summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-04-14rxrpc: Allow CHALLENGEs to the passed to the app for a RESPONSEDavid Howells
Allow the app to request that CHALLENGEs be passed to it through an out-of-band queue that allows recvmsg() to pick it up so that the app can add data to it with sendmsg(). This will allow the application (AFS or userspace) to interact with the process if it wants to and put values into user-defined fields. This will be used by AFS when talking to a fileserver to supply that fileserver with a crypto key by which callback RPCs can be encrypted (ie. notifications from the fileserver to the client). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250411095303.2316168-5-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2025-04-14rxrpc: Remove some socket lock acquire/release annotationsDavid Howells
Remove some socket lock acquire/release annotations as lock_sock() and release_sock() don't have them and so the checker gets confused. Removing all of them, however, causes warnings about "context imbalance" and "wrong count at exit" to occur instead. Probably lock_sock() and release_sock() should have annotations on indicating their taking of sk_lock - there is a dep_map in socket_lock_t, but I don't know if that matters to the static checker. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250411095303.2316168-4-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2025-04-14rxrpc: kdoc: Update function descriptions and add link from rxrpc.rstDavid Howells
Update the kerneldoc function descriptions to add "Return:" sections for AF_RXRPC exported functions that have return values to stop the kdoc builder from throwing warnings. Also add links from the rxrpc.rst API doc to add a function API reference at the end. (Note that the API doc really needs updating, but that's beyond this patchset). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250411095303.2316168-2-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2025-02-11rxrpc: Fix alteration of headers whilst zerocopy pendingDavid Howells
rxrpc: Fix alteration of headers whilst zerocopy pending AF_RXRPC now uses MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to do zerocopy of the DATA packets when it transmits them, but to reduce the number of descriptors required in the DMA ring, it allocates a space for the protocol header in the memory immediately before the data content so that it can include both in a single descriptor. This is used for either the main RX header or the smaller jumbo subpacket header as appropriate: +----+------+ | RX | | +-+--+DATA | |JH| | +--+------+ Now, when it stitches a large jumbo packet together from a number of individual DATA packets (each of which is 1412 bytes of data), it uses the full RX header from the first and then the jumbo subpacket header for the rest of the components: +---+--+------+--+------+--+------+--+------+--+------+--+------+ |UDP|RX|DATA |JH|DATA |JH|DATA |JH|DATA |JH|DATA |JH|DATA | +---+--+------+--+------+--+------+--+------+--+------+--+------+ As mentioned, the main RX header and the jumbo header overlay one another in memory and the formats don't match, so switching from one to the other means rearranging the fields and adjusting the flags. However, now that TLP has been included, it wants to retransmit the last subpacket as a new data packet on its own, which means switching between the header formats... and if the transmission is still pending, because of the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, we end up corrupting the jumbo subheader. This has a variety of effects, with the RX service number overwriting the jumbo checksum/key number field and the RX checksum overwriting the jumbo flags - resulting in, at the very least, a confused connection-level abort from the peer. Fix this by leaving the jumbo header in the allocation with the data, but allocating the RX header from the page frag allocator and concocting it on the fly at the point of transmission as it does for ACK packets. Fixes: 7c482665931b ("rxrpc: Implement RACK/TLP to deal with transmission stalls [RFC8985]") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2181712.1739131675@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2025-02-05rxrpc: Fix call state set to not include the SERVER_SECURING stateDavid Howells
The RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SECURING state doesn't really belong with the other states in the call's state set as the other states govern the call's Rx/Tx phase transition and govern when packets can and can't be received or transmitted. The "Securing" state doesn't actually govern the reception of packets and would need to be split depending on whether or not we've received the last packet yet (to mirror RECV_REQUEST/ACK_REQUEST). The "Securing" state is more about whether or not we can start forwarding packets to the application as recvmsg will need to decode them and the decoding can't take place until the challenge/response exchange has completed. Fix this by removing the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SECURING state from the state set and, instead, using a flag, RXRPC_CALL_CONN_CHALLENGING, to track whether or not we can queue the call for reception by recvmsg() or notify the kernel app that data is ready. In the event that we've already received all the packets, the connection event handler will poke the app layer in the appropriate manner. Also there's a race whereby the app layer sees the last packet before rxrpc has managed to end the rx phase and change the state to one amenable to allowing a reply. Fix this by queuing the packet after calling rxrpc_end_rx_phase(). Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250204230558.712536-2-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-16rxrpc: Fix ability to add more data to a call once MSG_MORE deassertedDavid Howells
When userspace is adding data to an RPC call for transmission, it must pass MSG_MORE to sendmsg() if it intends to add more data in future calls to sendmsg(). Calling sendmsg() without MSG_MORE being asserted closes the transmission phase of the call (assuming sendmsg() adds all the data presented) and further attempts to add more data should be rejected. However, this is no longer the case. The change of call state that was previously the guard got bumped over to the I/O thread, which leaves a window for a repeat sendmsg() to insert more data. This previously went unnoticed, but the more recent patch that changed the structures behind the Tx queue added a warning: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 6639 at net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:296 rxrpc_send_data+0x3f2/0x860 and rejected the additional data, returning error EPROTO. Fix this by adding a guard flag to the call, setting the flag when we queue the final packet and then rejecting further attempts to add data with EPROTO. Fixes: 2d689424b618 ("rxrpc: Move call state changes from sendmsg to I/O thread") Reported-by: syzbot+ff11be94dfcd7a5af8da@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6757fb68.050a0220.2477f.005f.GAE@google.com/ Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: syzbot+ff11be94dfcd7a5af8da@syzkaller.appspotmail.com cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2870480.1734037462@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-09rxrpc: Manage RTT per-call rather than per-peerDavid Howells
Manage the determination of RTT on a per-call (ie. per-RPC op) basis rather than on a per-peer basis, averaging across all calls going to that peer. The problem is that the RTT measurements from the initial packets on a call may be off because the server may do some setting up (such as getting a lock on a file) before accepting the rest of the data in the RPC and, further, the RTT may be affected by server-side file operations, for instance if a large amount of data is being written or read. Note: When handling the FS.StoreData-type RPCs, for example, the server uses the userStatus field in the header of ACK packets as supplementary flow control to aid in managing this. AF_RXRPC does not yet support this, but it should be added. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-09rxrpc: Use irq-disabling spinlocks between app and I/O threadDavid Howells
Where a spinlock is used by both the application thread and the I/O thread, use irq-disabling locking so that an interrupt taken on the app thread doesn't also slow down the I/O thread. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-09rxrpc: Use the new rxrpc_tx_queue struct to more efficiently process ACKsDavid Howells
With the change in the structure of the transmission buffer to store buffers in bunches of 32 or 64 (BITS_PER_LONG) we can place sets of per-buffer flags into the rxrpc_tx_queue struct rather than storing them in rxrpc_tx_buf, thereby vastly increasing efficiency when assessing the SACK table in an ACK packet. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241204074710.990092-24-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-09rxrpc: call->acks_hard_ack is now the same call->tx_bottom, so remove itDavid Howells
Now that packets are removed from the Tx queue in the rotation function rather than being cleaned up later, call->acks_hard_ack now advances in step with call->tx_bottom, so remove it. Some of the places call->acks_hard_ack is used in the rxrpc tracepoints are replaced by call->acks_first_seq instead as that's the peer's reported idea of the hard-ACK point. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241204074710.990092-20-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-09rxrpc: Implement progressive transmission queue structDavid Howells
We need to scan the buffers in the transmission queue occasionally when processing ACKs, but the transmission queue is currently a linked list of transmission buffers which, when we eventually expand the Tx window to 8192 packets will be very slow to walk. Instead, pull the fields we need to examine a lot (last sent time, retransmitted flag) into a new struct rxrpc_txqueue and make each one hold an array of 32 or 64 packets. The transmission queue is then a list of these structs, each pointing to a contiguous set of packets. Scanning is then a lot faster as the flags and timestamps are concentrated in the CPU dcache. The transmission timestamps are stored as a number of microseconds from a base ktime to reduce memory requirements. This should be fine provided we manage to transmit an entire buffer within an hour. This will make implementing RACK-TLP [RFC8985] easier as it will be less costly to scan the transmission buffers. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241204074710.990092-19-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-09rxrpc: Don't need barrier for ->tx_bottom and ->acks_hard_ackDavid Howells
We don't need a barrier for the ->tx_bottom value (which indicates the lowest sequence still in the transmission queue) and the ->acks_hard_ack value (which tracks the DATA packets hard-ack'd by the latest ACK packet received and thus indicates which DATA packets can now be discarded) as the app thread doesn't use either value as a reference to memory to access. Rather, the app thread merely uses these as a guide to how much space is available in the transmission queue Change the code to use READ/WRITE_ONCE() instead. Also, change rxrpc_check_tx_space() to use the same value for tx_bottom throughout. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241204074710.990092-18-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-09rxrpc: Separate the packet length from the data length in rxrpc_txbufDavid Howells
Separate the packet length from the data length (txb->len) stored in the rxrpc_txbuf to make security calculations easier. Also store the allocation size as that's an upper bound on the size of the security wrapper and change a number of fields to unsigned short as the amount of data can't exceed the capacity of a UDP packet. Also, whilst we're at it, use kzalloc() for txbufs. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241204074710.990092-11-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-09rxrpc: Don't set the MORE-PACKETS rxrpc wire header flagDavid Howells
The MORE-PACKETS rxrpc header flag hasn't actually been looked at by anything since 1988 and not all implementations generate it. Change rxrpc so that it doesn't set MORE-PACKETS at all rather than setting it inconsistently. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241204074710.990092-6-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-12-09rxrpc: Use umin() and umax() rather than min_t()/max_t() where possibleDavid Howells
Use umin() and umax() rather than min_t()/max_t() where the type specified is an unsigned type. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241204074710.990092-4-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-11-11rxrpc: Add a tracepoint for aborts being proposedDavid Howells
Add a tracepoint to rxrpc to trace the proposal of an abort. The abort is performed asynchronously by the I/O thread. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/726356.1730898045@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-10-03rxrpc: Fix uninitialised variable in rxrpc_send_data()David Howells
Fix the uninitialised txb variable in rxrpc_send_data() by moving the code that loads it above all the jumps to maybe_error, txb being stored back into call->tx_pending right before the normal return. Fixes: b0f571ecd794 ("rxrpc: Fix locking in rxrpc's sendmsg") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2024-October/008896.html Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001132702.3122709-3-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-03-14rxrpc: Fix error check on ->alloc_txbuf()David Howells
rxrpc_alloc_*_txbuf() and ->alloc_txbuf() return NULL to indicate no memory, but rxrpc_send_data() uses IS_ERR(). Fix rxrpc_send_data() to check for NULL only and set -ENOMEM if it sees that. Fixes: 49489bb03a50 ("rxrpc: Do zerocopy using MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and page frags") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
2024-03-05rxrpc: Use ktimes for call timeout tracking and set the timer lazilyDavid Howells
Track the call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies as the latter's granularity is too high and only set the timer at the end of the event handling function. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
2024-03-05rxrpc: Do zerocopy using MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and page fragsDavid Howells
Switch from keeping the transmission buffers in the rxrpc_txbuf struct and allocated from the slab, to allocating them using page fragment allocators (which uses raw pages), thereby allowing them to be passed to MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and avoid copying into the UDP buffers. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
2024-02-29rxrpc: Add a kvec[] to the rxrpc_txbuf structDavid Howells
Add a kvec[] to the rxrpc_txbuf struct to point to the contributory buffers for a packet. Start with just a single element for now, but this will be expanded later. Make the ACK sending function use it, which means that rxrpc_fill_out_ack() doesn't need to return the size of the sack table, padding and trailer. Make the data sending code use it, both in where sendmsg() packages code up into txbufs and where those txbufs are transmitted. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
2024-02-29rxrpc: Convert rxrpc_txbuf::flags into a mask and don't use atomicsDavid Howells
Convert the transmission buffer flags into a mask and use | and & rather than bitops functions (atomic ops are not required as only the I/O thread can manipulate them once submitted for transmission). The bottom byte can then correspond directly to the Rx protocol header flags. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
2023-12-24rxrpc, afs: Allow afs to pin rxrpc_peer objectsDavid Howells
Change rxrpc's API such that: (1) A new function, rxrpc_kernel_lookup_peer(), is provided to look up an rxrpc_peer record for a remote address and a corresponding function, rxrpc_kernel_put_peer(), is provided to dispose of it again. (2) When setting up a call, the rxrpc_peer object used during a call is now passed in rather than being set up by rxrpc_connect_call(). For afs, this meenat passing it to rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() rather than the full address (the service ID then has to be passed in as a separate parameter). (3) A new function, rxrpc_kernel_remote_addr(), is added so that afs can get a pointer to the transport address for display purposed, and another, rxrpc_kernel_remote_srx(), to gain a pointer to the full rxrpc address. (4) The function to retrieve the RTT from a call, rxrpc_kernel_get_srtt(), is then altered to take a peer. This now returns the RTT or -1 if there are insufficient samples. (5) Rename rxrpc_kernel_get_peer() to rxrpc_kernel_call_get_peer(). (6) Provide a new function, rxrpc_kernel_get_peer(), to get a ref on a peer the caller already has. This allows the afs filesystem to pin the rxrpc_peer records that it is using, allowing faster lookups and pointer comparisons rather than comparing sockaddr_rxrpc contents. It also makes it easier to get hold of the RTT. The following changes are made to afs: (1) The addr_list struct's addrs[] elements now hold a peer struct pointer and a service ID rather than a sockaddr_rxrpc. (2) When displaying the transport address, rxrpc_kernel_remote_addr() is used. (3) The port arg is removed from afs_alloc_addrlist() since it's always overridden. (4) afs_merge_fs_addr4() and afs_merge_fs_addr6() do peer lookup and may now return an error that must be handled. (5) afs_find_server() now takes a peer pointer to specify the address. (6) afs_find_server(), afs_compare_fs_alists() and afs_merge_fs_addr[46]{} now do peer pointer comparison rather than address comparison. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-05-01rxrpc: Fix timeout of a call that hasn't yet been granted a channelDavid Howells
afs_make_call() calls rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() to begin a call (which may get stalled in the background waiting for a connection to become available); it then calls rxrpc_kernel_set_max_life() to set the timeouts - but that starts the call timer so the call timer might then expire before we get a connection assigned - leading to the following oops if the call stalled: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 ... CPU: 1 PID: 5111 Comm: krxrpcio/0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-build3+ #701 RIP: 0010:rxrpc_alloc_txbuf+0xc0/0x157 ... Call Trace: <TASK> rxrpc_send_ACK+0x50/0x13b rxrpc_input_call_event+0x16a/0x67d rxrpc_io_thread+0x1b6/0x45f ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x35 ? rxrpc_input_packet+0x519/0x519 kthread+0xe7/0xef ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x1b/0x1b ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fix this by noting the timeouts in struct rxrpc_call when the call is created. The timer will be started when the first packet is transmitted. It shouldn't be possible to trigger this directly from userspace through AF_RXRPC as sendmsg() will return EBUSY if the call is in the waiting-for-conn state if it dropped out of the wait due to a signal. Fixes: 9d35d880e0e4 ("rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-05-01rxrpc: Make it so that a waiting process can be abortedDavid Howells
When sendmsg() creates an rxrpc call, it queues it to wait for a connection and channel to be assigned and then waits before it can start shovelling data as the encrypted DATA packet content includes a summary of the connection parameters. However, sendmsg() may get interrupted before a connection gets assigned and further sendmsg() calls will fail with EBUSY until an assignment is made. Fix this so that the call can at least be aborted without failing on EBUSY. We have to be careful here as sendmsg() mustn't be allowed to start the call timer if the call doesn't yet have a connection assigned as an oops may follow shortly thereafter. Fixes: 540b1c48c37a ("rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg") Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-05-01rxrpc: Fix hard call timeout unitsDavid Howells
The hard call timeout is specified in the RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUT cmsg in seconds, so fix the point at which sendmsg() applies it to the call to convert to jiffies from seconds, not milliseconds. Fixes: a158bdd3247b ("rxrpc: Fix timeout of a call that hasn't yet been granted a channel") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-04-27rxrpc: Fix potential data race in rxrpc_wait_to_be_connected()David Howells
Inside the loop in rxrpc_wait_to_be_connected() it checks call->error to see if it should exit the loop without first checking the call state. This is probably safe as if call->error is set, the call is dead anyway, but we should probably wait for the call state to have been set to completion first, lest it cause surprise on the way out. Fix this by only accessing call->error if the call is complete. We don't actually need to access the error inside the loop as we'll do that after. This caused the following report: BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rxrpc_send_data / rxrpc_set_call_completion write to 0xffff888159cf3c50 of 4 bytes by task 25673 on cpu 1: rxrpc_set_call_completion+0x71/0x1c0 net/rxrpc/call_state.c:22 rxrpc_send_data_packet+0xba9/0x1650 net/rxrpc/output.c:479 rxrpc_transmit_one+0x1e/0x130 net/rxrpc/output.c:714 rxrpc_decant_prepared_tx net/rxrpc/call_event.c:326 [inline] rxrpc_transmit_some_data+0x496/0x600 net/rxrpc/call_event.c:350 rxrpc_input_call_event+0x564/0x1220 net/rxrpc/call_event.c:464 rxrpc_io_thread+0x307/0x1d80 net/rxrpc/io_thread.c:461 kthread+0x1ac/0x1e0 kernel/kthread.c:376 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308 read to 0xffff888159cf3c50 of 4 bytes by task 25672 on cpu 0: rxrpc_send_data+0x29e/0x1950 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:296 rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xb7a/0xc20 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:726 rxrpc_sendmsg+0x413/0x520 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:565 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:724 [inline] sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:747 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0x375/0x4c0 net/socket.c:2501 ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2555 [inline] __sys_sendmmsg+0x263/0x500 net/socket.c:2641 __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2670 [inline] __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2667 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0x57/0x60 net/socket.c:2667 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd value changed: 0x00000000 -> 0xffffffea Fixes: 9d35d880e0e4 ("rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread") Reported-by: syzbot+ebc945fdb4acd72cba78@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/000000000000e7c6d205fa10a3cd@google.com/ Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/508133.1682427395@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
2023-01-06rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O threadDavid Howells
Move the connection setup of client calls to the I/O thread so that a whole load of locking and barrierage can be eliminated. This necessitates the app thread waiting for connection to complete before it can begin encrypting data. This also completes the fix for a race that exists between call connection and call disconnection whereby the data transmission code adds the call to the peer error distribution list after the call has been disconnected (say by the rxrpc socket getting closed). The fix is to complete the process of moving call connection, data transmission and call disconnection into the I/O thread and thus forcibly serialising them. Note that the issue may predate the overhaul to an I/O thread model that were included in the merge window for v6.2, but the timing is very much changed by the change given below. Fixes: cf37b5987508 ("rxrpc: Move DATA transmission into call processor work item") Reported-by: syzbot+c22650d2844392afdcfd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Remove call->state_lockDavid Howells
All the setters of call->state are now in the I/O thread and thus the state lock is now unnecessary. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Move call state changes from sendmsg to I/O threadDavid Howells
Move all the call state changes that are made in rxrpc_sendmsg() to the I/O thread. This is a step towards removing the call state lock. This requires the switch to the RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_REPLY and RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SEND_REPLY states to be done when the last packet is decanted from ->tx_sendmsg to ->tx_buffer in the I/O thread, not when it is added to ->tx_sendmsg by sendmsg(). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Wrap accesses to get call state to put the barrier in one placeDavid Howells
Wrap accesses to get the state of a call from outside of the I/O thread in a single place so that the barrier needed to order wrt the error code and abort code is in just that place. Also use a barrier when setting the call state and again when reading the call state such that the auxiliary completion info (error code, abort code) can be read without taking a read lock on the call state lock. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Set up a connection bundle from a call, not rxrpc_conn_parametersDavid Howells
Use the information now stored in struct rxrpc_call to configure the connection bundle and thence the connection, rather than using the rxrpc_conn_parameters struct. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Tidy up abort generation infrastructureDavid Howells
Tidy up the abort generation infrastructure in the following ways: (1) Create an enum and string mapping table to list the reasons an abort might be generated in tracing. (2) Replace the 3-char string with the values from (1) in the places that use that to log the abort source. This gets rid of a memcpy() in the tracepoint. (3) Subsume the rxrpc_rx_eproto tracepoint with the rxrpc_abort tracepoint and use values from (1) to indicate the trace reason. (4) Always make a call to an abort function at the point of the abort rather than stashing the values into variables and using goto to get to a place where it reported. The C optimiser will collapse the calls together as appropriate. The abort functions return a value that can be returned directly if appropriate. Note that this extends into afs also at the points where that generates an abort. To aid with this, the afs sources need to #define RXRPC_TRACE_ONLY_DEFINE_ENUMS before including the rxrpc tracing header because they don't have access to the rxrpc internal structures that some of the tracepoints make use of. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2023-01-06rxrpc: Only set/transmit aborts in the I/O threadDavid Howells
Only set the abort call completion state in the I/O thread and only transmit ABORT packets from there. rxrpc_abort_call() can then be made to actually send the packet. Further, ABORT packets should only be sent if the call has been exposed to the network (ie. at least one attempted DATA transmission has occurred for it). Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-19rxrpc: Fix missing unlock in rxrpc_do_sendmsg()David Howells
One of the error paths in rxrpc_do_sendmsg() doesn't unlock the call mutex before returning. Fix it to do this. Note that this still doesn't get rid of the checker warning: ../net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:617:5: warning: context imbalance in 'rxrpc_do_sendmsg' - wrong count at exit I think the interplay between the socket lock and the call's user_mutex may be too complicated for checker to analyse, especially as rxrpc_new_client_call_for_sendmsg(), which it calls, returns with the call's user_mutex if successful but unconditionally drops the socket lock. Fixes: e754eba685aa ("rxrpc: Provide a cmsg to specify the amount of Tx data for a call") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-12-01rxrpc: Transmit ACKs at the point of generationDavid Howells
For ACKs generated inside the I/O thread, transmit the ACK at the point of generation. Where the ACK is generated outside of the I/O thread, it's offloaded to the I/O thread to transmit it. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: Remove the _bh annotation from all the spinlocksDavid Howells
None of the spinlocks in rxrpc need a _bh annotation now as the RCU callback routines no longer take spinlocks and the bulk of the packet wrangling code is now run in the I/O thread, not softirq context. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: Make the I/O thread take over the call and local processor workDavid Howells
Move the functions from the call->processor and local->processor work items into the domain of the I/O thread. The call event processor, now called from the I/O thread, then takes over the job of cranking the call state machine, processing incoming packets and transmitting DATA, ACK and ABORT packets. In a future patch, rxrpc_send_ACK() will transmit the ACK on the spot rather than queuing it for later transmission. The call event processor becomes purely received-skb driven. It only transmits things in response to events. We use "pokes" to queue a dummy skb to make it do things like start/resume transmitting data. Timer expiry also results in pokes. The connection event processor, becomes similar, though crypto events, such as dealing with CHALLENGE and RESPONSE packets is offloaded to a work item to avoid doing crypto in the I/O thread. The local event processor is removed and VERSION response packets are generated directly from the packet parser. Similarly, ABORTs generated in response to protocol errors will be transmitted immediately rather than being pushed onto a queue for later transmission. Changes: ======== ver #2) - Fix a couple of introduced lock context imbalances. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: Move DATA transmission into call processor work itemDavid Howells
Move DATA transmission into the call processor work item. In a future patch, this will be called from the I/O thread rather than being itsown work item. This will allow DATA transmission to be driven directly by incoming ACKs, pokes and timers as those are processed. The Tx queue is also split: The queue of packets prepared by sendmsg is now places in call->tx_sendmsg and the packet dispatcher decants the packets into call->tx_buffer as space becomes available in the transmission window. This allows sendmsg to run ahead of the available space to try and prevent an underflow in transmission. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: trace: Don't use __builtin_return_address for rxrpc_call tracingDavid Howells
In rxrpc tracing, use enums to generate lists of points of interest rather than __builtin_return_address() for the rxrpc_call tracepoint Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-12-01rxrpc: trace: Don't use __builtin_return_address for rxrpc_peer tracingDavid Howells
In rxrpc tracing, use enums to generate lists of points of interest rather than __builtin_return_address() for the rxrpc_peer tracepoint Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Fix congestion managementDavid Howells
rxrpc has a problem in its congestion management in that it saves the congestion window size (cwnd) from one call to another, but if this is 0 at the time is saved, then the next call may not actually manage to ever transmit anything. To this end: (1) Don't save cwnd between calls, but rather reset back down to the initial cwnd and re-enter slow-start if data transmission is idle for more than an RTT. (2) Preserve ssthresh instead, as that is a handy estimate of pipe capacity. Knowing roughly when to stop slow start and enter congestion avoidance can reduce the tendency to overshoot and drop larger amounts of packets when probing. In future, cwind growth also needs to be constrained when the window isn't being filled due to being application limited. Reported-by: Simon Wilkinson <sxw@auristor.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Save last ACK's SACK table rather than marking txbufsDavid Howells
Improve the tracking of which packets need to be transmitted by saving the last ACK packet that we receive that has a populated soft-ACK table rather than marking packets. Then we can step through the soft-ACK table and look at the packets we've transmitted beyond that to determine which packets we might want to retransmit. We also look at the highest serial number that has been acked to try and guess which packets we've transmitted the peer is likely to have seen. If necessary, we send a ping to retrieve that number. One downside that might be a problem is that we can't then compare the previous acked/unacked state so easily in rxrpc_input_soft_acks() - which is a potential problem for the slow-start algorithm. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Don't use a ring buffer for call Tx queueDavid Howells
Change the way the Tx queueing works to make the following ends easier to achieve: (1) The filling of packets, the encryption of packets and the transmission of packets can be handled in parallel by separate threads, rather than rxrpc_sendmsg() allocating, filling, encrypting and transmitting each packet before moving onto the next one. (2) Get rid of the fixed-size ring which sets a hard limit on the number of packets that can be retained in the ring. This allows the number of packets to increase without having to allocate a very large ring or having variable-sized rings. [Note: the downside of this is that it's then less efficient to locate a packet for retransmission as we then have to step through a list and examine each buffer in the list.] (3) Allow the filler/encrypter to run ahead of the transmission window. (4) Make it easier to do zero copy UDP from the packet buffers. (5) Make it easier to do zero copy from userspace to the packet buffers - and thence to UDP (only if for unauthenticated connections). To that end, the following changes are made: (1) Use the new rxrpc_txbuf struct instead of sk_buff for keeping packets to be transmitted in. This allows them to be placed on multiple queues simultaneously. An sk_buff isn't really necessary as it's never passed on to lower-level networking code. (2) Keep the transmissable packets in a linked list on the call struct rather than in a ring. As a consequence, the annotation buffer isn't used either; rather a flag is set on the packet to indicate ackedness. (3) Use the RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST flag to indicate that the last packet to be transmitted has been queued. Add RXRPC_CALL_TX_ALL_ACKED to indicate that all packets up to and including the last got hard acked. (4) Wire headers are now stored in the txbuf rather than being concocted on the stack and they're stored immediately before the data, thereby allowing zerocopy of a single span. (5) Don't bother with instant-resend on transmission failure; rather, leave it for a timer or an ACK packet to trigger. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Clean up ACK handlingDavid Howells
Clean up the rxrpc_propose_ACK() function. If deferred PING ACK proposal is split out, it's only really needed for deferred DELAY ACKs. All other ACKs, bar terminal IDLE ACK are sent immediately. The deferred IDLE ACK submission can be handled by conversion of a DELAY ACK into an IDLE ACK if there's nothing to be SACK'd. Also, because there's a delay between an ACK being generated and being transmitted, it's possible that other ACKs of the same type will be generated during that interval. Apart from the ACK time and the serial number responded to, most of the ACK body, including window and SACK parameters, are not filled out till the point of transmission - so we can avoid generating a new ACK if there's one pending that will cover the SACK data we need to convey. Therefore, don't propose a new DELAY or IDLE ACK for a call if there's one already pending. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Allocate ACK records at proposal and queue for transmissionDavid Howells
Allocate rxrpc_txbuf records for ACKs and put onto a queue for the transmitter thread to dispatch. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Remove the flags from the rxrpc_skb tracepointDavid Howells
Remove the flags from the rxrpc_skb tracepoint as we're no longer going to be using this for the transmission buffers and so marking which are transmission buffers isn't going to be necessary. Note that this also remove the rxrpc skb flag that indicates if this is a transmission buffer and so the count is not updated for the moment. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-11-08rxrpc: Add stats procfile and DATA packet statsDavid Howells
Add a procfile, /proc/net/rxrpc/stats, to display some statistics about what rxrpc has been doing. Writing a blank line to the stats file will clear the increment-only counters. Allocated resource counters don't get cleared. Add some counters to count various things about DATA packets, including the number created, transmitted and retransmitted and the number received, the number of ACK-requests markings and the number of jumbo packets received. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
2022-08-25rxrpc: Fix locking in rxrpc's sendmsgDavid Howells
