diff options
author | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> | 2025-09-03 14:59:46 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> | 2025-09-29 09:20:34 +0200 |
commit | ec66e0d599520ab414db745544e25d80d0ac5054 (patch) | |
tree | 0a575b2c36d2c482717b03ce7b85eb7d7bc3c271 /rust/helpers/security.c | |
parent | 2d517aa09bbc4203f10cdee7e1d42f3bbdc1b1cd (diff) |
slab: add sheaf support for batching kfree_rcu() operations
Extend the sheaf infrastructure for more efficient kfree_rcu() handling.
For caches with sheaves, on each cpu maintain a rcu_free sheaf in
addition to main and spare sheaves.
kfree_rcu() operations will try to put objects on this sheaf. Once full,
the sheaf is detached and submitted to call_rcu() with a handler that
will try to put it in the barn, or flush to slab pages using bulk free,
when the barn is full. Then a new empty sheaf must be obtained to put
more objects there.
It's possible that no free sheaves are available to use for a new
rcu_free sheaf, and the allocation in kfree_rcu() context can only use
GFP_NOWAIT and thus may fail. In that case, fall back to the existing
kfree_rcu() implementation.
Expected advantages:
- batching the kfree_rcu() operations, that could eventually replace the
existing batching
- sheaves can be reused for allocations via barn instead of being
flushed to slabs, which is more efficient
- this includes cases where only some cpus are allowed to process rcu
callbacks (CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU)
Possible disadvantage:
- objects might be waiting for more than their grace period (it is
determined by the last object freed into the sheaf), increasing memory
usage - but the existing batching does that too.
Only implement this for CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED as the tiny
implementation favors smaller memory footprint over performance.
Also for now skip the usage of rcu sheaf for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT as the
contexts where kfree_rcu() is called might not be compatible with taking
a barn spinlock or a GFP_NOWAIT allocation of a new sheaf taking a
spinlock - the current kfree_rcu() implementation avoids doing that.
Teach kvfree_rcu_barrier() to flush all rcu_free sheaves from all caches
that have them. This is not a cheap operation, but the barrier usage is
rare - currently kmem_cache_destroy() or on module unload.
Add CONFIG_SLUB_STATS counters free_rcu_sheaf and free_rcu_sheaf_fail to
count how many kfree_rcu() used the rcu_free sheaf successfully and how
many had to fall back to the existing implementation.
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/helpers/security.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions