summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/mincore.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBaolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>2025-05-09 08:45:21 +0800
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2025-05-22 14:55:36 -0700
commit4df65651f7075481e44c03bb39855a38783d87ac (patch)
tree25d0de1009321e9009aa60f3cfd37e9dd5f1dceb /mm/mincore.c
parent83b6d498d027002e79c2ce40b5729137500c3170 (diff)
mm: mincore: use pte_batch_hint() to batch process large folios
When I tested the mincore() syscall, I observed that it takes longer with 64K mTHP enabled on my Arm64 server. The reason is the mincore_pte_range() still checks each PTE individually, even when the PTEs are contiguous, which is not efficient. Thus we can use pte_batch_hint() to get the batch number of the present contiguous PTEs, which can improve the performance. I tested the mincore() syscall with 1G anonymous memory populated with 64K mTHP, and observed an obvious performance improvement: w/o patch w/ patch changes 6022us 549us +91% Moreover, I also tested mincore() with disabling mTHP/THP, and did not see any obvious regression for base pages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/99cb00ee626ceb6e788102ca36821815cd832237.1746697240.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mincore.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/mincore.c22
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
index 832f29f46767..42d6c9c8da86 100644
--- a/mm/mincore.c
+++ b/mm/mincore.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include "swap.h"
+#include "internal.h"
static int mincore_hugetlb(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
@@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ static int mincore_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
pte_t *ptep;
unsigned char *vec = walk->private;
int nr = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ int step, i;
ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
if (ptl) {
@@ -118,16 +120,26 @@ static int mincore_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
walk->action = ACTION_AGAIN;
return 0;
}
- for (; addr != end; ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+ for (; addr != end; ptep += step, addr += step * PAGE_SIZE) {
pte_t pte = ptep_get(ptep);
+ step = 1;
/* We need to do cache lookup too for pte markers */
if (pte_none_mostly(pte))
__mincore_unmapped_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE,
vma, vec);
- else if (pte_present(pte))
- *vec = 1;
- else { /* pte is a swap entry */
+ else if (pte_present(pte)) {
+ unsigned int batch = pte_batch_hint(ptep, pte);
+
+ if (batch > 1) {
+ unsigned int max_nr = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ step = min_t(unsigned int, batch, max_nr);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < step; i++)
+ vec[i] = 1;
+ } else { /* pte is a swap entry */
swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
if (non_swap_entry(entry)) {
@@ -146,7 +158,7 @@ static int mincore_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
#endif
}
}
- vec++;
+ vec += step;
}
pte_unmap_unlock(ptep - 1, ptl);
out: