diff options
| author | pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com> | 2025-09-16 12:47:31 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2025-09-19 11:48:14 +0200 |
| commit | 872e397d62a67843ea09cf6641819cb1a7e5ee98 (patch) | |
| tree | e5d3e4ff75f68f9b7411d02f74b50132e86d7870 /rust/helpers/pci.c | |
| parent | a37a6f54439bf82b827a7072415d3a4afa4e12bd (diff) | |
wifi: mac80211: Remove redundant rcu_read_lock/unlock() in spin_lock
Since commit a8bb74acd8efe ("rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched update-side function definitions")
there is no difference between rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh() and
rcu_read_lock_sched() in terms of RCU read section and the relevant grace
period. That means that spin_lock(), which implies rcu_read_lock_sched(),
also implies rcu_read_lock().
There is no need no explicitly start a RCU read section if one has already
been started implicitly by spin_lock().
Simplify the code and remove the inner rcu_read_lock() invocation.
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <dolinux.peng@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250916044735.2316171-11-dolinux.peng@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/helpers/pci.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions