| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Set a fake qos_class to a unique value in order to do simple testing of
qos_class for root decoders and mem devs via user cxl_test. A mock
function is added to set the fake qos_class values for memory device
and overrides cxl_endpoint_parse_cdat() in cxl driver code.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240206190431.1810289-5-dave.jiang@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
The RCRB is extracted already during ACPI CEDT table parsing while the
data of this is needed not earlier than dport creation. This
implementation comes with drawbacks: During ACPI table scan there is
already MMIO access including mapping and unmapping, but only ACPI
data should be collected here. The collected data must be transferred
through a couple of interfaces until it is finally consumed when
creating the dport. This causes complex data structures and function
interfaces. Additionally, RCRB parsing will be extended to also
extract AER data, it would be much easier do this at a later point
during port and dport creation when the data structures are available
to hold that data.
To simplify all that, probe the RCRB at a later point during RCH
downstream port creation. Change ACPI table parser to only extract the
base address of either the component registers or the RCRB. Parse and
extract the RCRB in devm_cxl_add_rch_dport().
This is in preparation to centralize all RCRB scanning.
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-2-terry.bowman@amd.com
Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230622205523.85375-3-terry.bowman@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
CXL rev3 spec 8.1.3
RCDs may not have HDM register blocks. Create a fake HDM with information
from the CXL PCIe DVSEC registers. The decoder count will be set to the
HDM count retrieved from the DVSEC cap register.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/167640368994.935665.15831225724059704620.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
In the case where HDM decoder register block exists but is not programmed
and at the same time the DVSEC range register range is active, populate the
CXL decoder object 'cxl_decoder' with info from DVSEC range registers.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/167640368454.935665.13806415120298330717.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
A downstream port must be connected to a component register block.
For restricted hosts the base address is determined from the RCRB. The
RCRB is provided by the host's CEDT CHBS entry. Rework CEDT parser to
get the RCRB and add code to extract the component register block from
it.
RCRB's BAR[0..1] point to the component block containing CXL subsystem
component registers. MEMBAR extraction follows the PCI base spec here,
esp. 64 bit extraction and memory range alignment (6.0, 7.5.1.2.1). The
RCRB base address is cached in the cxl_dport per-host bridge so that the
upstream port component registers can be retrieved later by an RCD
(RCIEP) associated with the host bridge.
Note: Right now the component register block is used for HDM decoder
capability only which is optional for RCDs. If unsupported by the RCD,
the HDM init will fail. It is future work to bypass it in this case.
Co-developed-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y4dsGZ24aJlxSfI1@rric.localdomain
[djbw: introduce devm_cxl_add_rch_dport()]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166993044524.1882361.2539922887413208807.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
Now that dport and decoder enumeration is centralized in the port
driver, the @host argument for these helpers can be made implicit. For
the root port the host is the port's uport device (ACPI0017 for
cxl_acpi), and for all other descendant ports the devm context is the
parent of @port.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164375043390.484143.17617734732003230076.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
Unlike the decoder enumeration for "root decoders" described by platform
firmware, standard decoders can be enumerated from the component
registers space once the base address has been identified (via PCI,
ACPI, or another mechanism).
Add common infrastructure for HDM (Host-managed-Device-Memory) Decoder
enumeration and share it between host-bridge, upstream switch port, and
cxl_test defined decoders.
The locking model for switch level decoders is to hold the port lock
over the enumeration. This facilitates moving the dport and decoder
enumeration to a 'port' driver. For now, the only enumerator of decoder
resources is the cxl_acpi root driver.
Co-developed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164374688404.395335.9239248252443123526.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
The core houses infrastructure for decoder resources. A CXL port's
dports are more closely related to decoder infrastructure than topology
enumeration. Implement generic PCI based dport enumeration in the core,
i.e. arrange for existing root port enumeration from cxl_acpi to share
code with switch port enumeration which just amounts to a small
difference in a pci_walk_bus() invocation once the appropriate 'struct
pci_bus' has been retrieved.
Set the convention that decoder objects are registered after all dports
are enumerated. This enables userspace to know when the CXL core is
finished establishing 'dportX' links underneath the 'portX' object.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164368114191.354031.5270501846455462665.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
Now that cxl_acpi has been converted to use the core ACPI CEDT sub-table
parser, update cxl_test to inject CFMWS and CHBS data directly into
cxl_acpi's handlers.
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163553711363.2509508.17428994087868269952.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
Create an environment for CXL plumbing unit tests. Especially when it
comes to an algorithm for HDM Decoder (Host-managed Device Memory
Decoder) programming, the availability of an in-kernel-tree emulation
environment for CXL configuration complexity and corner cases speeds
development and deters regressions.
The approach taken mirrors what was done for tools/testing/nvdimm/. I.e.
an external module, cxl_test.ko built out of the tools/testing/cxl/
directory, provides mock implementations of kernel APIs and kernel
objects to simulate a real world device hierarchy.
One feedback for the tools/testing/nvdimm/ proposal was "why not do this
in QEMU?". In fact, the CXL development community has developed a QEMU
model for CXL [1]. However, there are a few blocking issues that keep
QEMU from being a tight fit for topology + provisioning unit tests:
1/ The QEMU community has yet to show interest in merging any of this
support that has had patches on the list since November 2020. So,
testing CXL to date involves building custom QEMU with out-of-tree
patches.
2/ CXL mechanisms like cross-host-bridge interleave do not have a clear
path to be emulated by QEMU without major infrastructure work. This
is easier to achieve with the alloc_mock_res() approach taken in this
patch to shortcut-define emulated system physical address ranges with
interleave behavior.
The QEMU enabling has been critical to get the driver off the ground,
and may still move forward, but it does not address the ongoing needs of
a regression testing environment and test driven development.
This patch adds an ACPI CXL Platform definition with emulated CXL
multi-ported host-bridges. A follow on patch adds emulated memory
expander devices.
Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210202005948.241655-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163164680798.2831381.838684634806668012.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
