summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2022-07-03 09:42:17 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2022-07-03 09:42:17 -0700
commit20855e4cb361adeabce3665f5174b09b4a6ebfe6 (patch)
treedc344c6f60847394614ba90870c9b125620f5e4b /fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
parent69cb6c6556ad89620547318439d6be8bb1629a5a (diff)
parent7561cea5dbb97fecb952548a0fb74fb105bf4664 (diff)
Merge tag 'xfs-5.19-fixes-4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux
Pull xfs fixes from Darrick Wong: "This fixes some stalling problems and corrects the last of the problems (I hope) observed during testing of the new atomic xattr update feature. - Fix statfs blocking on background inode gc workers - Fix some broken inode lock assertion code - Fix xattr leaf buffer leaks when cancelling a deferred xattr update operation - Clean up xattr recovery to make it easier to understand. - Fix xattr leaf block verifiers tripping over empty blocks. - Remove complicated and error prone xattr leaf block bholding mess. - Fix a bug where an rt extent crossing EOF was treated as "posteof" blocks and cleaned unnecessarily. - Fix a UAF when log shutdown races with unmount" * tag 'xfs-5.19-fixes-4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux: xfs: prevent a UAF when log IO errors race with unmount xfs: dont treat rt extents beyond EOF as eofblocks to be cleared xfs: don't hold xattr leaf buffers across transaction rolls xfs: empty xattr leaf header blocks are not corruption xfs: clean up the end of xfs_attri_item_recover xfs: always free xattri_leaf_bp when cancelling a deferred op xfs: use invalidate_lock to check the state of mmap_lock xfs: factor out the common lock flags assert xfs: introduce xfs_inodegc_push() xfs: bound maximum wait time for inodegc work
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c64
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index 52d6f2c7d58b..3e1c62ffa4f7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -132,6 +132,26 @@ xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared(
}
/*
+ * You can't set both SHARED and EXCL for the same lock,
+ * and only XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL, XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED,
+ * XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL are valid values
+ * to set in lock_flags.
+ */
+static inline void
+xfs_lock_flags_assert(
+ uint lock_flags)
+{
+ ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) !=
+ (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
+ ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) !=
+ (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
+ ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) !=
+ (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
+ ASSERT((lock_flags & ~(XFS_LOCK_MASK | XFS_LOCK_SUBCLASS_MASK)) == 0);
+ ASSERT(lock_flags != 0);
+}
+
+/*
* In addition to i_rwsem in the VFS inode, the xfs inode contains 2
* multi-reader locks: invalidate_lock and the i_lock. This routine allows
* various combinations of the locks to be obtained.
@@ -168,18 +188,7 @@ xfs_ilock(
{
trace_xfs_ilock(ip, lock_flags, _RET_IP_);
- /*
- * You can't set both SHARED and EXCL for the same lock,
- * and only XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED,
- * and XFS_ILOCK_EXCL are valid values to set in lock_flags.
- */
- ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) !=
- (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
- ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) !=
- (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
- ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) !=
- (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
- ASSERT((lock_flags & ~(XFS_LOCK_MASK | XFS_LOCK_SUBCLASS_MASK)) == 0);
+ xfs_lock_flags_assert(lock_flags);
if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL) {
down_write_nested(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem,
@@ -222,18 +231,7 @@ xfs_ilock_nowait(
{
trace_xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, lock_flags, _RET_IP_);
- /*
- * You can't set both SHARED and EXCL for the same lock,
- * and only XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED,
- * and XFS_ILOCK_EXCL are valid values to set in lock_flags.
- */
- ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) !=
- (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
- ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) !=
- (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
- ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) !=
- (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
- ASSERT((lock_flags & ~(XFS_LOCK_MASK | XFS_LOCK_SUBCLASS_MASK)) == 0);
+ xfs_lock_flags_assert(lock_flags);
if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL) {
if (!down_write_trylock(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem))
@@ -291,19 +289,7 @@ xfs_iunlock(
xfs_inode_t *ip,
uint lock_flags)
{
- /*
- * You can't set both SHARED and EXCL for the same lock,
- * and only XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED,
- * and XFS_ILOCK_EXCL are valid values to set in lock_flags.
- */
- ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) !=
- (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
- ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) !=
- (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL));
- ASSERT((lock_flags & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)) !=
- (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED | XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
- ASSERT((lock_flags & ~(XFS_LOCK_MASK | XFS_LOCK_SUBCLASS_MASK)) == 0);
- ASSERT(lock_flags != 0);
+ xfs_lock_flags_assert(lock_flags);
if (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
up_write(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem);
@@ -379,8 +365,8 @@ xfs_isilocked(
}
if (lock_flags & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL|XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED)) {
- return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem,
- (lock_flags & XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED));
+ return __xfs_rwsem_islocked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping->invalidate_lock,
+ (lock_flags & XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED));
}
if (lock_flags & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED)) {