summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-05-16wifi: rtw89: mcc: avoid redundant recalculations if no chance to improveZong-Zhe Yang
MCC will track the changes of beacon offset, and trigger a recalculation when the difference is larger than the tolerance. It means that a better pattern is expected after recalculating. However, in the cases which get a worse beacon offset, there is no chance to improve the pattern even if recalculating. So, bypass them. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250511035217.10410-7-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-05-16wifi: rtw89: mcc: deal with non-periodic NoAZong-Zhe Yang
Originally, MCC just took periodic NoA into account. When the connected GO announces non-periodic NoA and GC side is during MCC, sometimes GC cannot receive beacons well if the MCC scheduling conflicts with the non-periodic NoA planning. After the loss exceeds the tolerable amount, beacon filter will report connection loss. However, in this case, the loss is acceptable. So now, MCC will calculate the range of non-periodic NoA. And then, don't care beacon loss during the range. Besides, rtw89_mcc_fill_role_limit() only makes sense for GC. Remove the redundant check of GO. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250511035217.10410-6-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-05-16wifi: rtw89: mcc: introduce calculation of anchor patternZong-Zhe Yang
In the cases that two MCC roles' TBTTs are too close or too far, original MCC pattern calculation logic will lead to a result that both roles might not cover its TBTT with sufficient time. Introduce a new calculation logic called anchor pattern for these corner cases. It allows to choose one role as anchor to put its TBTT in the middle of its duration directly. For now, a P2P role has a higher priority to be chosen as an anchor. Then, if able, another role might need to depend on courtesy mechanism to take time from anchor. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250511035217.10410-5-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-05-16wifi: rtw89: mcc: add courtesy mechanism conditions to P2P rolesZong-Zhe Yang
In one enablement of courtesy mechanism, there is one provider and one receiver. And, receiver can use the provider's time in a given period. But, to make P2P NoA protocol work as expected as possible, GO should be present at the time it doesn't announce absent, and GC should not use the time when GO announces absent. So, don't enable courtesy mechanism if provider is GO or receiver is GC. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250511035217.10410-4-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-05-16wifi: rtw89: mcc: drop queued chanctx changes when stoppingZong-Zhe Yang
When MCC is about to stop, there may be some chanctx changes which are queued for work but have not yet been run. To avoid these changes from being processed in a wrong state (e.g. next new MCC instance), cancel the queued work and drop queued changes. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250511035217.10410-3-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-05-16wifi: rtw89: mcc: pass whom to stop at when pausing chanctxZong-Zhe Yang
When stopping MCC, FW can stop at a given MCC role following H2C command. When pausing chanctx during MCC, in general, the caller expects to process things with its chanctx. So, pass the caller as target and let FW stop MCC at it. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250511035217.10410-2-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-05-10wifi: rtw89: chan: re-calculate MLO DBCC mode during setting channelZong-Zhe Yang
Wi-Fi 7 chips have dual HW bands. After impending MLO support, they can work with HW-[0] / HW-[1] / HW-[0,1] according to active links. So, during setting channel, also re-calculate the MLO DBCC mode flag. Then, leaf chip functions of setting channel can configure with HWs based on current case. Besides, tweak the initial and idle MLO DBCC mode of Wi-Fi 7 chips to MLO_1_PLUS_1_1RF to work with dual HW bands. And, after disconnecting, due to no active links, MLO DBCC mode will re-calculate to idle case, i.e. MLO_1_PLUS_1_1RF. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250505072440.45113-5-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-05-05wifi: rtw89: introduce helper to get designated link for MLOZong-Zhe Yang
A link bound to HW band 0 was previously always assumed to exist, because it's true on non-MLD connection, and MLO connection is not supported yet. Now, start to consider MLO cases and prepare to enable MLO support in the following. Add skeleton of designated link. For single-link cases, helper returns the one. For multi-link cases, priorities can be scheduled. Then, drop assumption of link bound to HW band 0. One exception is that MCC doesn't work with MLD yet, so it still expects link on HW band 0 somewhere. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250428112456.13165-11-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-05-05wifi: rtw89: roc: dynamically handle link id and link instance indexZong-Zhe Yang
Originally, a macro, RTW89_ROC_BY_LINK_INDEX, is used to decide the link which deals with the ROC process. Before enabling MLO support, it's fine to hard-code RTW89_ROC_BY_LINK_INDEX as 0 since the link instance-0 (on HW-0) is always active. But, for the impending enablement of MLO support, tweak the leaf functions to dynamically handle ROC link instance index. Besides, in the follow-up, ROC caller will get a designated link and will then drop RTW89_ROC_BY_LINK_INDEX. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250428112456.13165-10-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-04-28wifi: rtw89: mcc: avoid that loose pattern sets negative timing for auxiliary GOZong-Zhe Yang
A MCC (multi-channel concurrency) schedule is like the following. |< mcc interval >| |< duration ref >|< duration aux >| |< tob ref >|< toa ref >|< tob aux >|< toa aux >| V V tbtt ref tbtt aux |< beacon offset >| Original logic might unexpectedly calculate toa (time offset ahead) of auxiliary role to be negative even when there is no role timing limit. If toa-aux is negative, TBTT-aux would in logic fall into duration-ref. Then, if auxiliary role is GO unfortunately, it cannot guarantee that beacons will TX well. So now, when deciding the lower bound of toa-ref, take toa-aux into account. Make toa-aux at least be zero in normal cases. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250422014620.18421-13-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-04-28wifi: rtw89: mcc: refine filling function of start TSFZong-Zhe Yang
Since tob (time offset behind) could be negative, change the type of tob in microsecond to s32. And, refine accumulation with while-loop by calculation with roundup_u64(). Besides, as long as one of the MCC roles is GO, use the short MCC start time. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250422014620.18421-12-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-04-28wifi: rtw89: mcc: support courtesy mechanism on both roles at the same timeZong-Zhe Yang
MCC has a courtesy mechanism which allows one role to use another's duration in a given cycle. Originally, this courtesy mechanism only supports in one direction. However, in some field cases, both of MCC roles may simultaneously have timing configurations that are not good enough. So, support courtesy mechanism in both directions. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250422014620.18421-11-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-04-28wifi: rtw89: mcc: update entire plan when courtesy config changesZong-Zhe Yang
MCC has a courtesy mechanism which allows one role to use another's duration in a given cycle. Courtesy mechanism will be enabled when one role has a not perfect duration. Otherwise, not. When MCC updates, duration of each role will be re-calculated. And then, the new courtesy config might be different from the old one. However, to change courtesy config, the entire MCC plan requires to be renewed when MCC updates. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250422014620.18421-10-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-04-28wifi: rtw89: mcc: handle the case where NoA start time has passedZong-Zhe Yang
MCC will limit the time a role can use in a schedule according to the periodic NoA. Original logic didn't consider the case where NoA start time has passed. It might lead to inaccurate result. So, tweak it. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250422014620.18421-9-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-04-28wifi: rtw89: mcc: make GO+STA mode calculate dynamic beacon offsetZong-Zhe Yang
There are two roles during MCC and the offset between their TBTT is called beacon offset. Originally, when MCC runs GO+STA mode, it used fixed beacon offset to simplify some logic because GO role can master its TSF. However, if MCC is stopped and restarted before a same GO is down, its TSF might be discontinuous. Then, there might be undefined behavior happens in GC sides. So, to let a same GO have a continuous TSF, MCC no longer changes its TSF to meet a fixed beacon offset. Instead, GO+STA mode also calculates beacon offset dynamically as what GC+STA mode did. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250422014620.18421-8-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-03-13wifi: rtw89: refine mechanism of TASKuan-Chung Chen
TAS state switching mechanism now incorporates the TX ratio as a decision parameter. The average power calculation has been improved by using a higher resolution conversion from dBm to linear. During scan or MCC operations, TAS state is forced to static SAR and suspend the average power calculation. Additionally, TAS window size depends on the regulatory domain and band to ensure compliance. TAS is enabled when permitted by the regulatory domain and is currently supported on the 8852CE. For debugging, add a flag to disable_dm that can stop TAS mechanism. Co-developed-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Chung Chen <damon.chen@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250306021144.12854-3-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-02-03wifi: rtw89: manual cosmetic along lockdep_assert_wiphy()Ping-Ke Shih
With spatch script, already remove most driver mutex and generate lockdep_assert_wiphy(), and some are needed to refine manually further to be expected: - lockdep_assert_wiphy() always be the first statement in function - return directly rather than unnecessary goto - change assert from mutex to wiphy lock, which script can't convert automatically. Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250122060310.31976-9-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-02-03wifi: rtw89: remove consumers of driver mutexPing-Ke Shih
All need lock have taken both driver mutex and wiphy lock, so we can remove driver mutex safely by below spatch script. Also, check every lockdep_assert_wiphy() is executed without locks warning at runtime. @ rule1_1 @ @@ - lockdep_assert_held(&rtwdev->mutex); + lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy); @ rule1_2 @ @@ - guard(mutex)(&rtwdev->mutex); + lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy); @ rule2_1 @ @@ - mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex); + lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy); ... - mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex); @ rule2_2 @ @@ - mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex); + lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy); ... - mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex); @ rule3_1 @ type t; identifier fn; @@ t fn(struct wiphy *wiphy, ...) { ... - lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy); + lockdep_assert_wiphy(wiphy); ... } @ rule3_1_1 @ type t; identifier fn; @@ t fn(...) { ... struct wiphy *wiphy = ...; ... - lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy); + lockdep_assert_wiphy(wiphy); ... } @ rule3_2 @ type t; identifier fn; @@ t fn(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, ...) { ... - lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy); + lockdep_assert_wiphy(hw->wiphy); ... } @ rule3_2_1 @ type t; identifier fn; @@ t fn(...) { ... struct ieee80211_hw *hw = ...; ... - lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy); + lockdep_assert_wiphy(hw->wiphy); ... } The compiler warnings will be fixed manually by latter patch: rtw89/mac80211.c:371:1: warning: statement expected after label Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250122060310.31976-8-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-02-03wifi: rtw89: use wiphy_work() to replace ieee802111_work()Ping-Ke Shih
For certain works protected by driver mutex, use wiphy_work() directly to have wiphy lock held naturally. Then every this kind of works is protected by both wiphy lock and driver mutex. Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250122060310.31976-3-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-01-12wifi: rtw89: mcc: consider time limits not divisible by 1024Zong-Zhe Yang
For each MCC role, time limits, including max_tob_us, max_toa_us, and mac_dur_us, are calculated if there are NoA attributes. The relation between these time limits is "max_dur_us = max_tob_us + max_toa_us". Then, the unit is converted from us to TU. However, originally, each time limit was divided by 1024 independently. It missed to consider the cases that max_tob_us or max_toa_us is not divisible by 1024. It causes the result breaks "max_dur (TU) = max_tob (TU) + max_toa (TU)". Finally, when MCC calculates pattern parameters based on these kinds of time limits, it might not perform well. Fixes: b09df09b55fb ("wifi: rtw89: mcc: initialize start flow") Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250103074412.124066-1-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-01-12wifi: rtw89: chan: fix soft lockup in rtw89_entity_recalc_mgnt_roles()Zong-Zhe Yang
During rtw89_entity_recalc_mgnt_roles(), there is a normalizing process which will re-order the list if an entry with target pattern is found. And once one is found, should have aborted the list_for_each_entry. But, `break` just aborted the inner for-loop. The outer list_for_each_entry still continues. Normally, only the first entry will match the target pattern, and the re-ordering will change nothing, so there won't be soft lockup. However, in some special cases, soft lockup would happen. Fix it by `goto fill` to break from the list_for_each_entry. The following is a sample of kernel log for this problem. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 26s! [wpa_supplicant:2055] [...] RIP: 0010:rtw89_entity_recalc ([...] chan.c:392 chan.c:479) rtw89_core [...] Fixes: 68ec751b2881 ("wifi: rtw89: chan: manage active interfaces") Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241231004811.8646-3-pkshih@realtek.com
2025-01-12wifi: rtw89: fix proceeding MCC with wrong scanning state after sequence changesZong-Zhe Yang
When starting/proceeding MCC, it will abort an ongoing hw scan process. In the proceeding cases, it unexpectedly tries to abort a non-exist hw scan process. Then, a trace shown at the bottom will happen. This problem is caused by a previous commit which changed some call sequence inside rtw89_hw_scan_complete() to fix some coex problems. These changes lead to our scanning flag was not cleared when proceeding MCC. To keep the fixes on coex, and resolve the problem here, re-consider the related call sequence. The known sequence requirements are listed below. * the old sequence: A. notify coex B. clear scanning flag C. proceed chanctx C-1. set channel C-2. proceed MCC (the problem: A needs to be after C-1) * the current sequence: C. proceed chanctx C-1. set channel C-2. proceed MCC A. notify coex B. clear scanning flag (the problem: C-2 needs to be after B) So, now let hw scan caller pass a callback to proceed chanctx if needed. Then, the new sequence will be like the below. C-1. set channel A. notify coex B. clear scanning flag C-2. proceed MCC The following is the kernel log for the problem in current sequence. rtw89_8852be 0000:04:00.0: rtw89_hw_scan_offload failed ret -110 ------------[ cut here ]------------ [...] CPU: 2 PID: 3991 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Tainted: G OE 6.6.17 #3 Hardware name: LENOVO 2356AD1/2356AD1, BIOS G7ETB3WW (2.73 ) 11/28/2018 Workqueue: events_unbound wiphy_work_cancel [cfg80211] RIP: 0010:ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211] Code: 9c 24 d0 11 00 00 49 39 dd 0f 85 46 ff ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 09 2d RSP: 0018:ffffb27783643d48 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8a2280964bc0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8a23df580900 RBP: ffffb27783643d88 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000400 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000008268 R12: ffff8a23df580900 R13: ffff8a23df581b00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a258e680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f26a0654000 CR3: 000000002ea2e002 CR4: 00000000001706e0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x68/0x70 ? ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211] ? __warn+0x8f/0x150 ? ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211] ? report_bug+0x1f5/0x200 ? handle_bug+0x46/0x80 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? ieee80211_sched_scan_stopped+0xaea/0xd80 [mac80211] ieee80211_scan_work+0x14a/0x650 [mac80211] ? __queue_work+0x10f/0x410 wiphy_work_cancel+0x2fb/0x310 [cfg80211] process_scheduled_works+0x9d/0x390 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 worker_thread+0x15b/0x2d0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x108/0x140 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fixes: f16c40acd319 ("wifi: rtw89: Fix TX fail with A2DP after scanning") Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241231004811.8646-2-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-10-29wifi: rtw89: tweak setting of channel and TX power for MLOZong-Zhe Yang
Setting of channel and TX power depend on channel contexts, but original code cannot handle combination of MCC (multi-channel concurrency) and MLO well. So according to active interfaces, we generate a table for current channel contexts. And then based on entity mode, we get the corresponding channel context to apply during channel or TX power setting. When MLO is supported, there will be dual-PHY and we will apply the channel context of the 2nd link to the 2nd PHY. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241022083106.149252-5-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-10-29wifi: rtw89: chan: manage active interfacesZong-Zhe Yang
To set channel well for combination of MCC (multi-channel concurrency) and impending MLO support, we need a method to manage relation between active interfaces and channel contexts. If an interface owns at least one active link, we call it an active interface. We add a list to manage active ones. Basically, the list follows the active order except for the below case. To be compatible with legacy behavior, the first interface that owns the first channel context will put at the first entry in the list when recalculating. Besides, MCC can also select and fill roles based on the above active list. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241022083106.149252-4-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-09-24wifi: rtw89: tweak driver architecture for impending MLO supportZong-Zhe Yang
The drv_priv hooked to mac80211 become as below. (drv_priv) (instance-0) +---------------+ +-----------+ +----------------+ | ieee80211_vif | <---> | rtw89_vif | -------> | rtw89_vif_link | +---------------+ +-----------+ | +----------------+ | | (instance-1) | +----------------+ +---> | rtw89_vif_link | +----------------+ (drv_priv) (instance-0) +---------------+ +-----------+ +----------------+ | ieee80211_sta | <---> | rtw89_sta | -------> | rtw89_sta_link | +---------------+ +-----------+ | +----------------+ | | (instance-1) | +----------------+ +---> | rtw89_sta_link | +----------------+ The relation bewteen mac80211 link_id and our link instance is like below. |\ (link_id) | \ 0 -------- | | 1 -------- | | ------ instance-0 (link_id: X) -> work on HW band 0 2 -------- | | ... | | ------ instance-1 (link_id: Y) -> work on HW band 1 14 -------- | | | / |/ N.B. For cases of non-MLD connection, we set our link instance-0 active with link_id 0. So, our code flow can be compatible between non-MLD connection and MLD connection. Based on above, we tweak entire driver architecture first. But, we don't dynamically enable multiple links here. That will be handled separately. Most of the things changed here are changing flows to iterate all active links and read bss_conf/link_sta data according to target link. And, for cases of scan, ROC, WOW, we use instance-0 to deal with the request. There are some things listed below, which work for now but need to extend before multiple active links. 1. tx path select suitable link instance among multiple active links 2. rx path determine rx link by PPDU instead of always link instance-0 3. CAM apply MLD pairwise key to any active links dynamically Besides, PS code cannot easily work along with tweaking architecture. With supporting MLO flag (currently false), we disable PS first and will fix it by another commit in the following. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240916053158.47350-8-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-09-24wifi: rtw89: read bss_conf corresponding to the linkZong-Zhe Yang
Tweak code to not always access vif->bss_conf directly. Instead, according to link_id, read target bss_conf from vif->link_conf[]. For now, rtwvif_link->link_id keeps 0. When driver starts to support MLO, the link_id will be assigned. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240916053158.47350-4-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-09-24wifi: rtw89: rename rtw89_sta to rtw89_sta_link ahead for MLOZong-Zhe Yang
This is an intermediate version that is separated from subsequent major MLO changes, so some functions' namings are not really determined here. e.g. struct rtw89_sta_link *sta_to_rtwsta_safe(struct ieee80211_sta *sta) No logic is changed. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240916053158.47350-3-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-09-24wifi: rtw89: rename rtw89_vif to rtw89_vif_link ahead for MLOZong-Zhe Yang
This is an intermediate version that is separated from subsequent major MLO changes, so some functions' namings are not really determined here. e.g. struct rtw89_vif_link *vif_to_rtwvif_safe(struct ieee80211_vif *vif) No logic is changed. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240916053158.47350-2-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-08-27wifi: rtw89: rename roc_entity_idx to roc_chanctx_idxZong-Zhe Yang
The target enum has been renamed to rtw89_"chanctx"_idx. So for readability, rename roc_entity_idx to roc_"chanctx"_idx to align. No logic is changed. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819091724.33730-8-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-08-02wifi: rtw89: rename sub_entity to chanctxZong-Zhe Yang
Originally, we planed to fill MAC_0/1 indicators with chanctx and use sub_entity_xxx for these things. However, there are some reasons listed below which make us give up this plan after we know our Wi-Fi 7 HW design. 1. one link is bound to one HW band during its life time but, one link might change chanctx dynamically 2. in concurrent mode, assume 1st vif is MLD 1st vif's 2nd link might use the same chanctx as 2nd vif but, they are not on the same HW band So, we let sub_entity_xxx stuffs deal with only chanctx now. And, to be more readable, we rename sub_entity related words to chanctx. No logic is changed. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240727080650.12195-4-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-08-02wifi: rtw89: mcc: stop at a role holding chanctxZong-Zhe Yang
In general, MCC (multi-channel concurrency) stops when some chanctx is unassigned. Originally, we let FW to stop at a fixed role. However, it might be the one to be unassigned. So, iterate MCC roles and select one which is still holding chanctx. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240727080650.12195-3-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-08-02wifi: rtw89: chan: refine MCC re-plan flow when unassign chanctxZong-Zhe Yang
Originally during unassign-chanctx, MCC (multi-channel concurrency) is re-planed before set-channel if need. But, we might calculate MCC stuffs based on old channel info. And, the following set-channel might be racing with FW MCC state mechanism. So, we refine this flow. Now, if MCC re-plan is needed here, it will be done after set-channel. Besides, to be more rigorous, we now ensure entity isn't paused before we deal with MCC things here. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240727080650.12195-2-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-07-05wifi: rtw89: unify the selection logic of RFK table when MCCZong-Zhe Yang
