| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The BPF cpumask selftests are currently run twice in
test_progs/cpumask.c, once by traversing cpumask_success_testcases, and
once by invoking RUN_TESTS(cpumask_success). Remove the invocation of
RUN_TESTS to properly run the selftests only once.
Now that the tests are run only through cpumask_success_testscases, add
to it the missing test_refcount_null_tracking testcase. Also remove the
__success annotation from it, since it is now loaded and invoked by the
runner.
Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis (Meta) <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250309230427.26603-5-emil@etsalapatis.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add selftests for the bpf_cpumask_populate helper that sets a
bpf_cpumask to a bit pattern provided by a BPF program.
Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis (Meta) <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250309230427.26603-3-emil@etsalapatis.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Add three success test cases to test the flattening of array of nested
struct. For these three tests, the number of special fields in map is
BTF_FIELDS_MAX, but the array is defined in structs with different
nested level.
Add one failure test case for the flattening as well. In the test case,
the number of special fields in map is BTF_FIELDS_MAX + 1. It will make
btf_parse_fields() in map_create() return -E2BIG, the creation of map
will succeed, but the load of program will fail because the btf_record
is invalid for the map.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008071114.3718177-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Make sure that BPF programs can declare global kptr arrays and kptr fields
in struct types that is the type of a global variable or the type of a
nested descendant field in a global variable.
An array with only one element is special case, that it treats the element
like a non-array kptr field. Nested arrays are also tested to ensure they
are handled properly.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240523174202.461236-8-thinker.li@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
GCC's -Wall includes -Wsign-compare while clang does not.
Since BPF programs are built with clang we need to add this flag explicitly
to catch problematic comparisons like:
int i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is false.
long i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is true.
C standard for reference:
- If either operand is unsigned long the other shall be converted to unsigned long.
- Otherwise, if one operand is a long int and the other unsigned int, then if a
long int can represent all the values of an unsigned int, the unsigned int
shall be converted to a long int; otherwise both operands shall be converted to
unsigned long int.
- Otherwise, if either operand is long, the other shall be converted to long.
- Otherwise, if either operand is unsigned, the other shall be converted to unsigned.
Unfortunately clang's -Wsign-compare is very noisy.
It complains about (s32)a == (u32)b which is safe and doen't have surprising behavior.
This patch fixes some of the issues. It needs a follow up to fix the rest.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231226191148.48536-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
|
|
The new bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc can be used to count the number of
bits that are set in a struct cpumask* kptr. Let's add a selftest to
verify its behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207210843.168466-3-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
In a prior patch, we removed the bpf_cpumask_any() and
bpf_cpumask_any_and() kfuncs, and replaced them with
bpf_cpumask_any_distribute() and bpf_cpumask_any_distribute_and().
The advertised semantics between the two kfuncs were identical, with the
former always returning the first CPU, and the latter actually returning
any CPU.
This patch updates the selftests for these kfuncs to use the new names.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230610035053.117605-4-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
A prior patch added a new kfunc called bpf_cpumask_first_and() which
wraps cpumask_first_and(). This patch adds a selftest to validate its
behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230610035053.117605-2-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
In a recent patch, we taught the verifier that trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID can
never be NULL. This prevents the verifier from incorrectly failing to
load certain programs where it gets confused and thinks a reference
isn't dropped because it incorrectly assumes that a branch exists in
which a NULL PTR_TO_BTF_ID pointer is never released.
This patch adds a testcase that verifies this cannot happen.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230602150112.1494194-2-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Now that struct bpf_cpumask is RCU safe, there's no need for this kfunc.
Rather than doing the following:
private(MASK) static struct bpf_cpumask __kptr *global;
int BPF_PROG(prog, s32 cpu, ...)
{
struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
bpf_rcu_read_lock();
cpumask = bpf_cpumask_kptr_get(&global);
if (!cpumask) {
bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
return -1;
}
bpf_cpumask_setall(cpumask);
...
bpf_cpumask_release(cpumask);
bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
}
Programs can instead simply do (assume same global cpumask):
int BPF_PROG(prog, ...)
{
struct bpf_cpumask *cpumask;
bpf_rcu_read_lock();
cpumask = global;
if (!cpumask) {
bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
return -1;
}
bpf_cpumask_setall(cpumask);
...
bpf_rcu_read_unlock();
}
In other words, no extra atomic acquire / release, and less boilerplate
code.
This patch removes both the kfunc, as well as its selftests and
documentation.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230316054028.88924-5-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Now that struct bpf_cpumask * is considered an RCU-safe type according
to the verifier, we should add tests that validate its common usages.
This patch adds those tests to the cpumask test suite. A subsequent
changes will remove bpf_cpumask_kptr_get(), and will adjust the selftest
and BPF documentation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230316054028.88924-4-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Once we enable -Wall for BPF sources, compiler will complain about lots
of unused variables, variables that are set but never read, etc.
Fix all these issues first before enabling -Wall in Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309054015.4068562-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
A recent patch added a new set of kfuncs for allocating, freeing,
manipulating, and querying cpumasks. This patch adds a new 'cpumask'
selftest suite which verifies their behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230125143816.721952-5-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
