summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2025-07-28 23:17:46 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2025-07-28 23:17:46 -0700
commitf38b7512903a50eaeb300e9c8d9448187dd3959c (patch)
tree79e246940ae5352845e5ca116f44fcb5d4943d1a /drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
parent0262163136de813894cb172aa8ccf762b92e5fd7 (diff)
parent68b9272ca7ac948b71aba482ef8244dee8032f46 (diff)
Merge tag 'pwm/for-6.17-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux
Pull pwm updates from Uwe Kleine-König: "Apart from the usual mix of new drivers (pwm-argon-fan-hat), adding support for variants to existing drivers, minor improvements to both drivers and docs, device tree documenation updates, the noteworthy changes are: - A hwmon companion driver to pwm-mc33xs2410 living in drivers/hwmon and acked by Guenter Roeck - chardev support for PWM devices. This leverages atomic PWM updates to userspace and at the same time simplifies and accelerates PWM configuration changes" * tag 'pwm/for-6.17-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux: (35 commits) pwm: raspberrypi-poe: Fix spelling mistake "Firwmware" -> "Firmware" hwmon: add support for MC33XS2410 hardware monitoring pwm: mc33xs2410: add hwmon support pwm: img: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls pwm: Expose PWM_WFHWSIZE in public header dt-bindings: pwm: Convert lpc32xx-pwm.txt to yaml format docs: pwm: Adapt Locking paragraph to reality pwm: twl-led: Drop driver local locking pwm: sun4i: Drop driver local locking pwm: sti: Drop driver local locking pwm: microchip-core: Drop driver local locking pwm: lpc18xx-sct: Drop driver local locking pwm: fsl-ftm: Drop driver local locking pwm: clps711x: Drop driver local locking pwm: atmel: Drop driver local locking pwm: argon-fan-hat: Add Argon40 Fan HAT support dt-bindings: pwm: argon40,fan-hat: Document Argon40 Fan HAT dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Document Argon40 pwm: pwm-mediatek: Add support for PWM IP V3.0.2 in MT6991/MT8196 pwm: pwm-mediatek: Pass PWM_CK_26M_SEL from platform data ...
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c52
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
index d5b647e6be78..4a07315b0744 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
@@ -4,11 +4,28 @@
* For SiFive's PWM IP block documentation please refer Chapter 14 of
* Reference Manual : https://static.dev.sifive.com/FU540-C000-v1.0.pdf
*
+ * PWM output inversion: According to the SiFive Reference manual
+ * the output of each comparator is high whenever the value of pwms is
+ * greater than or equal to the corresponding pwmcmpX[Reference Manual].
+ *
+ * Figure 29 in the same manual shows that the pwmcmpXcenter bit is
+ * hard-tied to 0 (XNOR), which effectively inverts the comparison so that
+ * the output goes HIGH when `pwms < pwmcmpX`.
+ *
+ * In other words, each pwmcmp register actually defines the **inactive**
+ * (low) period of the pulse, not the active time exactly opposite to what
+ * the documentation text implies.
+ *
+ * To compensate, this driver always **inverts** the duty value when reading
+ * or writing pwmcmp registers , so that users interact with a conventional
+ * **active-high** PWM interface.
+ *
+ *
* Limitations:
* - When changing both duty cycle and period, we cannot prevent in
* software that the output might produce a period with mixed
* settings (new period length and old duty cycle).
- * - The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle.
+ * - The hardware cannot generate a 0% duty cycle.
* - The hardware generates only inverted output.
*/
#include <linux/clk.h>
@@ -101,7 +118,7 @@ static void pwm_sifive_update_clock(struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata,
/* As scale <= 15 the shift operation cannot overflow. */
num = (unsigned long long)NSEC_PER_SEC << (PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH + scale);
- ddata->real_period = div64_ul(num, rate);
+ ddata->real_period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(num, rate);
dev_dbg(ddata->parent,
"New real_period = %u ns\n", ddata->real_period);
}
@@ -110,9 +127,14 @@ static int pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct pwm_state *state)
{
struct pwm_sifive_ddata *ddata = pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip);
- u32 duty, val;
+ u32 duty, val, inactive;
- duty = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
+ inactive = readl(ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
+ /*
+ * PWM hardware uses 'inactive' counts in pwmcmp, so invert to get actual duty.
+ * Here, 'inactive' is the low time and we compute duty as max_count - inactive.
+ */
+ duty = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - inactive;
state->enabled = duty > 0;
@@ -121,9 +143,9 @@ static int pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
state->enabled = false;
state->period = ddata->real_period;
- state->duty_cycle =
- (u64)duty * ddata->real_period >> PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH;
- state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
+ state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)duty * ddata->real_period,
+ (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH));
+ state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
return 0;
}
@@ -137,9 +159,10 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
unsigned long long num;
bool enabled;
int ret = 0;
- u32 frac;
+ u64 frac;
+ u32 inactive;
- if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
+ if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
return -EINVAL;
cur_state = pwm->state;
@@ -156,9 +179,12 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* consecutively
*/
num = (u64)duty_cycle * (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH);
- frac = DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(num, state->period);
- /* The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle */
- frac = min(frac, (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1);
+ frac = num;
+ do_div(frac, state->period);
+ /* The hardware cannot generate a 0% duty cycle */
+ frac = min(frac, (u64)(1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1);
+ /* pwmcmp register must be loaded with the inactive(invert the duty) */
+ inactive = (1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) - 1 - frac;
mutex_lock(&ddata->lock);
if (state->period != ddata->approx_period) {
@@ -190,7 +216,7 @@ static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
}
}
- writel(frac, ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
+ writel(inactive, ddata->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP(pwm->hwpwm));
if (!state->enabled)
clk_disable(ddata->clk);