name, the RTL8365MB-VC has an entirely different register
layout to the already-supported RTL8366RB ASIC. Notwithstanding this,
the structure of the rtl8365mb subdriver is loosely based on the rtl8366rb
subdriver. Like the 'rb, it establishes its own irqchip to handle
cascaded PHY link status interrupts.
The RTL8365MB-VC switch is capable of offloading a large number of
features from the software, but this patch introduces only the most
basic DSA driver functionality. The ports always function as standalone
ports, with bridging handled in software.
One more thing. Realtek's nomenclature for switches makes it hard to
know exactly what other ASICs might be supported by this driver. The
vendor driver goes by the name rtl8367c, but as far as I can tell, no
chip actually exists under this name. As such, the subdriver is named
rtl8365mb to emphasize the potentially limited support. But it is clear
from the vendor sources that a number of other more advanced switches
share a similar register layout, and further support should not be too
hard to add given access to the relevant hardware. With this in mind,
the subdriver has been written with as few assumptions about the
particular chip as is reasonable. But the RTL8365MB-VC is the only
hardware I have available, so some further work is surely needed.
Co-developed-by: Michael Rasmussen <mir@bang-olufsen.dk>
Signed-off-by: Michael Rasmussen <mir@bang-olufsen.dk>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
