| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Replace `brstack` workload with `sqrtloop` workload, because `sqrtloop`
workload contains fork(), which is suitable for testing the bperf event
inheritance feature.
Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: song@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021110201.325617-3-wutengda@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
|
|
Some shell tests compete for resources and so can't run with other
tests, tag such tests. The "(exclusive)" stems from shared/exclusive
to describe how the tests run as if holding a lock.
For ARM/coresight tests:
Suggested-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Additional failing tests:
Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Cc: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
Cc: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Cc: Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025192109.132482-6-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
|
|
The test has been failing for some time when two separate runs of
perf benchmarks are recorded for cycles events and their counts are
compared, while once the recording was done with option --bpf-counters
and once without it. It is expected that the count of the samples
should be within a certain range, firstly the difference was set to be
within 10%, which was then later raised to 20%. However, the test case
keeps failing on certain architectures as recording the provided
benchmark can produce completely different counts based on the
current load of the system.
Sampling two separate runs on intel-eaglestream-spr-13 of "perf stat
--no-big-num -e cycles -- perf bench sched messaging -g 1 -l 100 -t":
Performance counter stats for 'perf bench sched messaging -g 1 -l 100 -t':
396782898 cycles
0.010051983 seconds time elapsed
0.008664000 seconds user
0.097058000 seconds sys
Performance counter stats for 'perf bench sched messaging -g 1 -l 100 -t':
1431133032 cycles
0.021803714 seconds time elapsed
0.023377000 seconds user
0.349918000 seconds sys
, which is ranging from 400mil to 1400mil samples.
Instead of recording the cycles use instructions event, which provides
more stable values. At the same time change the tested workload to one
of the provided testing workloads by perf that is not based on a
scheduler, which can provide another dependency on the current load.
Sampling instructions event with the new workload provide much more
stable results on intel-eaglestream-spr-13 of "perf stat --no-big-num
-e instructions -- perf test -w brstack":
Performance counter stats for 'perf test -w brstack':
64584494 instructions
0.009173945 seconds time elapsed
0.007262000 seconds user
0.002071000 seconds sys
Performance counter stats for 'perf test -w brstack':
64672669 instructions
0.008888135 seconds time elapsed
0.005018000 seconds user
0.004018000 seconds sys
Signed-off-by: Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: mpetlan@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240625092001.10909-1-vmolnaro@redhat.com
|
|
Refactor test to better enable sharing of logic, to give an idea of
progress and introduce test functions. Add test of measuring both
cycles and cycles:b simultaneously.
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240416170014.985191-2-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
This test case often fails on s390 (about 2 out of 10) because the
10% percent limit on the difference between --bpf-counters event counting
and s390 hardware counting is more than 10% in all failure cases.
Raise the limit to 20% on s390 and the test case succeeds.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: gor@linux.ibm.com
Cc: hca@linux.ibm.com
Cc: sumanthk@linux.ibm.com
Cc: svens@linux.ibm.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240108084009.3959211-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
|
|
As of now, bpf counters (bperf) don't support event groups. But the
default perf stat includes topdown metrics if supported (on recent Intel
machines) which require groups. That makes perf stat exiting.
$ sudo perf stat --bpf-counter true
bpf managed perf events do not yet support groups.
Actually the test explicitly uses cycles event only, but it missed to
pass the option when it checks the availability of the command.
Fixes: 2c0cb9f56020d2ea ("perf test: Add a shell test for 'perf stat --bpf-counters' new option")
Reviewed-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825164152.165610-2-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
Running shellcheck on stat_bpf_counter.sh generates below
warning:
In tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters.sh line 34:
if [ "$base_cycles" == "<not" ]; then
^-- SC3014 (warning): In POSIX sh, == in place of = is undefined.
In tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters.sh line 39:
if [ "$bpf_cycles" == "<not" ]; then
^-- SC3014 (warning): In POSIX sh, == in place of = is undefined.
Fix this by using "=" instead of "==" to work for
all shells.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230709182800.53002-10-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
Currently the test skips with an error because == only works in bash:
$ ./perf test 91 -v
Couldn't bump rlimit(MEMLOCK), failures may take place when creating BPF maps, etc
91: perf stat --bpf-counters test :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 44586
./tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters.sh: 26: [: -v: unexpected operator
test child finished with -2
---- end ----
perf stat --bpf-counters test: Skip
Changing == to = does the same thing, but doesn't result in an error:
./perf test 91 -v
Couldn't bump rlimit(MEMLOCK), failures may take place when creating BPF maps, etc
91: perf stat --bpf-counters test :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 45833
Skipping: --bpf-counters not supported
Error: unknown option `bpf-counters'
[...]
test child finished with -2
---- end ----
perf stat --bpf-counters test: Skip
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211028134828.65774-2-james.clark@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
To pick up fixes, since perf/urgent is already upstream.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
$(( .. )) is a bash feature but the test's interpreter is !/bin/sh,
switch the code to use expr.
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210617184216.2075588-1-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
If the test is run on a hypervisor then the cycles event may not be
counted, skip the test in this situation. Fail the test if cycles are
not counted in the subsequent bpf counter run.
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210617184216.2075588-4-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
Provide additional context for when the stat bpf counters test skips.
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210617184216.2075588-3-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
Add a test to compare the output of perf-stat with and without option
--bpf-counters. If the difference is more than 10%, the test is considered
as failed.
Committer testing:
# perf test bpf-counters
86: perf stat --bpf-counters test : Ok
# perf test -v bpf-counters
86: perf stat --bpf-counters test :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 2433339
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
perf stat --bpf-counters test: Ok
#
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Requested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/EC00E37D-8587-4662-8E30-7AD5F874FA84@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