Driver will notify FW the target index of RFK table to use at some moments. When MCC (multi-channel concurrent), the correctness of the notification is especially important. We now unify the selection logic of RFK table as below among chips. 1. check each table if it matches target channel 2. check all tables if any is idle by iterating active channels 3. replace the first table if all are busy unexpectedly Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240702124452.18747-2-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-06-03wifi: rtw89: chan: Use swap() in rtw89_swap_sub_entity()Jiapeng Chong
Use existing swap() function instead of keeping duplicate source code. ./drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/chan.c:2336:32-33: WARNING opportunity for swap(). Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9174 Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://msgid.link/20240529020244.129027-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
2024-02-15wifi: rtw89: chan: support MCC on Wi-Fi 7 chipsZong-Zhe Yang
On Wi-Fi 7 chips, concurrent stuffs are supported by FW MRC series (multi-role concurrent) functions. And, driver has implemented the corresponding SW handling in patches in front of this one. Now, we extend SW MCC (multi-channel concurrent) flow to work on Wi-Fi 7 chips. In SW point of view, things look as below. | SW | | FW func | | | | H2C/C2H | -------------------------------------------- | | ax | | | /----| FW MCC func | | MCC | -- chip --+ | | | \----| FW MRC func | | | be | Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://msgid.link/20240213073514.23796-5-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-02-12wifi: rtw89: chan: MCC take reconfig into accountZong-Zhe Yang
During mac80211 reconfig, chanctx ops of multiple channels might not be called in order as normal cases. However, we expect the first active chanctx always to be put at our sub entity index 0. So, if it does not, we do a swap there. Besides, reconfig won't allocate a new chanctx object. So, we should reset the reference count when ops add chanctx. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://msgid.link/20240206030624.23382-7-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-02-12wifi: rtw89: chan: move handling from add/remove to assign/unassign for MLOZong-Zhe Yang
After MLO, we will need to consider not only active chanctx but also active interfaces (roles) to decide entity things. So in advance, we move handling from chanctx_ops::add/remove to chanctx_ops::assign_vif/unassign_vif. Then, we can recalculate and aware active interfaces' changes. For now, behavior should not be really different, since active chanctx and active interface are one-to-one mapping before MLO. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://msgid.link/20240206030624.23382-6-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-02-12wifi: rtw89: chan: tweak weight recalc ahead before MLOZong-Zhe Yang
Originally, we consider weight only based on how many chanctxs that mac80211 sets. However, we need to consider both active chanctxs and active interfaces to distinguish MCC (multiple channel concurrent) from impending MLO. Although the logic of handling is extended, for now, behavior might not be different under current condition. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://msgid.link/20240206030624.23382-5-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-02-12wifi: rtw89: chan: tweak bitmap recalc ahead before MLOZong-Zhe Yang
Originally, we just declared two sub-entity, and according to rolling down mechanism, we ensured that index 0 contained sub-entity as long as there are sub-entity. So, we could use for-loop after deciding the last index. But, we are preparing to expand num of sub-entity for MLO. Then, there won't be just two sub-entity. And, there might be holes between two bits in the bitmap. So, we cannot simply do for-loop as before. Instead, we need to follow the set bits. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://msgid.link/20240206030624.23382-4-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-02-12wifi: rtw89: chan: add sub-entity swap function to cover replacingZong-Zhe Yang
Originally, we replaced sub-entity of index 0 with another one in some cases. However, we will need a swap here in following implementations. So, we introduce it ahead and change code from replacing to swapping. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://msgid.link/20240206030624.23382-3-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-02-12wifi: rtw89: drop TIMING_BEACON_ONLY and sync beacon TSF by selfZong-Zhe Yang
Some of our calculation during concurrent mode depend on last beacon TSF. Originally, we just set IEEE80211_HW_TIMING_BEACON_ONLY and get what we want from mac80211. But, IEEE80211_HW_TIMING_BEACON_ONLY will be restricted once we declare MLO. Since we are about to consider the MLO stuffs, so sync beacon TSF by ourselves now and unset IEEE80211_HW_TIMING_BEACON_ONLY. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://msgid.link/20240206030624.23382-2-pkshih@realtek.com
2024-01-12wifi: rtw89: add chip_ops::update_beacon to abstract update beacon operationPing-Ke Shih
