staging: vchiq_arm: tidy up service function naming

During a recent review Dan Carpenter reported that the function naming of
(un)lock_service is misleading. They are like wrapper around kref_get /
kref_put and don't have anything to do with locking. So use a name which
represent more the actual behavior. Btw add the vchiq prefix to avoid
possible name conflicts.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1622735405-9980-12-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions