Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-5.5-rc1-kunit' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest

Pull kselftest KUnit support gtom Shuah Khan:
 "This adds KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for
  the Linux kernel from Brendan Higgins.

  KUnit is not an end-to-end testing framework. It is currently
  supported on UML and sub-systems can write unit tests and run them in
  UML env. KUnit documentation is included in this update.

  In addition, this Kunit update adds 3 new kunit tests:

   - proc sysctl test from Iurii Zaikin

   - the 'list' doubly linked list test from David Gow

   - ext4 tests for decoding extended timestamps from Iurii Zaikin

  In the future KUnit will be linked to Kselftest framework to provide a
  way to trigger KUnit tests from user-space"

* tag 'linux-kselftest-5.5-rc1-kunit' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest: (23 commits)
  lib/list-test: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list
  ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps
  Documentation: kunit: Fix verification command
  kunit: Fix '--build_dir' option
  kunit: fix failure to build without printk
  MAINTAINERS: add proc sysctl KUnit test to PROC SYSCTL section
  kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec()
  MAINTAINERS: add entry for KUnit the unit testing framework
  Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit
  kunit: defconfig: add defconfigs for building KUnit tests
  kunit: tool: add Python wrappers for running KUnit tests
  kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources
  kunit: test: add the concept of assertions
  kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort
  kunit: test: add support for test abort
  objtool: add kunit_try_catch_throw to the noreturn list
  kunit: test: add initial tests
  lib: enable building KUnit in lib/
  kunit: test: add the concept of expectations
  kunit: test: add assertion printing library
  ...

1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/kunit/try-catch.c b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..55686839eb61
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/kunit/try-catch.c
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a
+ * controlled manner.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC.
+ * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <kunit/try-catch.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
+
+void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch)
+{
+	try_catch->try_result = -EFAULT;
+	complete_and_exit(try_catch->try_completion, -EFAULT);
+}
+
+static int kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter(void *data)
+{
+	struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = data;
+
+	try_catch->try(try_catch->context);
+
+	complete_and_exit(try_catch->try_completion, 0);
+}
+
+static unsigned long kunit_test_timeout(void)
+{
+	unsigned long timeout_msecs;
+
+	/*
+	 * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): We should probably have some type of
+	 * variable timeout here. The only question is what that timeout value
+	 * should be.
+	 *
+	 * The intention has always been, at some point, to be able to label
+	 * tests with some type of size bucket (unit/small, integration/medium,
+	 * large/system/end-to-end, etc), where each size bucket would get a
+	 * default timeout value kind of like what Bazel does:
+	 * https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/be/common-definitions.html#test.size
+	 * There is still some debate to be had on exactly how we do this. (For
+	 * one, we probably want to have some sort of test runner level
+	 * timeout.)
+	 *
+	 * For more background on this topic, see:
+	 * https://mike-bland.com/2011/11/01/small-medium-large.html
+	 */
+	if (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs) {
+		/*
+		 * If sysctl_hung_task is active, just set the timeout to some
+		 * value less than that.
+		 *
+		 * In regards to the above TODO, if we decide on variable
+		 * timeouts, this logic will likely need to change.
+		 */
+		timeout_msecs = (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs - 1) *
+				MSEC_PER_SEC;
+	} else {
+		timeout_msecs = 300 * MSEC_PER_SEC; /* 5 min */
+	}
+
+	return timeout_msecs;
+}
+
+void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context)
+{
+	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(try_completion);
+	struct kunit *test = try_catch->test;
+	struct task_struct *task_struct;
+	int exit_code, time_remaining;
+
+	try_catch->context = context;
+	try_catch->try_completion = &try_completion;
+	try_catch->try_result = 0;
+	task_struct = kthread_run(kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter,
+				  try_catch,
+				  "kunit_try_catch_thread");
+	if (IS_ERR(task_struct)) {
+		try_catch->catch(try_catch->context);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	time_remaining = wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion,
+						     kunit_test_timeout());
+	if (time_remaining == 0) {
+		kunit_err(test, "try timed out\n");
+		try_catch->try_result = -ETIMEDOUT;
+	}
+
+	exit_code = try_catch->try_result;
+
+	if (!exit_code)
+		return;
+
+	if (exit_code == -EFAULT)
+		try_catch->try_result = 0;
+	else if (exit_code == -EINTR)
+		kunit_err(test, "wake_up_process() was never called\n");
+	else if (exit_code)
+		kunit_err(test, "Unknown error: %d\n", exit_code);
+
+	try_catch->catch(try_catch->context);
+}
+
+void kunit_try_catch_init(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch,
+			  struct kunit *test,
+			  kunit_try_catch_func_t try,
+			  kunit_try_catch_func_t catch)
+{
+	try_catch->test = test;
+	try_catch->try = try;
+	try_catch->catch = catch;
+}