Since coming WiFi 7 and existing chips use different update_beacon() format, add to abstract selection of H2C command. Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://msgid.link/20240108091359.67636-1-pkshih@realtek.com
2023-09-28wifi: rtw89: pause/proceed MCC for ROC and HW scanZong-Zhe Yang
During (TDMA-based) MCC (multi-channel concurrency), the below two cases might not have a good behavior on channel usage. * ROC (remain on channel) * HW scan So, we tend to separate them from MCC. The two cases would expect to operate the channel to which they want. However, during MCC, channels are scheduled by FW MCC state mechanism. So, channels cannot be controlled explicitly. To avoid the two cases from operating wrong channels with chance, we pause MCC (essentially stop FW MCC) once the two cases are coming. And then, we proceed MCC again (essentially restart FW MCC) once the two cases finish. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921003559.11588-3-pkshih@realtek.com
2023-09-28wifi: rtw89: mcc: fix NoA start time when GO is auxiliaryZong-Zhe Yang
Under TDMA-based MCC (multi-channel concurrency), there are two roles, reference and auxiliary. We arrange MCC timeline based on time domain of reference role. Then, we calculate NoA start time according to MCC timeline. Besides, when MCC runs GO+STA mode, we plan an offset between GO time domain and STA time domain to make their TBTTs have a time gap. However, if GO is auxiliary role instead of reference role, NoA start time is described by STA time domain instead of GO time domain. To fix this, we apply the offset mentioned above to NoA start time to convert time domain from STA to GO. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921003559.11588-2-pkshih@realtek.com
2023-09-22wifi: rtw89: add subband index of primary channel to struct rtw89_chanPing-Ke Shih
The subband index is a hardware value of relationship between primary channel and bandwidth, and it is used by setting channel/bandwidth to specify the primary channel. Because this index is only needed when bandwidth >= 20 MHz, adjust order of enumerator bandwidth to access offsets array easier. To prevent misuse RTW89_CHANNEL_WIDTH_NUM as size, change it to RTW89_CHANNEL_WIDTH_ORDINARY_NUM that will be the size of array. The enumerator values of bandwidth (before ordinary number) will be also used by upcoming TX power table built in firmware file, so add a comment to remind keeping the order. Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920074322.42898-2-pkshih@realtek.com
2023-09-18wifi: rtw89: mcc: deal with beacon NoA if GO existsZong-Zhe Yang
In MCC STA+GO mode, we calculate NoA information and fill it into the beacon of P2P GO. Since NoA uses only 32 bits to describe time things, we need to deal with renewal when TSF[63:32] is carried. We trigger FW to notify that. Then, we can update NoA information for new time period once we get notification from FW. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908031145.20931-9-pkshih@realtek.com
2023-09-18wifi: rtw89: mcc: deal with BT slot changeZong-Zhe Yang
When receiving request of adjusting BT slot from coex. mechanism, we need to fetch the new BT slot and use the new one to calculate MCC (multi-channel concurrency) pattern. Then, we update the new MCC pattern to FW. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908031145.20931-8-pkshih@realtek.com
2023-09-18wifi: rtw89: mcc: deal with P2P PS changeZong-Zhe Yang
MCC fills duration limit of a role according to NoA description. If P2P PS changes during MCC, we don't process P2P PS via normal flow. Instead, we re-fill duration limit of the role for new NoA description, and then we do MCC update. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908031145.20931-7-pkshih@realtek.com
2023-09-18wifi: rtw89: mcc: track beacon offset and update when neededZong-Zhe Yang
In MCC STA+GC mode, the offset between TBTTs of remote AP and remote GO might change. If the change is larger than tolerance, we should update MCC after re-calculating parameters for new things. So, we track that in rtw89_track_work() now. And, we add MCC update flow to tell FW either to change durations of roles or to replace entire pattern according to how MCC plans BT slot. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908031145.20931-6-pkshih@realtek.com
2023-09-18wifi: rtw89: mcc: update role bitmap when changedZong-Zhe Yang
Each MCC (multi-channel concurrency) role maintains a bitmap of mac IDs. The bitmap is supposed to contain the two points below. * mac ID of itself * mac ID(s) of STA(s) connecting to it Under STA+GC mode, the bitmaps of both roles should not change. However, under STA+GO mode, the bitmap of GO may change due to P2P clients which connect/disconnect to/from it. FW controls (TDMA-based) MCC things via mac IDs in bitmap of each role. For example, mac IDs are required by FW when it wants to pause role1's TX in role0 slot. So, to sync between driver and FW, we update the new mac ID bitmap of GO to FW once it's changed. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230908031145.20931-5-pkshih@realtek.com
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2025-07-25 15:12:14 +0000