Fix three bugs in the rxrpc's sendmsg implementation: (1) rxrpc_new_client_call() should release the socket lock when returning an error from rxrpc_get_call_slot(). (2) rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window_intr() will return without the call mutex held in the event that we're interrupted by a signal whilst waiting for tx space on the socket or relocking the call mutex afterwards. Fix this by: (a) moving the unlock/lock of the call mutex up to rxrpc_send_data() such that the lock is not held around all of rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window*() and (b) indicating to higher callers whether we're return with the lock dropped. Note that this means recvmsg() will not block on this call whilst we're waiting. (3) After dropping and regaining the call mutex, rxrpc_send_data() needs to go and recheck the state of the tx_pending buffer and the tx_total_len check in case we raced with another sendmsg() on the same call. Thinking on this some more, it might make sense to have different locks for sendmsg() and recvmsg(). There's probably no need to make recvmsg() wait for sendmsg(). It does mean that recvmsg() can return MSG_EOR indicating that a call is dead before a sendmsg() to that call returns - but that can currently happen anyway. Without fix (2), something like the following can be induced: WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! 5.16.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------- syz-executor011/3597 is trying to release lock (&call->user_mutex) at: [<ffffffff885163a3>] rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748 but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: no locks held by syz-executor011/3597. ... Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_unlock_imbalance_bug include/trace/events/lock.h:58 [inline] __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5306 [inline] lock_release.cold+0x49/0x4e kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5657 __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x99/0x5e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:900 rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748 rxrpc_sendmsg+0x420/0x630 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:561 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2409 ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2463 __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2492 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [Thanks to Hawkins Jiawei and Khalid Masum for their attempts to fix this] Fixes: bc5e3a546d55 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals") Reported-by: syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Tested-by: syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com cc: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com> cc: Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@gmail.com> cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166135894583.600315.7170979436768124075.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-05-22rxrpc: Return an error to sendmsg if call failedDavid Howells
If at the end of rxrpc sendmsg() or rxrpc_kernel_send_data() the call that was being given data was aborted remotely or otherwise failed, return an error rather than returning the amount of data buffered for transmission. The call (presumably) did not complete, so there's not much point continuing with it. AF_RXRPC considers it "complete" and so will be unwilling to do anything else with it - and won't send a notification for it, deeming the return from sendmsg sufficient. Not returning an error causes afs to incorrectly handle a StoreData operation that gets interrupted by a change of address due to NAT reconfiguration. This doesn't normally affect most operations since their request parameters tend to fit into a single UDP packet and afs_make_call() returns before the server responds; StoreData is different as it involves transmission of a lot of data. This can be triggered on a client by doing something like: dd if=/dev/zero of=/afs/example.com/foo bs=1M count=512 at one prompt, and then changing the network address at another prompt, e.g.: ifconfig enp6s0 inet 192.168.6.2 && route add 192.168.6.1 dev enp6s0 Tracing packets on an Auristor fileserver looks something like: 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.3 RX 107 ACK Idle Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 192.168.6.3 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(64538) (64538) 192.168.6.3 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(64538) (64538) 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.3 RX 107 ACK Idle Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 <ARP exchange for 192.168.6.2> 192.168.6.2 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(0) (0) 192.168.6.2 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(0) (0) 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2 RX 107 ACK Exceeds Window Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2 RX 74 ABORT Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2 RX 74 ABORT Seq: 29321 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001 The Auristor fileserver logs code -453 (RXGEN_SS_UNMARSHAL), but the abort code received by kafs is -5 (RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR) as the rx layer sees the condition and generates an abort first and the unmarshal error is a consequence of that at the application layer. Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-December/004810.html # v1 Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>