Merge branch 'wireguard-siphash-patches-for-5-16-rc6'

Jason A. Donenfeld says:

====================
wireguard/siphash patches for 5.16-rc

Here's quite a largeish set of stable patches I've had queued up and
testing for a number of months now:

  - Patch (1) squelches a sparse warning by fixing an annotation.
  - Patches (2), (3), and (5) are minor improvements and fixes to the
    test suite.
  - Patch (4) is part of a tree-wide cleanup to have module-specific
    init and exit functions.
  - Patch (6) fixes a an issue with dangling dst references, by having a
    function to release references immediately rather than deferring,
    and adds an associated test case to prevent this from regressing.
  - Patches (7) and (8) help mitigate somewhat a potential DoS on the
    ingress path due to the use of skb_list's locking hitting contention
    on multiple cores by switching to using a ring buffer and dropping
    packets on contention rather than locking up another core spinning.
  - Patch (9) switches kvzalloc to kvcalloc for better form.
  - Patch (10) fixes alignment traps in siphash with clang-13 (and maybe
    other compilers) on armv6, by switching to using the unaligned
    functions by default instead of the aligned functions by default.
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129153929.3457-1-Jason@zx2c4.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/siphash.h b/include/linux/siphash.h
index bf21591a9e5e..0cda61855d90 100644
--- a/include/linux/siphash.h
+++ b/include/linux/siphash.h
@@ -27,9 +27,7 @@ static inline bool siphash_key_is_zero(const siphash_key_t *key)
 }
 
 u64 __siphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key);
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
 u64 __siphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key);
-#endif
 
 u64 siphash_1u64(const u64 a, const siphash_key_t *key);
 u64 siphash_2u64(const u64 a, const u64 b, const siphash_key_t *key);
@@ -82,10 +80,9 @@ static inline u64 ___siphash_aligned(const __le64 *data, size_t len,
 static inline u64 siphash(const void *data, size_t len,
 			  const siphash_key_t *key)
 {
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
-	if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)data, SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) ||
+	    !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)data, SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT))
 		return __siphash_unaligned(data, len, key);
-#endif
 	return ___siphash_aligned(data, len, key);
 }
 
@@ -96,10 +93,8 @@ typedef struct {
 
 u32 __hsiphash_aligned(const void *data, size_t len,
 		       const hsiphash_key_t *key);
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
 u32 __hsiphash_unaligned(const void *data, size_t len,
 			 const hsiphash_key_t *key);
-#endif
 
 u32 hsiphash_1u32(const u32 a, const hsiphash_key_t *key);
 u32 hsiphash_2u32(const u32 a, const u32 b, const hsiphash_key_t *key);
@@ -135,10 +130,9 @@ static inline u32 ___hsiphash_aligned(const __le32 *data, size_t len,
 static inline u32 hsiphash(const void *data, size_t len,
 			   const hsiphash_key_t *key)
 {
-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
-	if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)data, HSIPHASH_ALIGNMENT))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) ||
+	    !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)data, HSIPHASH_ALIGNMENT))
 		return __hsiphash_unaligned(data, len, key);
-#endif
 	return ___hsiphash_aligned(data, len, key);
 }